Debates between Roger Gale and Lindsay Hoyle during the 2017-2019 Parliament

Tue 16th Oct 2018
Overseas Electors Bill: Money
Commons Chamber

Money resolution: House of Commons

Overseas Electors Bill: Money

Debate between Roger Gale and Lindsay Hoyle
Roger Gale Portrait Sir Roger Gale (North Thanet) (Con)
- Hansard - -

May we return for a moment to my old friend Harry Shindler? He is 97 years old and has lived in Italy for much of his life, but he is stoically British. He fought at Anzio, where he watched his friends die, and has since sought to establish memorials to them, and he has been honoured for so doing. Furthermore, he is not one of the oldest members, but the oldest member of the Labour party. Can my hon. Friend suggest any reason why the Labour party would want to prevent that old man from voting?

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker (Sir Lindsay Hoyle)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. We need to stick to the money resolution, as you should know better than anyone, Sir Roger. I want to get on with this, so please can we deal with what is in hand? I do not expect the Minister to be driven off course.

Defence Industry and Shipbuilding

Debate between Roger Gale and Lindsay Hoyle
Wednesday 11th July 2018

(6 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Roger Gale Portrait Sir Roger Gale (North Thanet) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I may have misunderstood—

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker (Sir Lindsay Hoyle)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. The Minister will have to sit down.

Lindsay Hoyle Portrait Mr Deputy Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Order. I don’t care what the Minister thinks he is doing; I am just telling him what he has to do.

Roger Gale Portrait Sir Roger Gale
- Hansard - -

Thank you, Mr Deputy Speaker.

I may have misunderstood the Minister, and I know it is not the custom to ask a question to which one does not know the answer, but I think he said that royal naval ships were confined to aircraft carriers, frigates and destroyers. Would that not also apply to any replacement amphibious craft that we might need?[Official Report, 24 July 2018, Vol. 645, c. 8MC.]