All 3 Debates between Sajid Javid and Danny Alexander

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Sajid Javid and Danny Alexander
Tuesday 6th September 2011

(13 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Danny Alexander Portrait Danny Alexander
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The £250 increase applies to all work forces under ministerial control, and it was introduced this year. It will be carried through again next year to ensure that people on low incomes in the public sector continue to receive a pay rise.

Sajid Javid Portrait Sajid Javid (Bromsgrove) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Will the Chief Secretary to the Treasury assure us that, in drawing up plans on public sector pay, the Treasury has not been impeded by a brutal regime in No. 10 Downing street?

Comprehensive Spending Review

Debate between Sajid Javid and Danny Alexander
Thursday 28th October 2010

(14 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Danny Alexander Portrait Danny Alexander
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Outlandish predictions by politicians were the prerogative of the previous Government. We have established an independent Office for Budget Responsibility to make forecasts. We do not make the forecasts, and I am merely quoting what the OBR had to say.

Sajid Javid Portrait Sajid Javid (Bromsgrove) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Does my right hon. Friend agree that the biggest risk to our economy is the record deficit of 10% of GDP, the highest in the G20? Had we not taken action, that would have posed a big risk and we would have lost more than 490,000 jobs. Opposition Members should think about the jobs that we would have lost had the Government not taken decisive action.

Danny Alexander Portrait Danny Alexander
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I agree wholeheartedly with my hon. Friend. If we had not tackled the deficit, the poor in this country would have suffered most.

Public Spending

Debate between Sajid Javid and Danny Alexander
Thursday 17th June 2010

(14 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Danny Alexander Portrait Danny Alexander
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman knows perfectly well that, in the context of renewing the deterrent, the coalition has agreed a value-for-money review. In the context of that, spending £67 million on long-lead items in advance of the value-for-money review being completed would be utterly irresponsible.

Sajid Javid Portrait Sajid Javid (Bromsgrove) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I thank the Chief Secretary for outlining Labour’s cuts. Will he take this opportunity to remind the House just why we face such a difficult spending round?

Danny Alexander Portrait Danny Alexander
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are facing a difficult spending round for two reasons: first, we have the largest peacetime budget deficit since the war—£155 billion—with an 8% structural deficit, which is larger than had previously been estimated; and secondly, the previous Government took irresponsible spending decisions at the end of their time in office and that has added to the pressure on Departments in the spending review. I am seeking to relieve that pressure in today’s statement.