Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Oral Answers to Questions

Paul Sweeney Excerpts
Wednesday 27th June 2018

(6 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think a fair interpretation is that it was a rhetorical question, which is not entirely without precedent in the history of the House of Commons.

Paul Sweeney Portrait Mr Paul Sweeney (Glasgow North East) (Lab/Co-op)
- Hansard - -

9. What representations he has received on the legality of the voter ID pilots.

Laura Smith Portrait Laura Smith (Crewe and Nantwich) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

12. What representations he has received on the legality of the voter ID pilots.

--- Later in debate ---
Chloe Smith Portrait The Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office (Chloe Smith)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Department has not received any representations about the legality of the pilots. The powers to make the pilot scheme orders are in section 10 of the Representation of the People Act 2000, which was, of course, passed by Parliament. Those powers enable changes to be made to rules regarding the conduct of any local elections in England and Wales.

Paul Sweeney Portrait Mr Sweeney
- Hansard - -

At the last general election, my constituency had the lowest turnout in the UK, and it also has a low registration rate. What kind of democracy are we living in when the Government actively pursue a scheme that results in people being denied the vote, as was shown by the pilot in May, instead of seeking better engagement and participation in our democracy by potential voters?

Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman will have just heard me setting out measures to encourage more people to be involved in our democracy. He knows, as I hope does every Opposition Member, that there is a point of principle at stake here. Do we defend our system from fraud or do we not?