Code of Conduct: Consultation Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Code of Conduct: Consultation

Rosie Winterton Excerpts
Thursday 2nd December 2021

(2 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate
Chris Bryant Portrait Chris Bryant
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think that the questions asked thus far have made it evident that we need a full debate so that people can make speeches. The sooner we have that in the new year the better, and I will listen to all the comments people make.

I have lots of views about the ministerial code, but it is not the business of our Committee to have views about the ministerial code. That is a matter for another Committee, and we have touched on it only tangentially. As it happens, however, it does seem odd to me that a series of actions by a Member could get them taken through the ICGS process for bullying, but if done as a Minister within their Department would lead to no sanction whatsoever. In the end, I think that brings the whole of politics into disrepute. However, as I say, that is not a matter for the code of conduct. We are only interested in regulating Members’ performance in their duties as Members.

Rosie Winterton Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Dame Rosie Winterton)
- Hansard - -

I reiterate that these are supposed to be fairly short, concise questions, including from the Front Bench. Debates will come later.

Pete Wishart Portrait Pete Wishart (Perth and North Perthshire) (SNP)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I congratulate the hon. Member for Rhondda (Chris Bryant) and his Committee on a very good and worthwhile report. He is right that all the issues need to be properly debated, and we should be able to do that as soon as possible. This report has been constructed and designed in the white heat of unprecedented public interest in the standards of this House, which I am sure has added to the pressure of his deliberations over the past few weeks. I have a number of issues with it, which we do not have time to go into now—that is why we need a debate. I will discuss the matter privately with him, and I know he will be open to that meeting, because there are certain things I want to get clarity on.

One thing I ask the hon. Gentleman about at this stage is appeals. With all due respect, I think he has been pushed into this by Conservative Back Benchers and because of the very keen interest in how the debates have been shaped over the past few weeks. He is absolutely right, and he should stick to this, that what his Committee does is an appeals process. That is exactly what happens. I have great concerns about this being conflated—

Pete Wishart Portrait Pete Wishart
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thought I had a minute, Madam Deputy Speaker. Is that not right?

--- Later in debate ---
Rosie Winterton Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Dame Rosie Winterton)
- Hansard - -

They are supposed to be fairly short questions, including from the Front Bench.

Pete Wishart Portrait Pete Wishart
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

All I will say is to be careful about conflating this process with sexual harassment. Sexual harassment is significantly different from conduct on propriety, and we have to be careful not to conflate the two. I know the staff are concerned about that, so, as an early point, I ask the hon. Member for Rhondda to think very carefully about bringing those two things together. They are significantly different.