Information between 18th January 2025 - 7th February 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
21 Jan 2025 - Environmental Protection - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 330 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 352 Noes - 75 |
21 Jan 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 331 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 349 |
21 Jan 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 327 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 191 Noes - 338 |
21 Jan 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 331 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 338 |
28 Jan 2025 - Water (Special Measures) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 325 |
28 Jan 2025 - Water (Special Measures) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 73 Noes - 321 |
28 Jan 2025 - Water (Special Measures) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 322 |
29 Jan 2025 - Draft Gambling Act 2005 (Operating Licence Conditions) (Amendment) Regulations 2024
Draft Gambling Levy Regulations 2025 - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 11 Noes - 4 |
3 Feb 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 343 Noes - 87 |
Speeches |
---|
Patrick Hurley speeches from: Southport Attack
Patrick Hurley contributed 1 speech (144 words) Wednesday 5th February 2025 - Commons Chamber Home Office |
Patrick Hurley speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Patrick Hurley contributed 2 speeches (85 words) Tuesday 4th February 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
Patrick Hurley speeches from: Southport Attack
Patrick Hurley contributed 1 speech (220 words) Tuesday 21st January 2025 - Commons Chamber Home Office |
Written Answers |
---|
Special Educational Needs: Extended Services
Asked by: Patrick Hurley (Labour - Southport) Tuesday 28th January 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if she will take legislative steps to make it a statutory requirement for Local Authorities to provide wraparound childcare provision for children with special educational needs and disabilities. Answered by Stephen Morgan - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education) This government is determined to break down barriers to opportunity for all children and young people, ensuring they have access to the brilliant education and care they need to achieve and thrive. This includes ensuring that wraparound care is available and accessible. The government is improving access to before and after school care through the National Wraparound Childcare Programme.
The programme is being delivered through local authorities, given their existing sufficiency duty. The Childcare Act 2006 places a legal duty on local authorities to make sure that there are enough childcare places within its locality for working parents or parents who are studying or training for employment, for children aged 0 to 14, or up to 18 for disabled children. All local authorities should be able to demonstrate how they have discharged this duty and should include specific reference to how they are ensuring there is sufficient childcare to meet the needs of children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND), as per the statutory guidance. This should be available from the local authority.
The department has also taken decisive action by announcing in the King’s Speech that, under the Children’s Wellbeing Bill, every state-funded school in England with primary aged pupils will offer a breakfast club. Departmental officials are working closely with schools and sector experts to develop a breakfast club programme that meets the needs of all children, including those with SEND.
On 23 September 2024, my right hon. Friend, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, announced that up to 750 state-funded schools with primary aged pupils will begin delivering free breakfast clubs from April 2025. The funding will allow these schools to run free breakfast clubs for their pupils starting in the summer term as part of a ‘test and learn’ phase to inform delivery of a national rollout, this will include testing approaches to supporting children with SEND.
This government’s ambition is that all children and young people with SEND or in alternative provision receive the right support to succeed in their education and as they move into adult life. The department is committed to improving inclusivity and expertise in mainstream schools, as well as ensuring special schools cater to those with the most complex needs, restoring parents’ trust that their child will get the support they need.
|
Sentencing: Attendance
Asked by: Patrick Hurley (Labour - Southport) Tuesday 28th January 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether she plans to give courts powers to order offenders' attendance at sentencing hearings. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) Offenders who refuse to attend their sentencing hearings deny victims and their families the opportunity to explain how their crimes have impacted their lives. This Government wants victims to have faith that justice will be delivered and to see criminals face the consequences of their actions. The Government is committed to legislating to enhance court powers to require offenders to attend their sentencing hearings. This measure will be included in the Victims, Courts and Public Protection Bill which is due to be introduced as soon as parliamentary time allows. |