Rachel Hopkins - Alert Sample

Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Rachel Hopkins

Information between 1st March 2026 - 21st March 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.

Division Votes
2 Mar 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 327 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 410
10 Mar 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 10 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 203
10 Mar 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 308 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 311
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 163
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 173
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 106
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 182
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 315 Noes - 109
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 171
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 181
9 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 177
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 161
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 292
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 279 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 283
11 Mar 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 286 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 292
18 Mar 2026 - Employment Rights: Investigatory Powers - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 368 Noes - 107
18 Mar 2026 - Student Loans - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 266
18 Mar 2026 - Higher Education Fees - View Vote Context Rachel Hopkins voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 19 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 277 Noes - 98

Speeches
Rachel Hopkins speeches from: Rural Roads Rachel Hopkins contributed 1 speech (190 words) Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Westminster Hall HM Treasury
Rachel Hopkins speeches from: Defending Democracy Taskforce Rachel Hopkins contributed 1 speech (130 words) Thursday 12th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office
Rachel Hopkins speeches from: Marriage Regulations Rachel Hopkins contributed 1 speech (36 words) Thursday 12th March 2026 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Justice
Rachel Hopkins speeches from: Carnivals Rachel Hopkins contributed 1 speech (814 words) Thursday 12th March 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport

Rachel Hopkins mentioned

Live Transcript
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.
12 Mar 2026, 12:36 p.m. - House of Commons "him should he wish to discuss these matters further. >> Rachel Hopkins thank you, Madam. >> Speaker, and I should. " Dan Jarvis MP, The Minister of State, Home Department (Barnsley North, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript

Parliamentary Debates
Rural Roads 89 speeches (9,500 words) Tuesday 17th March 2026 - Westminster Hall HM Treasury Mentions: 1: Lilian Greenwood (Lab - Nottingham South) Friend the Member for Luton South and South Bedfordshire (Rachel Hopkins) on accountability.The transparency - Link to Speech
Marriage Regulations 15 speeches (5,243 words) Thursday 12th March 2026 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Justice Mentions: 1: David Mundell (Con - Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale) Member for Luton South and South Bedfordshire (Rachel Hopkins) has already referred to the opportunity - Link to Speech 2: Kieran Mullan (Con - Bexhill and Battle) Member for Luton South and South Bedfordshire (Rachel Hopkins), because I have a lot of sympathy for - Link to Speech 3: Sarah Sackman (Lab - Finchley and Golders Green) Friend the Member for Luton South and South Bedfordshire (Rachel Hopkins) and the hon. - Link to Speech
Carnivals 23 speeches (8,898 words) Thursday 12th March 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport Mentions: 1: Victoria Collins (LD - Harpenden and Berkhamsted) Member for Luton South and South Bedfordshire (Rachel Hopkins) is not far away from my patch. - Link to Speech 2: Ashley Fox (Con - Bridgwater) Member for Luton South and South Bedfordshire (Rachel Hopkins) for reminding us that there are thriving - Link to Speech 3: Stephanie Peacock (Lab - Barnsley South) Friend the Member for Luton South and South Bedfordshire (Rachel Hopkins) spoke about the history in - Link to Speech

