Information between 23rd August 2026 - 12th September 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Peter Fortune voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 93 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 411 Noes - 102 |
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Peter Fortune voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 93 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 427 |
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Peter Fortune voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 92 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 410 |
|
2 Sep 2026 - Representation of the People Bill - View Vote Context Peter Fortune voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 91 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 346 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Peter Fortune voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 297 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Plant Health - View Vote Context Peter Fortune voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 100 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Peter Fortune voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 84 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 316 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Peter Fortune voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 357 |
|
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context Peter Fortune voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 88 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 302 |
|
11 Sep 2026 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Peter Fortune voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 90 Conservative No votes vs 17 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 286 |
|
10 Sep 2026 - Social Housing Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Peter Fortune voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 76 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 292 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Peter Fortune speeches from: Media Green Paper
Peter Fortune contributed 1 speech (86 words) Tuesday 8th September 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport |
|
Peter Fortune speeches from: Science Facilities and Laboratories
Peter Fortune contributed 2 speeches (129 words) Tuesday 1st September 2026 - Westminster Hall Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade |
|
Peter Fortune speeches from: UK Financial Services
Peter Fortune contributed 1 speech (59 words) Tuesday 1st September 2026 - Westminster Hall HM Treasury |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Flexible Working: Business Rates
Asked by: Peter Fortune (Conservative - Bromley and Biggin Hill) Monday 7th September 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, why serviced offices which split their hereditament are treated differently to coworking spaces for the purpose of business rates relief. Answered by James Murray - Financial Secretary to the Treasury and Paymaster General The Government has introduced new permanently lower tax multipliers for eligible retail, hospitality and leisure (RHL) properties. These new tax rates provide nearly £1 billion per year of support to the RHL sector and will benefit over 750,000 properties.
The definition of a RHL property is broadly the same as the definition used in the RHL business rates relief, which was devised by the previous Government. For consistency, we have kept the same definition.
The Valuation Office (VO) is responsible for valuing non-domestic property for business rates purposes. They are required to maintain up to date rating lists in England and Wales, and to carry out valuations in line with relevant legislation and case law.
Where the VO is required to determine the unit of assessment, it does so on a case-by-case basis, with all facts being considered. The VO will continue to monitor legal developments relevant to valuation of serviced offices and update its approach as needed. |
|
Flexible Working: Business Rates
Asked by: Peter Fortune (Conservative - Bromley and Biggin Hill) Monday 7th September 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what consideration he has given to the potential merits of extending HRL relief to independent coworking spaces. Answered by James Murray - Financial Secretary to the Treasury and Paymaster General The Government has introduced new permanently lower tax multipliers for eligible retail, hospitality and leisure (RHL) properties. These new tax rates provide nearly £1 billion per year of support to the RHL sector and will benefit over 750,000 properties.
The definition of a RHL property is broadly the same as the definition used in the RHL business rates relief, which was devised by the previous Government. For consistency, we have kept the same definition.
The Valuation Office (VO) is responsible for valuing non-domestic property for business rates purposes. They are required to maintain up to date rating lists in England and Wales, and to carry out valuations in line with relevant legislation and case law.
Where the VO is required to determine the unit of assessment, it does so on a case-by-case basis, with all facts being considered. The VO will continue to monitor legal developments relevant to valuation of serviced offices and update its approach as needed. |