To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Broadcasting: Disclosure of Information
Friday 6th February 2026

Asked by: Rebecca Long Bailey (Labour - Salford)

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what external oversight mechanisms are in place to ensure that publicly owned broadcasters investigate whistleblowing concerns independently of senior management.

Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

Our public service broadcasters are operationally independent of Government and so probationary periods rightfully remain a matter for them.

Employees of public service broadcasters, like most employees in Great Britain, who blow the whistle on certain types of wrongdoing are protected from retaliatory unfair dismissal and detriment under the Employment Rights Act 1996 if legislative conditions are met. This is a day one right, meaning employees do not need to satisfy any qualifying period of service to seek remedies in employment tribunals.

Employees of publicly owned broadcasters will be protected if they blow the whistle to Ofcom, the independent media regulator, if certain conditions in the legislation are met. Ofcom is a ‘prescribed person’ under the Public Interest Disclosure (Prescribed Person Order) 2014. The Government is also exploring the addition of the Creative Industries Independent Standards Authority (CIISA) to this list and the Secretary of State continues to call on the television sector and wider creative industries to support the work of CIISA to improve standards of behaviour across industry.


Written Question
Broadcasting: Disclosure of Information
Friday 6th February 2026

Asked by: Rebecca Long Bailey (Labour - Salford)

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment she has made of trends in the use of extension of probationary periods in publicly owned broadcasters to detriment whistleblowing employees.

Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

Our public service broadcasters are operationally independent of Government and so probationary periods rightfully remain a matter for them.

Employees of public service broadcasters, like most employees in Great Britain, who blow the whistle on certain types of wrongdoing are protected from retaliatory unfair dismissal and detriment under the Employment Rights Act 1996 if legislative conditions are met. This is a day one right, meaning employees do not need to satisfy any qualifying period of service to seek remedies in employment tribunals.

Employees of publicly owned broadcasters will be protected if they blow the whistle to Ofcom, the independent media regulator, if certain conditions in the legislation are met. Ofcom is a ‘prescribed person’ under the Public Interest Disclosure (Prescribed Person Order) 2014. The Government is also exploring the addition of the Creative Industries Independent Standards Authority (CIISA) to this list and the Secretary of State continues to call on the television sector and wider creative industries to support the work of CIISA to improve standards of behaviour across industry.


Written Question
Members: Correspondence
Thursday 5th February 2026

Asked by: Rebecca Long Bailey (Labour - Salford)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when he plans to respond to correspondence from the hon. Member for Salford of 30 October 2025 on deaths in custody and prison management at HMP Forest Bank, reference number MC128673.

Answered by Jake Richards - Assistant Whip

The Department apologises for the delay in responding on this occasion and we regret that this falls short of expected standards. We are prioritising this and a response will be issued within the coming week.


Division Vote (Commons)
4 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context
Rebecca Long Bailey (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 316 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 392 Noes - 116
Written Question
Broadcasting: Disclosure of Information
Wednesday 4th February 2026

Asked by: Rebecca Long Bailey (Labour - Salford)

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment she has made of the effectiveness of whistleblowing protections for employees of publicly owned broadcasters under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998.

Answered by Ian Murray - Minister of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

Our public service broadcasters, publicly owned or otherwise, rightfully remain independent of Government, but their employees like most in Great Britain are protected under the whistleblowing framework in the Employment Rights Act 1996 (as amended by the Public Interest and Disclosure Act 1998). This protects employees from detriment and dismissal if they blow the whistle on wrongdoing and certain conditions in the legislation are met.

More broadly, the Government acknowledges concerns that the UK whistleblowing framework may not be operating as effectively as it should be and recently announced, through the Anti-Corruption Strategy 2025, that it will explore opportunities to reform that framework.


Division Vote (Commons)
3 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context
Rebecca Long Bailey (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 358 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 458 Noes - 104
MP Financial Interest
Rebecca Long Bailey (Labour - Salford)
Original Source (2nd February 2026)
2. Donations and other support (including loans) for activities as an MP
Key Cities (Network) - £1,667.00

Speech in Westminster Hall - Mon 02 Feb 2026
Indefinite Leave to Remain

"There are few people who are opposed to a robust and fair immigration system, but sadly these plans are not that. They would rip up the promise on which people built their lives. For workers who were asked to come here to fill skills gaps in our public services and …..."
Rebecca Long Bailey - View Speech

View all Rebecca Long Bailey (Lab - Salford) contributions to the debate on: Indefinite Leave to Remain

Speech in Westminster Hall - Mon 02 Feb 2026
Indefinite Leave to Remain

"I am sorry, but I want everybody to have time to speak.

Worse still, the changes would apply retrospectively. Nurses, social care staff and council workers who came here under one set of rules would suddenly find the goalposts moved or, worse, find they could be deported due to harsher …..."

Rebecca Long Bailey - View Speech

View all Rebecca Long Bailey (Lab - Salford) contributions to the debate on: Indefinite Leave to Remain

Division Vote (Commons)
28 Jan 2026 - Youth Unemployment - View Vote Context
Rebecca Long Bailey (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 280 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 287