Social Enterprises and Community Ownership Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Business and Trade

Social Enterprises and Community Ownership

Paul Waugh Excerpts
Wednesday 18th March 2026

(1 day, 8 hours ago)

Westminster Hall
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Westminster Hall is an alternative Chamber for MPs to hold debates, named after the adjoining Westminster Hall.

Each debate is chaired by an MP from the Panel of Chairs, rather than the Speaker or Deputy Speaker. A Government Minister will give the final speech, and no votes may be called on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Jo Platt Portrait Jo Platt (Leigh and Atherton) (Lab/Co-op)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I beg to move,

That this House has considered social enterprises and community ownership.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Sir John.

When people make speeches about post-industrial towns like mine, they often begin in the same way: by listing everything that we have lost. They talk about decline, deprivation, and the industries that disappeared during the wave of UK deindustrialisation. To be clear, many of those things are true and it is important to acknowledge that. However, that story often misses something just as important, because although the mills closed and the factories fell silent, the people of towns like Leigh and Atherton did what they have always done: they got on with it. They supported each other, they built new initiatives and they kept their communities going. What I see in my constituency is not a place defined only by what has been lost, but resilience, creativity, and an extraordinary sense of community, built from the ground up.

The truth is that towns like mine have never lacked ideas, talent or determination, but we have often lacked the structures that allow communities to own and shape their local economies. That is exactly why social enterprise and community ownership matter: they give communities tools to shape the economies and the future that they have always been building themselves.

At its heart, this debate is about ownership, because ownership determines who benefits from economic activity. When businesses are owned elsewhere, profits leave, but when businesses are owned locally, wealth stays, and it circulates through the local economy, supporting jobs, suppliers and services in the places where that wealth is created. A community-owned business or co-operative is owned and controlled by local people, who collectively make decisions and share the benefits. Those businesses exist to serve the needs of the community, rather than outside investors. Social enterprises operate in a simple way. As defined by Social Enterprise UK, they are businesses that trade

“for a social or environmental purpose”

and reinvest the majority of their profits into that mission. Both models give communities real power to shape their local economies and their future.

The tradition is deeply rooted in the north. The modern co-operative movement began with the Rochdale Society of Equitable Pioneers—a group of working people who showed that communities could come together to build businesses that served everyone.

Paul Waugh Portrait Paul Waugh (Rochdale) (Lab/Co-op)
- Hansard - -

I thank my hon. Friend for securing this debate and for mentioning Rochdale’s crucial role as the birthplace of the co-operative movement—a global social justice movement. Rochdale council is currently acquiring a church with the intention of turning it into a community-owned cultural venue, and our Pride in Place project in Hurstead, Belfield and Smallbridge similarly has the potential to become a community-owned co-operative, but at the moment the legislation works against both: co-operatives cannot claim gift aid, they do not get proper business rate relief, and there are many, many other ways in which it works against them. Does my hon. Friend agree that the Government should be removing those obstacles from co-ops so that they can thrive?

Jo Platt Portrait Jo Platt
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is a great advocate for the co-operative movement, whose birthplace is in his constituency. I absolutely agree with him—there is more the Government can do to support co-operatives in all sectors.

Today, the co-operative spirit is alive and well in my constituency. In towns like mine, such organisations are not simply community projects, but are becoming local economic anchors. Let me give the House a few examples. For Tyldesley is a community-led initiative that is revitalising the town through heritage restoration and community activities. In the same town, the Pelican Centre was one of the first swimming pools in the country to become community owned, and it is still thriving 14 years later. The Snug in Atherton, led by grassroots champion Rachael McEntee and supported by the Music Venue Trust, is helping to build a vibrant local cultural scene. Leigh Works is creating space for small businesses and digital innovation to flourish, while inspiring the next generation of local talent.

In a speech about community ownership, I could not afford to leave out Leigh Spinners Mill. I declare an interest: I used to manage that facility. It was once a disused red-brick giant of our industrial past, and it is now a thriving centre of creativity and enterprise, providing space for community organisations and local businesses. These are not isolated stories; they are part of a growing national movement.