Debates between Nick Thomas-Symonds and Rachael Maskell during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Off-patent Drugs Bill

Debate between Nick Thomas-Symonds and Rachael Maskell
Friday 6th November 2015

(9 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Nick Thomas-Symonds Portrait Nick Thomas-Symonds
- Hansard - -

I agree entirely with my hon. Friend. It is precisely that kind of benefit that the Bill would bring.

Rachael Maskell Portrait Rachael Maskell (York Central) (Lab/Co-op)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Today, a constituent of mine, Mark Hamilton, is laying to rest the ashes of his father, who lost his life very suddenly in September. Had these drugs been available then, he might well be with us today. Is that not why it is so important that the Bill proceeds to its next stage?

Nick Thomas-Symonds Portrait Nick Thomas-Symonds
- Hansard - -

I am grateful for that intervention, because the Bill could have a positive impact on the lives of many people. That is why it should move forward.

This is a common-sense solution to an acknowledged problem. There is even a precedent for it. The Secretary of State, who is not in his place, but whom I am sure will be ably represented by the Minister, is the licence holder for a chemotherapy drug called Erwinase. It is manufactured by a state-owned pharmaceutical company called Porton Biopharma Ltd, which was established in July and in which the Secretary of State is the sole shareholder. There is, therefore, a precedent for the type of intervention I am talking about to deal with this market failure. The Bill will bring enormous benefits to people. It is a sensible solution to the problem.