Information between 3rd October 2024 - 2nd November 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
8 Oct 2024 - Farming and Food Security - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 351 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 359 |
8 Oct 2024 - VAT: Independent Schools - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 349 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 190 Noes - 363 |
9 Oct 2024 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 342 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 424 |
15 Oct 2024 - Division - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 363 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 453 |
16 Oct 2024 - Access to Primary Healthcare - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 326 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 80 Noes - 337 |
16 Oct 2024 - Carer’s Allowance - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 329 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 335 |
21 Oct 2024 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 353 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 386 |
21 Oct 2024 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 355 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 386 Noes - 105 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 343 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 361 Noes - 111 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 346 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 96 Noes - 353 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 345 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 361 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Patrick Hurley voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 343 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 124 Noes - 361 |
Speeches |
---|
Patrick Hurley speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Patrick Hurley contributed 2 speeches (61 words) Thursday 24th October 2024 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
Patrick Hurley speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Patrick Hurley contributed 2 speeches (57 words) Monday 7th October 2024 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
Written Answers |
---|
Broadband
Asked by: Patrick Hurley (Labour - Southport) Wednesday 30th October 2024 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps he is taking to (a) ensure (i) transparency and (ii) accountability in the decision-making process for broadband infrastructure projects and (b) tackle potential conflicts of interest. Answered by Chris Bryant - Minister of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) DSIT defines clear policies and procedures for identifying, disclosing, and managing conflicts of interest. This includes a comprehensive disclosure process set out in Terms and Conditions documents and encourages proactive disclosure by employees. Non-Executive Directors are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest upon appointment and as soon as they become aware of them. Civil Servants and appointed board members must also adhere to a code of conduct that outlines the principles and standards expected of them. This includes maintaining integrity and professionalism and ensuring that private interests do not adversely impact their official duties. As an arm Arms’ Length Body (ALB), BDUK may be subject to ALB review by the Cabinet Office, which involve independent parties to review the organisation in full and oversee conflict of interest situations to ensure impartiality and fairness. BDUK Non-Executive Directors support business performance and provide strategic guidance to the executive team, Non-Executive Directors are not involved in any commercial contract awarding decisions. To identify intervention areas for Project Gigabit interventions, the government conducts regular market reviews to collect data on suppliers’ commercial plans to define the premises that are eligible for Project Gigabit subsidy. Using this information, the government then conducts a transparent, fair, and robust procurement process to award contracts to any Project Gigabit suppliers. |