To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.

Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Commons)
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Ruth Cadbury (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 238 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 133
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Ruth Cadbury (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 249 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 130
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Ruth Cadbury (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 252 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 128
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Ruth Cadbury (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 254 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 268 Noes - 78
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Ruth Cadbury (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 128
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Ruth Cadbury (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 251 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 129
Division Vote (Commons)
13 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context
Ruth Cadbury (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 250 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 254 Noes - 135
Division Vote (Commons)
12 Nov 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context
Ruth Cadbury (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 306 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 101 Noes - 316
Division Vote (Commons)
12 Nov 2025 - Energy - View Vote Context
Ruth Cadbury (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 315 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 336
Written Question
Visas: Applications
Tuesday 4th November 2025

Asked by: Ruth Cadbury (Labour - Brentford and Isleworth)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of her Department's average response time for priority visa applications.

Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)

UK Visas & Immigration (UKVI) are currently processing Priority Visa (PV) applications within published customer service standards for straightforward applications. Information on applicable routes and processing times is available at: Get a faster decision on your visa or settlement application: Applying for a faster decision - GOV.UK

It may however take longer to process an application if:

  • the information in the application is not accurate or needs more consideration
  • further evidence needs to be provided, for example evidence of funds
  • supporting documents need to be verified
  • an interview is required
  • we need more information on personal circumstances (for example if there is a criminal conviction)

The UKVI Customer Service Standard performance can be found on the GOV.UK website, including PV applications: Migration transparency data - GOV.UK