Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Leader of the House

Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill

Roger Williams Excerpts
Wednesday 20th October 2010

(14 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Roger Williams Portrait Roger Williams (Brecon and Radnorshire) (LD)
- Hansard - -

I have listened to the hon. Gentleman’s argument against 600 seats, but I do not think that I understand his argument for 650 seats, other than that it would give the Labour party an advantage. Is that a partisan argument?

Chris Bryant Portrait Chris Bryant
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Actually, staying at 650 gives the Conservative party more of an advantage.

I was about to argue that we should not cut the number of seats. I would prefer a situation in which we did not fix the total at any particular number: that is why we have framed our amendment as we have. In addition, it is important not to cut the number of Members.

--- Later in debate ---
I will just say—although I hate to get a small cheer—one final thing. [Hon. Members: “Hooray!”] You see, they are like Pavlov’s dogs—just give them the line and they will slobber. I understand why the Prime Minister went into the general election saying that he wanted to make politics cheaper and that cutting the number of Members of Parliament would somehow restore British democracy. I understand the background against which that happened; all of us who were in the previous Parliament know the scars that this House bears because of the expenses scandal, which still rumbles on in its own way. However, it is wrong always to go down the populist line in matters of constitutional decorum, particularly the number of Members of Parliament. If we have a perfect mathematical equation for delineating the boundaries, we will end up making MPs less accessible to the public and less able to influence and be involved in decisions in their local communities. It will be more difficult for ordinary members of the public to understand who their MP is and have a relationship with them. Far from improving democracy in this country, that will undermine it further.
Roger Williams Portrait Roger Williams
- Hansard - -

If an electorate of 85,000 is reduced to 75,000, how does that make it more difficult for a constituent to contact his MP? Surely every MP should be equally available to their constituents.

Chris Bryant Portrait Chris Bryant
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman represents an area in Wales part of which, I guess, may end up in a constituency that is very large.

Roger Williams Portrait Roger Williams
- Hansard - -

It used to be larger.

Chris Bryant Portrait Chris Bryant
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That did not make it better, and it was larger in an era when the expectations of a Member of Parliament to be present and available were much reduced. There was a time when MPs, when they visited their constituencies—once a year—were greeted with a brass band. That is not true today. [Interruption.] It is certainly not true for me, and I can see that it is not true for anybody else either.