Representation of the People (Young People’s Enfranchisement) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Representation of the People (Young People’s Enfranchisement) Bill

Patrick Grady Excerpts
2nd reading: House of Commons
Friday 11th May 2018

(6 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Representation of the People (Young People's Enfranchisement) Bill 2017-19 Read Hansard Text
Luke Graham Portrait Luke Graham
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I could not agree more. Colleagues across the House need to remember that today’s 16-year-olds will be reaching 20 come the next election, and they will probably have a bearing on our own electoral successes.

Patrick Grady Portrait Patrick Grady (Glasgow North) (SNP)
- Hansard - -

Another lesson that can be learned from Scotland is how the Scottish Parliament takes forward private Members’ Bills. This is the second Bill on votes at 16 this Session that is in danger of being talked out. The reality is that if such a proposal had the same amount of support in the Scottish Parliament as it clearly does here, it would go through because Holyrood’s system allows it. We need democratic reform, votes at 16 and to reform this corrupt, unfair private Member’s Bill system.

Luke Graham Portrait Luke Graham
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman makes a point about the Scottish Parliament, but at the risk of getting slightly party political, I would draw his attention to the fact only one such piece of legislation was put before the Scottish Parliament in 2016-17, so its legislative example is not exactly leading the way. I will not take lectures on that from him in this place.

Patrick Grady Portrait Patrick Grady
- Hansard - -

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. I believe that the word “cruel” has been used in the past because the system can be so unfair on Members, but I withdraw the word “corrupt”.

Baroness Laing of Elderslie Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Mrs Eleanor Laing)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am glad that the hon. Gentleman has made his point of order. I did not like the use of the word “corrupt”, but I appreciate that he was not calling any Member corrupt, so I did not call him to order. He has recognised that moderation is best, and I thank him for his point of order.