Select Committee Documents
Thursday 19th March 2026 Special Report - 1st Special Report – Access to the House of Commons and its procedures: House Administration Response Modernisation Committee Found: Daniel Francis (Labour; Bexleyheath and Crayford) Paulette Hamilton (Labour; Birmingham Erdington) Rachel Hopkins
Thursday 19th March 2026 Special Report - Large Print – 1st Special Report – Access to the House of Commons and its procedures: House Administration Response Modernisation Committee Found: Daniel Francis (Labour; Bexleyheath and Crayford) Paulette Hamilton (Labour; Birmingham Erdington) Rachel Hopkins
Tuesday 17th March 2026 Report - 2nd Report - Appointment of a nominated Electoral Commissioner Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission Found: Scottish National Party; Arbroath and Broughty Ferry) Simon Hoare MP (Conservative; North Dorset) Rachel Hopkins
Thursday 12th March 2026 Written Evidence - MP for Luton South and South Bedfordshire CLR0146 - Pre-legislative scrutiny of the draft Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill Pre-legislative scrutiny of the draft Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill - Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee Found: Written evidence submitted by Rachel Hopkins MP [CLR 146] I greatly welcome the government’s draft
Wednesday 11th March 2026 Oral Evidence - Electoral Commission, Electoral Commission, and Electoral Commission Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission Found: meeting Members present: Sir Lindsay Hoyle (Chair); Samantha Dixon; Stephen Gethins; Simon Hoare; Rachel Hopkins
Wednesday 11th March 2026 Oral Evidence - Local Government Boundary Commission for England, and Local Government Boundary Commission for England Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission Found: meeting Members present: Sir Lindsay Hoyle (Chair); Samantha Dixon; Stephen Gethins; Simon Hoare; Rachel Hopkins

Rachel Hopkins - Select Committee Information

Calendar
Wednesday 11th March 2026 3 p.m. Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission - Oral evidence Subject: Local Government Boundary Commission for England and Electoral Commission: Main Estimates for 2026-27 At 3:15pm: Oral evidence Beverley Smith - Chair at Local Government Boundary Commission for England Ailsa Irvine - Chief Executive at Local Government Boundary Commission for England At 3:45pm: Oral evidence John Pullinger CB - Chair at Electoral Commission Vijay Rangarajan CMG - Chief Executive at Electoral Commission Chris Pleass - Corporate Director at Electoral Commission View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 21st April 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar
Tuesday 19th May 2026 11:30 a.m. Modernisation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar

Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 11th March 2026 Oral Evidence - Local Government Boundary Commission for England, and Local Government Boundary Commission for England Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission
Wednesday 11th March 2026 Oral Evidence - Electoral Commission, Electoral Commission, and Electoral Commission Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission
Monday 16th March 2026 Correspondence - Letter from Ailsa Irvine, CEO, LGBCE, to Mr Speaker, regarding the LGBCE’s supplementary estimate 2025/26, dated 11 January 2026. Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission
Monday 16th March 2026 Correspondence - Letter from Vijay Rangarjan CMG, CEO, Electoral Commission to Mr Speaker, regarding the Commission’s supplementary estimate 2025/26, dated 11 January 2026. Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission
Tuesday 17th March 2026 Report - 2nd Report - Appointment of a nominated Electoral Commissioner Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission
Thursday 19th March 2026 Special Report - 1st Special Report – Access to the House of Commons and its procedures: House Administration Response Modernisation Committee
Thursday 19th March 2026 Special Report - Easy Read – 1st Special Report – Access to the House of Commons and its procedures: House Administration Response Modernisation Committee
Thursday 19th March 2026 Special Report - Large Print – 1st Special Report – Access to the House of Commons and its procedures: House Administration Response Modernisation Committee
Thursday 19th March 2026 Special Report - Easy Read Annex A – 1st Special Report – Access to the House of Commons and its procedures: House Administration Response Modernisation Committee
Monday 30th March 2026 Estimate memoranda - Electoral Commission’s Main Supply Estimate 2026/27 memorandum Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission
Monday 30th March 2026 Estimate memoranda - Local Government Boundary Commission for England's (LGBCE) Main Supply Estimate for 2026/27 Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission
Monday 30th March 2026 Estimate memoranda - Electoral Commission’s Main Supply Estimate for 2026/27 Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission
Monday 30th March 2026 Estimate memoranda - Local Government Boundary Commission for England's (LGBCE) Main Supply Estimate 2026/27 memorandum Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission
Monday 30th March 2026 Correspondence - Letter from Beverley Smith, Chair, LGBCE, on Business Plan and Main Supply Estimate 2026/27, dated 11 February 2026 Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission
Tuesday 10th March 2026 Minutes and decisions - Summary of Committee’s meeting on 10 February 2026 Modernisation Committee

