Saqib Bhatti Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Saqib Bhatti

Information between 4th February 2026 - 6th March 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
3 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context
Saqib Bhatti voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 458 Noes - 104
4 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context
Saqib Bhatti voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 98 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 392 Noes - 116
23 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context
Saqib Bhatti voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 361 Noes - 84
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context
Saqib Bhatti voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 76 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 156 Noes - 273
23 Feb 2026 - Industry and Exports (Financial Assistance) Bill - View Vote Context
Saqib Bhatti voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 76 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 272
2 Mar 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context
Saqib Bhatti voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 410


Speeches
Saqib Bhatti speeches from: Lord Mandelson
Saqib Bhatti contributed 15 speeches (2,394 words)
Wednesday 4th February 2026 - Commons Chamber
Cabinet Office


Written Answers
Extracurricular Activities
Asked by: Saqib Bhatti (Conservative - Meriden and Solihull East)
Tuesday 24th February 2026

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what action she is taking to ensure that learning from the Enrichment Partnerships Pilot informs the upcoming Enrichment Expansion Programme.

Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)

DCMS, in partnership with DfE, will invest £22.5 million over 3 years to enable up to 400 schools across England to deliver a youth-voice led, tailored enrichment offer. This funding will help schools meet the Enrichment Framework benchmarks and ensure disadvantaged pupils have access to good enrichment activities, supporting their wellbeing, personal development, and life skills.

Learnings from the evaluation of the Enrichment Partnerships Pilot, as well as the feedback received from representatives across the enrichment sector, are informing the design and development of the Enrichment Expansion Programme.

Government Department: Marketing
Asked by: Saqib Bhatti (Conservative - Meriden and Solihull East)
Wednesday 25th February 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what the cost to the public purse was of rebranding from HM Government to UK Government.

Answered by Nick Thomas-Symonds - Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office

I refer the Hon. Member to the answer given to questions HL14450, HL14451 and HL14452.

Sodium Valproate and Surgical Mesh Implants: Compensation
Asked by: Saqib Bhatti (Conservative - Meriden and Solihull East)
Thursday 5th March 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of introducing a national redress scheme for those harmed by valproate and pelvic mesh.

Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Government is carefully considering the valuable work done by the Patient Safety Commissioner and the resulting Hughes Report, which sets out options for redress for those harmed by sodium valproate and pelvic mesh. This is a complex issue, and the Government's priority is to ensure that any response is fair, balanced and sensitive to those affected.

The Department is carefully considering the recommendations within the Hughes Report, including the merits of any potential redress scheme, in collaboration with relevant departments, and we aim to provide an update in due course.