Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Paula Sherriff

Main Page: Paula Sherriff (Labour - Dewsbury)

Oral Answers to Questions

Paula Sherriff Excerpts
Thursday 19th November 2015

(9 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Rachael Maskell Portrait Rachael Maskell (York Central) (Lab/Co-op)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

1. What steps she is taking to ensure that the UK meets its EU renewable energy target by 2020.

Paula Sherriff Portrait Paula Sherriff (Dewsbury) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

5. What assessment she has made of the UK’s progress towards meeting its EU renewables target by 2020.

Amber Rudd Portrait The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Amber Rudd)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are making good progress towards our 15% renewable energy target for 2020, and I am confident that we will meet the next interim target of 5.4%, with provisional figures showing that 6.3% of final energy consumption for 2013 and 2014 came from renewable sources.

Amber Rudd Portrait Amber Rudd
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am delighted to say that there will be plenty of opportunities during this Session to talk about Paris, and I look forward to doing so. On the specific question of the renewables target, I repeat to the hon. Lady that we are making good progress at the moment. [Interruption.] There are issues, but we are expecting to exceed our interim target. There is more to do, and I am delighted to say that I am working across Government with the Department for Transport and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs to ensure that we do it.

Paula Sherriff Portrait Paula Sherriff
- Hansard - -

Does the Secretary of State agree that meeting our renewables target should not just prevent catastrophic climate change but benefit UK workers through the creation of green jobs? Will she commit to ensuring that projects such as the Beatrice offshore wind project, which benefit from public funding, create the sorts of skilled supply chain jobs we need rather than subsidising private companies abroad?