Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland: Supreme Court Judgment Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Northern Ireland Office

Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland: Supreme Court Judgment

Lord Dodds of Duncairn Excerpts
Thursday 9th February 2023

(1 year, 3 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Caine Portrait Lord Caine (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I agree with my noble friend and thank him for his kind words. We are seeking to achieve, as I indicated in my opening Answer, a situation that respects the integrity of the EU single market and the UK’s internal market, and Northern Ireland’s constitutional position as an integral part of our United Kingdom—a position, I hasten to add, that I wish never to see change.

Lord Dodds of Duncairn Portrait Lord Dodds of Duncairn (DUP)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, the Minister referred to having won in the court, but the Government have won on the basis of the argument that the Acts of Union have been suspended. Are the Government proud of arguing in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom that the Acts of Union have been suspended? What action will the Minister take to restore the union?

Lord Caine Portrait Lord Caine (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will resist the attempt to turn the House of Lords into another branch of the Supreme Court and relitigate the case on which judgment was reached yesterday. All I will say to my noble friend is that we are well aware of the defects in the protocol, which have become apparent. Some might say that they were apparent at the time, but they are very apparent today. We are determined to remedy what does not work, while preserving what does.