To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Commons)
23 Mar 2015 - Amendment of the Law - View Vote Context
Nick Raynsford (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 228 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 337 Noes - 240
Division Vote (Commons)
23 Mar 2015 - Amendment of the Law - View Vote Context
Nick Raynsford (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 229 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 334 Noes - 250
Division Vote (Commons)
23 Mar 2015 - Amendment of the Law - View Vote Context
Nick Raynsford (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 228 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 340 Noes - 244
Written Question
Housing: Construction
Thursday 19th March 2015

Asked by: Nick Raynsford (Labour - Greenwich and Woolwich)

Question to the Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities:

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, pursuant to his Answer of 12 March 2015 to Question 226673, whether starter homes provided under his proposed exceptions policy could be counted towards off-site affordable housing obligations owed by developers under section 106 agreements made in respect of other development sites.

Answered by Brandon Lewis

I refer the rt. hon Member to my answer to him of 12 March 2015, Question 226673, and the associated guidance which outlines the exceptions policy in place.


Written Question
Housing: Construction
Thursday 19th March 2015

Asked by: Nick Raynsford (Labour - Greenwich and Woolwich)

Question to the Department for Levelling Up, Housing & Communities:

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what estimate his Department made of the number of starter homes that could be provided on sites in commercial or industrial use that (a) were otherwise unlikely to be brought forward for residential purposes and (b) are not currently identified for residential development but which might be brought forward as a windfall element in a local authority's five year land supply when assessing the availability of land for starter homes under the proposed exceptions policy.

Answered by Brandon Lewis

I refer the rt. hon Member to my answers of 12 and 16 March to his Questions 226642, 226652 and 226673.


MP Expense Claim
Nick Raynsford (Labour - Greenwich and Woolwich)
Date
Wed 18th Mar 2015
418078
Type
Miscellaneous Expenses
(Contingency)
Description
Premier Moves removal from HoC to Woolwich temporary office
removal from HoC to Woolwich
Amount
£342.00
Paid

Division Vote (Commons)
17 Mar 2015 - Modern Slavery Bill - View Vote Context
Nick Raynsford (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 187 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 209
MP Expense Claim
Nick Raynsford (Labour - Greenwich and Woolwich)
Date
Tue 17th Mar 2015
417841
Type
Office Costs
(Venue Hire Surgery/Meeting)
Description
Town Hall surgery 24/01/15
phone alarm and surgeries
Amount
£79.18
Paid

Division Vote (Commons)
16 Mar 2015 - Transport for London Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Nick Raynsford (Lab) voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 12 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 190 Noes - 14
Speech in Commons Chamber - Mon 16 Mar 2015
Oral Answers to Questions

Speech Link

View all Nick Raynsford (Lab - Greenwich and Woolwich) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions