To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Child Rearing
Wednesday 1st May 2024

Asked by: Rupa Huq (Labour - Ealing Central and Acton)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps he is taking with Cabinet colleagues to help tackle parental alienation.

Answered by Mike Freer - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The Government does not recognise the concept of “parental alienation” and does not accept that it is a syndrome capable of diagnosis.

In his judgment in the case of Re C the President of the Family Division detailed that the courts focus should be on the “identification of ‘alienating behaviour’” rather than seeking “to determine whether the label ‘parental alienation’ can be applied”. In providing advice to the court, Cafcass does not recognise “parental alienation” and instead looks at the individual behaviours of a parent. In cases where a child is resistant, or refuses, to see a parent Cafcass Family Court Advisers must first consider whether domestic abuse or other forms of harmful parenting are a contributing factor.

The Government is aware of concerns of about unregulated “parental alienation” experts being instructed in the family courts. To address this issue, we are working with the Family Procedure Rule Committee to make changes to the Family Procedure Rules and their associated Practice Directions to prevent the instruction of these unregulated experts.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 30 Apr 2024
Oral Answers to Questions

Speech Link

View all Rupa Huq (Lab - Ealing Central and Acton) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Division Vote (Commons)
30 Apr 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Rupa Huq (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 99 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 163
Division Vote (Commons)
30 Apr 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Rupa Huq (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 103 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 162
Division Vote (Commons)
30 Apr 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Rupa Huq (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 102 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 274 Noes - 162
Division Vote (Commons)
30 Apr 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Rupa Huq (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 102 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 161
Division Vote (Commons)
30 Apr 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Rupa Huq (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 102 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 159
Speech in Westminster Hall - Mon 29 Apr 2024
Assisted Dying

Speech Link

View all Rupa Huq (Lab - Ealing Central and Acton) contributions to the debate on: Assisted Dying

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 25 Apr 2024
Oral Answers to Questions

Speech Link

View all Rupa Huq (Lab - Ealing Central and Acton) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 25 Apr 2024
Oral Answers to Questions

Speech Link

View all Rupa Huq (Lab - Ealing Central and Acton) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions