Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Philip Hollobone and Stuart Bell

Monday 26th July 2010 Commons Chamber

[Mr Philip Hollobone (Kettering) (Con)]

6. How much it costs to print early-day motions in 2009-10.

[Sir Stuart Bell (Middlesbrough)]

The cost of publishing early-day motions, including printing, staff time and technical support, was approximately £1 million in the financial year 2009-10. Printing alone accounts for some £776,000.

[Mr Hollobone]

Taxpayers will be shocked by the figures that the hon. Gentleman has just read out to the House. Should this not offer scope for huge cost savings and, hopefully, be another nail in the coffin of the wretched EDM system?

[Sir Stuart Bell]

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for his remarks, and he will be happy to know that from the start of this parliamentary Session older EDMs have not been reprinted weekly, saving 2.5 million sheets of paper and up to £300,000 in printing costs per year.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Philip Hollobone and Stuart Bell

Monday 21st June 2010 Commons Chamber

[Mr Philip Hollobone (Kettering) (Con)]

2. If he will bring forward proposals to introduce low-cost LED lighting across the House of Commons part of the parliamentary estate.

[Sir Stuart Bell (Middlesbrough)]

Several trials of LED technology have been undertaken in the House of Commons, and LED lighting has been installed in the upper Committee corridor, the Commons Library, the Lower Waiting Hall, the New Palace Yard turnstiles and other places. Following those trials, we have included further installations of LED lamps in Parliament’s low-energy lighting programme, such as at 1 Parliament Street and Derby Gate stairwells.

[Mr Hollobone]

I welcome the progress made by the House authorities. Given the fact that LED lighting uses just 5% of the electricity used by normal bulbs, hardly ever needs to be replaced, and contains no mercury, so it can be recycled very healthily, have they given any consideration to lighting Big Ben with LED technology?

[Sir Stuart Bell]

That is an intriguing question so early in the parliamentary Session, and one that the Commission would be happy to look into. As the hon. Gentleman knows, incandescent lighting on the parliamentary estate has been gradually replaced with lower energy lighting over the past five years. The majority of these replacements have occurred during routine lamp changes. Due to the size and complexity of the estate, detailed records of light bulbs are not kept and the proportion of low-energy lamps is not known. However, on the point that the hon. Gentleman makes, we keep developments in lighting technology under review and we will adopt low-energy solutions as they become available.