Draft Housing (Tenancy Deposit Schemes) Order 2026

Sarah Edwards Excerpts

Monday 2nd November 2026 General Committees

[Sarah Edwards (Tamworth) (Lab)]

It is an honour to serve under your chairship, Sir Desmond. This is one of those occasions when a piece of legislation seems rather niche, but is completely obvious once we examine its purpose. The private rental sector has been broken for decades. In Tamworth and around the whole country we have seen skyrocketing rents for poor-quality and substandard housing. Tenants have been living in houses or flats that feel neglected by their landlords, in areas that often say that they feel neglected by Westminster. Community spaces have vanished and been left neglected. Where people cannot own their own home, areas are left without strong advocacy for change.

The Government’s Renters’ Rights Act has overhauled the entire sector, restoring fairness between tenants and landlords by giving over 5,000 tenants in Tamworth alone, and over 11 million renters across the country, greater security, rights and protections. The new rules mean that renters no longer have to fear last-minute no-fault evictions. Future rules brought forward by the Act mean that rented homes will have to meet higher standards, especially when it comes to tackling damp and mould. Renters have certainty that they can stay for longer in safe, good-quality homes and are no longer locked into contracts and unable to move for years.

People with greater housing security can be further empowered to start building lives in the communities they live in. With that comes the need for serious investment in their local areas. The draft order means that the interest accruing on the estimated £5.5 billion already in the tenancy deposit schemes will not just go into the pockets of those administering that scheme, which is meant to be non-profit, but could instead be invested into local projects that align with what renters want to see in their areas. After all, that interest is generated from the tenants’ own money. It is only right that the renters and their communities can see the benefit. We estimate that the interest earned on a pot would be around £550 million. That is a lot of money that could help to restore libraries, reopen community centres, improve local facilities and create places where people want to live, not places where they have to live. Renters deserve more than just a secure roof over their heads. They deserve thriving communities, decent local facilities and a stake in the place they call home.

We can already see the trajectory that the Government are plotting with the Renters’ Rights Act, and we can already see the difference they are making to communities such as Glascote Heath and Stonydelph through their £20 million Pride in Place programme. I urge the Minister to consider this opportunity to boost funds that communities can spend.

[Mr Andrew Snowden (Fylde) (Con)]

The hon. Member highlighted the statistic that around £550 million will be potentially raised in interest. How much of that interest does she think would be appropriate to go into the investments that she has outlined, given that we do not have any numbers for what we are supposed to be approving? As the shadow Minister, my hon. Friend the Member for Orpington, said, this is in effect a blank cheque.

[Sarah Edwards]

The purpose here is to outline the possibility for its use. That is not to negate the fact that tenants can also still claim against the scheme if they need to, but there is money here that is not currently doing anything for our communities. We need to look at what is needed to administer the scheme and support the ebb and flow of what it does; what I am asking from the Minister is to define how we can use the rest of the money more creatively. I would like him to be creative with it, and would urge that those living in these communities who have bold ideas should be involved in that problem solving. It is quite a lot of money, and although it may be undefined, it has been underutilised to date, and it could offer a lot for communities. I therefore support the order. I hope that the money will be reinvested into communities’ big ideas and boost hope, play, knowledge, safety and joy.

Chetwynd Bridge

Sarah Edwards Excerpts

Wednesday 14th October 2026 Westminster Hall

[Dave Robertson]

I appreciate the intervention from my hon. Friend and neighbour. The issue is really important. It is economic, social and cultural. When I say that the detour goes through the middle of Burton, it really does go through the middle of Burton. It is not just going close to the town; it goes through the middle of one of the biggest towns in, I think, Britain’s fourth biggest county. That 18-mile diversion is really significant. It is not just a bit of an inconvenience. It is significant for anybody just trying to get around Burton, because there is a huge amount more traffic on those local roads.

[Sarah Edwards (Tamworth) (Lab)]

I thank my hon. Friend for his brilliant speech about a campaign that we have been trying to run for a long time, and I am grateful that the Minister is present to hear us. Farmers in my patch have complained about the cost that the diversion is adding to their businesses, because sometimes they need to use an extra 20 litres of red diesel. Given the cost of living crisis and the challenges facing businesses, that is not acceptable, and it is also an environmental problem. Does my hon. Friend agree that it is essential that we get this bridge? We have been promised it for 20 years now, and it is about due.

[Dave Robertson]

My hon. Friend and neighbour is a real advocate for Chetwynd bridge, as are all colleagues who have contributed to the debate. It is a really important piece of infrastructure for a huge part of the country, affecting at least four constituencies and likely others much further afield. I completely agree with her, and we are all eager to see the outcome of the structures fund.

On the impact of different vehicles using the bridge, I will start with the emergency services. Ambulances are currently able to traverse the bridge, being below the weight limit, but they get caught up in the queues that form because it is signalised and one way, where it should be two lanes. A modern fire engine, however, weighs upwards of 12 tonnes; fill it with water and it weighs even more. Those vehicles are not allowed to cross Chetwynd bridge, which results in an 18-mile detour to go north via Burton, or south all the way down to Elford, in the constituency of my hon. Friend the Member for South Derbyshire.

This year we saw the devastating impact that wildfires can have, including the terrible situation in Stourbridge over the summer. Every single pump that Staffordshire fire service could activate was out fighting wildfires. The service dealt with well in excess of 1,000 outdoor fires just this summer. Getting those pumps to where they need to be is vital. The 18-mile detour means minutes lost, time wasted, property damaged and potentially lost and, really worryingly, lives at greater risk.

