Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Oral Answers to Questions

Phil Wilson Excerpts
Tuesday 10th July 2012

(12 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
The Attorney-General was asked—
Phil Wilson Portrait Phil Wilson (Sedgefield) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

1. What recent assessment he has made of the performance of the Serious Fraud Office.

Jonathan Reynolds Portrait Jonathan Reynolds (Stalybridge and Hyde) (Lab/Co-op)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

8. What recent assessment he has made of the performance of the Serious Fraud Office.

Dominic Grieve Portrait The Attorney-General (Mr Dominic Grieve)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Her Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service inspectorate has been asked to carry out an inspection of the Serious Fraud Office. It is intended that the inspection should assist the new director, and it has been timed accordingly. In my superintendent’s role, I have regular meetings with the director and other senior officials.

Phil Wilson Portrait Phil Wilson
- Hansard - -

The Attorney-General has said that he does not plan to publish the results of the current review into the operation of the Serious Fraud Office. Will he give his reasons for that and reconsider his current plan to keep us and the public in the dark on this issue?

Dominic Grieve Portrait The Attorney-General
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is not accurate to say that I have indicated that the report will not be published. The position is that such reports are not normally published, but due to the unusual and understandable level of interest, I think it important that as much as possible should be put into the public domain. I will make it my business to ensure that that happens. I should explain that the reason it may not be possible to publish all of it is that there have to be safeguards to prevent prejudice to ongoing investigations, but subject to that, I would wish to see the results made available.