Beer Duty Rates Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: HM Treasury

Beer Duty Rates

Philip Hollobone Excerpts
Tuesday 25th June 2019

(4 years, 10 months ago)

Westminster Hall
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Westminster Hall is an alternative Chamber for MPs to hold debates, named after the adjoining Westminster Hall.

Each debate is chaired by an MP from the Panel of Chairs, rather than the Speaker or Deputy Speaker. A Government Minister will give the final speech, and no votes may be called on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Philip Hollobone Portrait Mr Philip Hollobone (in the Chair)
- Hansard - -

We now move on to an important debate about differential rates of beer duty. Because of the suspension of the earlier debate for 15 minutes, this debate can run until 4.45 pm. I call Giles Watling to move the motion.

Giles Watling Portrait Giles Watling (Clacton) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I beg to move,

That this House has considered differential rates of beer duty.

It is an honour to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Hollobone. I am extremely grateful for the opportunity to raise, again, the importance of beer duty, and pleased to represent all the constituents who have contacted me to ask that we cut beer duty. It is a campaign I am delighted to support. Although I am certainly a keen supporter, I do not believe that an across-the-board cut in beer duty is the best option, as I shall argue in this speech. That is where a differential rate of beer duty is to be much desired. Simply put, it would differentiate between the duty rates for on-trade sales of beer in pubs and the rates for off-trade sales. I am keen for that proposal to be implemented, so I have written to the Chancellor to seek his support—as the Minister will know, having responded to my letter of 23 April. That was my second letter to the Treasury on the intriguing proposal, in which I carefully responded to the points that the Minister had raised in his reply to my first letter in November 2018.

--- Later in debate ---
Philip Hollobone Portrait Mr Philip Hollobone (in the Chair)
- Hansard - -

Order. Does the hon. Member for Burton have the permission both of the mover of the motion and of the Minister to contribute to the debate?

--- Later in debate ---
Jesse Norman Portrait The Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Jesse Norman)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is a great pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Hollobone. This is an important topic, as hon. Members from across the House have rightly said, which commands widespread interest across not merely the House but the country. In that context, if I may make a small but telling party political point, I wish that the Opposition had been able to field a spokesman to express their view on the matter.

Philip Hollobone Portrait Mr Philip Hollobone (in the Chair)
- Hansard - -

Order. The Opposition are not required to field a spokesman for a half-hour Westminster Hall debate.

Jesse Norman Portrait Jesse Norman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On a point of order, Mr Hollobone. Does that also apply when a debate has been extended beyond half an hour to 45 minutes, as in this case?

Philip Hollobone Portrait Mr Philip Hollobone (in the Chair)
- Hansard - -

That is correct. The Minister is enjoying the benefit of 15 minutes injury time owing to the previous debate not having completed its full passage.