Debates between Pete Wishart and Andrew Stephenson during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Fri 18th Nov 2016

Parliamentary Constituencies (Amendment) Bill

Debate between Pete Wishart and Andrew Stephenson
2nd reading: House of Commons
Friday 18th November 2016

(8 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Parliamentary Constituencies (Amendment) Bill 2016-17 View all Parliamentary Constituencies (Amendment) Bill 2016-17 Debates Read Hansard Text
Pete Wishart Portrait Pete Wishart
- Hansard - -

Yes, we know that. Again and again we have heard from all sorts of Ministers about the need for new civil servants, who are being hastily recruited. The cost of politics is going up, although the Government claim to be cutting it. The only part of politics and Parliament that they are cutting is the elected part. That is the only one that seems to be featuring.

Andrew Stephenson Portrait Andrew Stephenson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I share the hon. Gentleman’s view that the House of Lords should be abolished—I have always believed that. I have tried for reform and I will continue to push for reform and abolition, but does he not accept that the cost of running the House of Lords in 2010 was £112 million and that last year it fell to £96 million? That is a 14% reduction. I am not defending the House of Lords, because I think it should be abolished, but this Government have overseen a reduction in the cost of the House of Lords.

Pete Wishart Portrait Pete Wishart
- Hansard - -

Here is a solution for the hon. Gentleman, given he is halfway towards my position on this: how about saving £100 million per year? Get rid of the circus! Then we are all happy. There are savings here and there, yes, and that is fine, but let us make substantial and significant savings by just getting rid of the monstrous place down the corridor.