Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office
Matt Vickers Portrait Matt Vickers
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is right. We look at the numbers—100 and 200—and think of organisations we know, and events that we have attended in churches and parish halls. I used to be a Scout leader, and the paperwork, the burden and the challenges used to put us off, in many ways, from fulfilling some of our functions. People who might have come along to help one day get slightly put off by the challenges and responsibilities that come with doing so. I could not agree more with my hon. Friend.

Paul Waugh Portrait Paul Waugh (Rochdale) (Lab/Co-op)
- Hansard - -

Does the shadow Minister not welcome the fact that the Bill increases the capacity from 100 to 200? His Government previously set the limit at 100—the figure that he is so concerned about.

Matt Vickers Portrait Matt Vickers
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I welcome the revisions; that is why we had scrutiny. The fact that the figures can be determined unilaterally is the concern. There is agreement across the House that it is right to take the Bill forward. We are looking at what we can do at the edges to mitigate the impact for smaller venues, but I agree in principle with what the hon. Member says.