Debates between Richard Burgon and Matt Warman during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Tue 28th Mar 2017
Prisons and Courts Bill (First sitting)
Public Bill Committees

Committee Debate: 1st Sitting: House of Commons

Prisons and Courts Bill (First sitting)

Debate between Richard Burgon and Matt Warman
Committee Debate: 1st Sitting: House of Commons
Tuesday 28th March 2017

(7 years, 8 months ago)

Public Bill Committees
Read Full debate Prisons and Courts Bill 2016-17 View all Prisons and Courts Bill 2016-17 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Public Bill Committee Amendments as at 28 March 2017 - (28 Mar 2017)
Matt Warman Portrait Matt Warman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Q ROTL is routine at somewhere like North Sea Camp—that demonstrates the variation across the estate currently.

Rachel O'Brien: Absolutely.

Richard Burgon Portrait Richard Burgon (Leeds East) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Q I want to return to the subject of staffing. The Minister mentioned the 6:1 ratio in terms of staff caseloads; I want to raise a different ratio. We have already heard about the 7,000 reduction in prison officers since 2010. We have also heard about the aim to have a 2,500 increase. On Second Reading, there was some discussion in the Chamber of the need for prison staff to prisoner ratios. In their experience, do panel members think this could be helpful—a ratio of prison officers to inmates?

Martin Lomas: It might, but I am not sure. It is quite a crude measure, and what matters is the outcome and whether there is a quality to the supervision—that prisoners have confidence in the staff around them, that the staff around them are effective and trained, as has already been referred to, and that those prison officers, in a sense, are confident in what they are doing. I think it might be useful, but equally prisons are endlessly complex, have differing requirements, face differing risks, and have different geography, which will all inform the numbers of people you will need.