Arthur Labinjo-Hughes Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Education

Arthur Labinjo-Hughes

Rosie Winterton Excerpts
Monday 6th December 2021

(2 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Rosie Winterton Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Dame Rosie Winterton)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

Is the point of order relevant to the statement and the exchanges that have just taken place?

Diane Abbott Portrait Ms Abbott
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I believe so, Madam Deputy Speaker.

In response to my question about resources, the Secretary of State for Education implied, certainly, that he would be willing to support any recommendations on finance made by the MacAlister review. However, the Secretary of State would have known perfectly well that his Department has signed a contract with MacAlister which says that he cannot “assume” any additional Government funding, that any recommendations about funding must be matched by savings elsewhere in Government over a period, and that any recommendations must be “affordable” to Government. How can the Secretary of State assure the House that he is willing to support recommendations of extra money when the contract that his Department has signed would seem to imply that any such recommendations would not be acceptable?

Rosie Winterton Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Dame Rosie Winterton)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I thank the right hon. Lady, but that is not actually a point of order for the Chair. Obviously, it has enabled her to put her point on record and to seek any clarification on the details of the Secretary of State’s reply to her, on which he may wish to give further information. I am sure that he has heard what she has said, and I know that if he feels he has anything further to add, he will do so.