Information between 24th March 2025 - 3rd May 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 366 Noes - 41 |
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 303 |
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 72 Noes - 304 |
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 307 |
26 Mar 2025 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 137 Noes - 304 |
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 305 |
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 62 |
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 306 |
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 170 |
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 302 |
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 167 |
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 167 |
31 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 104 |
31 Mar 2025 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 164 |
24 Mar 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 322 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 74 |
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 311 Noes - 192 |
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 307 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 190 |
25 Mar 2025 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 198 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 179 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 180 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 166 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 310 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 180 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 322 Noes - 117 |
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 308 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 313 Noes - 194 |
25 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill (changed to Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers) Bill) - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 183 |
25 Mar 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 308 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 196 |
1 Apr 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 110 Noes - 302 |
1 Apr 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 303 Noes - 110 |
2 Apr 2025 - Onshore Wind and Solar Generation - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 299 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 100 |
2 Apr 2025 - Driving Licences: Zero Emission Vehicles - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 101 |
2 Apr 2025 - Energy Conservation - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 349 Noes - 14 |
23 Apr 2025 - Sewage - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 69 |
23 Apr 2025 - Hospitals - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 307 |
23 Apr 2025 - Sewage - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 302 |
28 Apr 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 273 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 337 |
28 Apr 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 271 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 342 Noes - 70 |
29 Apr 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 232 Labour No votes vs 11 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 238 |
29 Apr 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 248 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 257 |
29 Apr 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 248 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 101 Noes - 258 |
29 Apr 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 248 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 73 Noes - 255 |
30 Apr 2025 - Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-sentence Reports) Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 210 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 3 |
30 Apr 2025 - Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-sentence Reports) Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 211 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 226 |
30 Apr 2025 - Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-sentence Reports) Bill - View Vote Context Paul Foster voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 208 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 222 |
Speeches |
---|
Paul Foster speeches from: School-based Nursery Capital Grants
Paul Foster contributed 1 speech (103 words) Wednesday 2nd April 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for International Development |
Paul Foster speeches from: Asylum Hotels and Illegal Channel Crossings
Paul Foster contributed 1 speech (75 words) Tuesday 25th March 2025 - Commons Chamber Home Office |
Written Answers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chorley Station: Access
Asked by: Paul Foster (Labour - South Ribble) Tuesday 1st April 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what information her Department holds on when accessibility improvement works will commence at Chorley railway station. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) Northern Trains Ltd and Network Rail took the decision to remove the previous contractor due to serious on-site safety concerns and remedial works have taken place. Urgent work is underway to consider how best to deliver accessibility improvements at Chorley station – MPs and other stakeholders will be updated once a viable strategy has been identified. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Personal Independence Payment: South Ribble
Asked by: Paul Foster (Labour - South Ribble) Friday 9th May 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people in South Ribble constituency are in receipt of Personal Independence Payment (PIP); how those payments are broken down between the (a) daily living and (b) mobility component; and how many of those people did not score a four or above on the assessment criteria. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) As of January 2025, there are 5,340 people currently in receipt of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) in the South Ribble Parliamentary Constituency. Of these claimants, 2,530 scored fewer than 4 points in the 10 Daily Living activities. The breakdown of award rates for Daily Living and Mobility can be found in Table 1 below.
The assessment of the Office for Budget Responsibility, published at the Spring Statement, is that most of the current claimants of PIP Daily Living who did not score four points in any of the activities at their last assessment will, nevertheless, because of behaviour changes, be awarded PIP Daily Living again after the proposed eligibility changes take effect.
There will be no immediate changes. We want to reassure anyone concerned that the changes to PIP eligibility and rebalancing of UC aren’t coming into effect immediately. Our intention is these changes will start to come into effect from April 2026 for UC and November 2026 for PIP, subject to parliamentary approval.
We will also guarantee that for those on UC, individuals with the most severe, life-long conditions, which mean a person cannot and will never work, will not need to be reassessed in future.
Our intention is that the PIP changes will apply to new claims and award reviews from November 2026, subject to parliamentary approval. If you are getting PIP now and could be affected by the changes we plan to make to eligibility, the changes will only apply at your next award review. The average award review is about three years. At your next review, you will be seen by a trained assessor or healthcare professional, and assessed on your individual needs and circumstance.
For those who are affected by the new eligibility changes, we are consulting on how best to support this group, including how to make sure health and eligible care needs are met. PIP is not based on your condition, it is based on the functional disability as the result of one or more conditions and it is the additional costs of sum of that disability that PIP is awarded for.
We also intend to launch a wider review of the PIP assessment led by the Minister for Social Security and Disability, and we will bring together a range of experts, stakeholders and people with lived experience to consider how best to do this and to start the process as part of preparing for a review. We will provide further details as plans progress.
Table 1: the volume of claimants in the South Ribble constituency split by award rate for Daily Living and Mobility components of PIP
Note:
|
Early Day Motions Signed |
---|
Tuesday 13th May Paul Foster signed this EDM as a sponsor on Thursday 15th May 2025 Service with the British Commanders’-In-Chief Mission to the Soviet Forces in Germany, 1946-1990 6 signatures (Most recent: 16 May 2025)Tabled by: Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative - Huntingdon) That this House recognises the courage, service and commitment of the service personnel who served in the British Commanders’-in-Chief Mission to the Soviet Forces in Germany (BRIXMIS) in East Germany during the Cold War; further recognises the high risk involved in the conduct of the intelligence collection patrols campaign against … |
Thursday 27th February Paul Foster signed this EDM on Thursday 27th March 2025 Israel’s military presence in the West Bank 58 signatures (Most recent: 8 Apr 2025)Tabled by: Richard Burgon (Labour - Leeds East) That this House expresses alarm over the escalating Israeli military assaults across the illegally occupied West Bank, including the use of armoured tanks in Jenin for the first time since 2002; notes that since 21 January 2025, Israel has launched a major offensive resulting in the deaths of at least … |