To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Eating Disorders: Mental Health Services
Thursday 16th April 2026

Asked by: Samantha Niblett (Labour - South Derbyshire)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to (a) address threshold‑based exclusion in adult eating disorder services,(b) reduce funding disparities between child and adult eating disorder services, and (c) strengthen safeguarding procedures for adults who are declined treatment despite clinically significant medical risk.

Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

Eating disorders are serious mental illnesses that have enduring physical and psychological impacts. This is compounded by known difficulties accessing timely, consistent, and appropriate care across the system. The Government has set out its long-term approach to mental health reform as part of the 10-Year Health Plan for the National Health Service. This plan is built around three key shifts, from hospital to community, from sickness to prevention, and from analogue to digital, all of which are essential to improving care for those with eating disorders.

In January, NHS England published long-awaited updated commissioning guidance for children and young people’s eating disorder services. The guidance takes a whole-pathway approach, prioritising community-based care, earlier identification and intervention, and better integration with schools, colleges, and primary care.

Specialised adult eating disorder inpatient services are not commissioned based on fixed thresholds. Admission decisions are made by multidisciplinary clinical teams following a comprehensive assessment of clinical risk, including physical health, psychiatric presentation, rate of deterioration, and wider social factors. Body mass index may inform clinical assessment but is not used in isolation to determine access to inpatient care.

Integrated care boards (ICBs) commission services across the full pathway, including both adult and children and young people’s provision. This enables resources to be allocated at a system level based on population need, with specialised inpatient services forming part of a broader continuum of care.

Where individuals are not admitted to specialised inpatient services, responsibility for ongoing care and risk management remains with local clinical teams under ICB commissioning arrangements. Safeguarding is managed through established NHS and statutory multi-agency frameworks, ensuring that individuals at risk continue to receive appropriate oversight and support.

Specialised inpatient services operate as part of an integrated system, with NHS Led Provider Collaboratives supporting coordinated care and clinically led decision-making based on individual need.


Division Vote (Commons)
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 245 Labour Aye votes vs 4 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 139
Division Vote (Commons)
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 144
Division Vote (Commons)
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169
Division Vote (Commons)
15 Apr 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 247 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 256 Noes - 150
Division Vote (Commons)
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 274 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 73
Division Vote (Commons)
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 70
Division Vote (Commons)
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90
Division Vote (Commons)
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 241 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 157
Division Vote (Commons)
15 Apr 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Samantha Niblett (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101