Fire engines not being able to get around that part of England is probably the most extreme example of the disruption, but for businesses in our region—to come back to the intervention by the hon. Member for Strangford (Jim Shannon)—its impact is daily and serious. In the last couple of decades, Lichfield has experienced significant growth, because we are part of the golden triangle of freight and logistics in the midlands. I think Lichfield and the A38 corridor are within a three-hour drive of 90% of the population of the UK.

In the Lichfield constituency, more than one in 10 jobs depend directly on road haulage. Next door in Tamworth, the figure is 7.3%. Significant numbers of jobs rely on road haulage being able to get things around the country quickly. Those retail and wholesale sectors, which are heavily dependent on road haulage, are our largest employers. This is not just a “nice to have”; it is essential to the local economies that are the beating heart of the entire national economy.

Chetwynd bridge is just a few miles from Fradley Park, an important logistics hub spread over 173 acres. As a result of the partial closure, HGVs incur additional time and cost to their journeys, not to mention increased polluting impact—18 miles for an HGV is a lot of carbon footprint. I am pleased that the terms of the structures fund placed special emphasis on road haulage, recognising the significance of the sector. The impact on businesses at Fradley Park is serious and ongoing. I thank the Minister, in his previous portfolio, for his engagement on the construction of the structures fund, specifically looking into whether replacements would be considered. I think my hon. Friend the Member for Tamworth and I last wrote to him about that in May.

Beyond that, I have already stressed the knock-on impact on haulage, which is felt acutely at Catton estate, which is just up from the bridge on the Tamworth side in the constituency of my hon. Friend the Member for South Derbyshire. Catton estate hosts numerous festivals, including Bearded Theory, which has a capacity of 15,000, and Bloodstock, the UK’s largest metal festival, which has a capacity of 20,000—I assume you have been at least once, Ms McVey.

--- Later in debate ---

[Dave Robertson]

I could not agree more. The Government want to talk about growth in every postcode: well, here is some growth for our postcode. Lifting the restrictions will make it easier for people to move around our parts of Staffordshire and Derbyshire, which will directly impact the ability of businesses to invest internally, to grow and to continue to drive our local economies. It is really important.

Before I come to my conclusion—I have a couple of minutes—I place on record my thanks to my hon. Friends the Members for South Derbyshire, for Burton and Uttoxeter and for Tamworth for all their work and support on this matter. The bridge does not affect just one constituency; it affects at least four, and its effects go much further afield, into Staffordshire, Derbyshire and Leicestershire.

[Sarah Edwards]

I know time is short, so I thank my hon. Friend for indulging me one more time. The bridge is essential to all our constituencies, so closing it is not an option. We have already spent £14 million to try to fix it, and it did not work. It is a heritage bridge. Does he agree that we need a new bridge and that we must have support from the Minister to ensure that it will help all our constituents?

[Dave Robertson]

I 100% agree. The bridge is essential. It is a big piece of infrastructure.

I understand that the Minister will not be able to give me a yes or no from the Dispatch Box today—I am aware of how this works—but my hon. Friends and I are eager to hear a timeline for the progress of the structures fund. The Chetwynd bridge scheme is effectively shovel ready. Staffordshire county council is prepared to commit just over £6 million to the project and is asking for just over £40 million from the structures fund to support that. It wants this bridge open in 2029. This is a shovel-ready project that can be driven really quickly. Using the structures fund to invest in communities like ours is a great opportunity for the Government to show growth in every postcode—to show that politics can work, that big Government can work for people and that we can get investment into the places it needs to go. Can the Minister set out a timeline for the structures fund, and will he or the relevant Minister meet with me and my hon. Friends to discuss that timeline further?

Disadvantaged Communities

Sarah Edwards Excerpts

Wednesday 4th June 2025 Westminster Hall

[Sarah Edwards (Tamworth) (Lab)]

It is an honour to serve under your chairship, Sir Roger. I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Wolverhampton North East (Mrs Brackenridge) for securing this debate. I started my career working for Oxfam, whose mission was to make poverty history.

Across the country, including in my constituency, we have seen what over a decade of neglect looks like: community centres gone, local shops shut down, public services underfunded and overstretched. In Tamworth, youth centres were left to crumble—they were not repaired; they were closed—so young people lost a safe space. That is what happens when investment dries up.

Since 2012, more than 760 youth clubs have shut nationwide. That is not just a number; it is a message that says, “You don’t matter.” That is how it feels in places such as Glascote Heath, Belgrave and Stonydelph. The Government promised levelling up but the most deprived areas have seen little support, and some none at all. How can we talk about levelling up while cutting back support for the people who need it most?

We are the sixth-richest country in the world but, I ask, rich for whom? In my constituency, as a union organiser for over 11 years, I saw people working long hours and relying on in-work benefits. Disabled people are now worried that their support may be stripped away while they face rising bills and shrinking safety nets. I ask the Government to rethink their approach in this area.

This issue is about more than just poverty; it is about inequity and exclusion, and how they breed division. Last summer, we saw unrest in Tamworth, communities divided, and tensions that had been building for years. Work must now get under way to rebuild, with the local authorities and the support that goes with them. Let us be honest: inequality cannot be patched over with slogans; it is fixed by investing properly in schools, housing, the NHS and jobs that people can build a life around.