Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Rachael Maskell and Lucy Frazer
Tuesday 13th November 2018

(6 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Rachael Maskell Portrait Rachael Maskell (York Central) (Lab/Co-op)
- Hansard - -

8. What assessment he has made of the effect on the earnings of barristers of recent changes to criminal legal aid fees.

Lucy Frazer Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Lucy Frazer)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Criminal barristers play a fundamental role in ensuring access to justice, often for the most vulnerable in our society. Having already increased their fees by £9 million in April this year, we launched a consultation on a proposal to increase fees by a further £15 million. That consultation has recently closed, and we are carefully considering the responses.

Rachael Maskell Portrait Rachael Maskell
- Hansard - -

Our justice system depends on proper legal representation. A constituent of mine, a dedicated and experienced barrister, works 15 hours a day, six to seven days a week. Two years ago, he earned £8,000; last year, he struck lucky and earned £26,000. Will the Minister commit to honouring the letter and spirit of the advocates’ graduated fees scheme, and make sure it has an early review?

Lucy Frazer Portrait Lucy Frazer
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Lord Chancellor and I take very seriously the importance of having a system of advocates that represents people, and we value the independent Bar as well as the employed Bar. I met the leaders of the Bar Council last week, as well as the leaders—the chair and the vice-chair—of the Criminal Bar Association to hear their concerns, and we are listening very closely to what they have to say.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Rachael Maskell and Lucy Frazer
Tuesday 24th April 2018

(6 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lucy Frazer Portrait Lucy Frazer
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I know my right hon. Friend cares deeply about this important matter and he has raised it with me several times. Transparency is very important, and we are looking at the pilot. I am happy to update him, and I am looking forward to our meeting tomorrow with the Society of Editors.

Rachael Maskell Portrait Rachael Maskell (York Central) (Lab/Co-op)
- Hansard - -

When a person spends time in custody and the CPS then drops the case against them, as opposed to losing a case in court, they are not entitled to compensation, even when they have lost their home and everything. Does the Minister agree that that is a huge injustice? Will she say what she is doing about it?

Lucy Frazer Portrait Lucy Frazer
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Lady raises an interesting issue and I would very much like to discuss it with her.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Rachael Maskell and Lucy Frazer
Tuesday 23rd January 2018

(6 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Rachael Maskell Portrait Rachael Maskell (York Central) (Lab/Co-op)
- Hansard - -

Some women in York have been taken to the family courts on multiple occasions by former partners. This process is clearly being used as a form of emotional abuse, and is highly costly to constituents and the state. What steps is the Minister taking to recognise court abuse, and what actions will she take now?

Lucy Frazer Portrait Lucy Frazer
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Using the court process to further any abuse is completely unacceptable, particularly in relation to domestic abuse. The court can already take actions if it thinks that there is abuse of process, by restricting litigants’ ability to continue with further applications and further claims. New family court rules were introduced in November to make sure that vulnerable court users get the support they need in courtrooms.