All 1 Owen Thompson contributions to the National Security Act 2023

Read Bill Ministerial Extracts

Wed 3rd May 2023
National Security Bill
Commons Chamber

Consideration of Lords amendments

National Security Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office

National Security Bill

Owen Thompson Excerpts
Consideration of Lords amendments
Wednesday 3rd May 2023

(1 year, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate National Security Act 2023 Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Commons Consideration of Lords Amendments as at 3 May 2023 - (3 May 2023)
Julian Lewis Portrait Sir Julian Lewis
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am grateful for that strong support. It should not have been necessary for people in the upper House to bring forward a legal requirement to update the MOU. For the benefit of people not buried in the intricacies of these arrangements, let me say that the MOU means that at any one time an exchange of letters between me, as the Chairman of the ISC, and the Prime Minister can modify the range of organisations that the ISC has the right to scrutinise. As we will be hearing in a few moments, that is because when that arrangement was initiated, it was recognised that from time to time changes in the structure of Departments mean that different parts involving classified intelligence-related activities would pop up here and there in different Ministries, so we would need an ability to adjust the MOU to approve our scrutinising the classified parts of those activities. That is precisely because ordinary—I know that my colleague on the Front Bench does not like my using that word—departmental Select Committees are not able effectively to scrutinise highly classified material in any systematic way. If they were, it would not have been necessary to set up the ISC in the first place.

Owen Thompson Portrait Owen Thompson (Midlothian) (SNP)
- Hansard - -

As a relatively new member of the ISC, I am finding it extremely perplexing to try to understand why the Government have such a resistance to updating the MOU. Does our Chair agree that it would be particularly useful if the Minister gave his commitment to backing the Committee’s calls to update the MOU, using his good offices, and to trying to move that forward as quickly as possible? Like others, I can find little understanding of why the Government would be so resistant to doing that.

Julian Lewis Portrait Sir Julian Lewis
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am very grateful for the hon. Gentleman’s support and I take this opportunity to pay tribute to both him and his predecessor for making an extremely valuable and valued contribution to the Committee. We draw such authority as we have from the fact that party politics does not enter into our work. I think I heard the Security Minister say that he accepted that the MOU needs to be updated—