Select Committee Inquiry
16 Mar 2026 Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee Debates Modernisation Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The cross-party Modernisation Committee is holding an inquiry into Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee debates, as part of its ongoing work on how time is used in the Commons. Backbench Business Committee debates offer MPs a vital route to raise issues on behalf of their constituents, and since its establishment the Committee has ensured that backbench voices are heard regularly. The Petitions Committee has facilitated many debates on e-petitions started by members of the public, ensuring that issues with significant public support are brought before the House. Many of these debates have helped raise the profile of important issues and, in some cases, led to tangible action being taken. The Modernisation Committee’s inquiry will look at whether the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates is appropriate and effective. It will also explore other issues such as whether some e-petitions debates should take place in the Chamber on a more regular basis. MPs on the Committee will also explore the issues highlighted in the Backbench Business Committee’s 15 anniversary report, and how the House can continue to support and strengthen the Committee’s work. Terms of Reference The Backbench Business Committee has 35 days allotted in each session for proceedings in the Chamber/Westminster Hall on backbench business, of which at least 27 should be in the Chamber. More information can be found on their website. The Petitions Committee can schedule a petition or petitions for debate in Westminster Hall on a Monday from 4.30pm, for up to three hours. More information is available here. We will be exploring the following questions as part of our inquiry: 1. Is the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates appropriate and effective? What impact, if any, does the timing and scheduling of debates have on attendance? 2. Are the 35 days allocated to the Backbench Business Committee appropriate in the context of other demands on the House’s time? 3. Is the current allocation of Backbench Business debates between the Chamber (27 days) and Westminster Hall (8 days) correct? 4. Are there any improvements that could be made to the Backbench Business Committee’s process to agree applications for backbench business debates (including ensuring debates are popular amongst members and on topical subjects)? 5. Are the existing mechanisms available for the Petitions Committee to hold debates in the Chamber (to apply via Backbench Business Committee, or to be allocated time by the Government) sufficient or should the Petitions Committee have guaranteed time in the Chamber?

Select Committee Inquiry

16 Mar 2026
Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee Debates
Modernisation Committee (Select)
Not accepting submissions

The cross-party Modernisation Committee is holding an inquiry into Backbench Business Committee and Petitions Committee debates, as part of its ongoing work on how time is used in the Commons.

Backbench Business Committee debates offer MPs a vital route to raise issues on behalf of their constituents, and since its establishment the Committee has ensured that backbench voices are heard regularly.

The Petitions Committee has facilitated many debates on e-petitions started by members of the public, ensuring that issues with significant public support are brought before the House. Many of these debates have helped raise the profile of important issues and, in some cases, led to tangible action being taken.

The Modernisation Committee’s inquiry will look at whether the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates is appropriate and effective. It will also explore other issues such as whether some e-petitions debates should take place in the Chamber on a more regular basis.

MPs on the Committee will also explore the issues highlighted in the Backbench Business Committee’s 15 anniversary report, and how the House can continue to support and strengthen the Committee’s work.

Terms of Reference

The Backbench Business Committee has 35 days allotted in each session for proceedings in the Chamber/Westminster Hall on backbench business, of which at least 27 should be in the Chamber. More information can be found on their website. The Petitions Committee can schedule a petition or petitions for debate in Westminster Hall on a Monday from 4.30pm, for up to three hours. More information is available here.

We will be exploring the following questions as part of our inquiry:

1. Is the current allocation of time for Petitions and Backbench Business debates appropriate and effective?

What impact, if any, does the timing and scheduling of debates have on attendance?
2. Are the 35 days allocated to the Backbench Business Committee appropriate in the context of other demands on the House’s time?

3. Is the current allocation of Backbench Business debates between the Chamber (27 days) and Westminster Hall (8 days) correct?

4. Are there any improvements that could be made to the Backbench Business Committee’s process to agree applications for backbench business debates (including ensuring debates are popular amongst members and on topical subjects)?

5. Are the existing mechanisms available for the Petitions Committee to hold debates in the Chamber (to apply via Backbench Business Committee, or to be allocated time by the Government) sufficient or should the Petitions Committee have guaranteed time in the Chamber?