Growth and Infrastructure Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Growth and Infrastructure Bill

Nick de Bois Excerpts
Monday 5th November 2012

(12 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
David Mowat Portrait David Mowat
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Nick de Bois Portrait Nick de Bois (Enfield North) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Ian Murray Portrait Ian Murray
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I will give way to the hon. Member for Warrington South (David Mowat), who was a member of the Committee considering the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill.

Ian Murray Portrait Ian Murray
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think that there is a slight difference between people who take on a partnership in an accountancy firm and people who embark on training.

Fifthly, what will happen to PAYE and national insurance contributions? At present, any shares “in kind” would be subject to the usual Inland Revenue rules.

Nick de Bois Portrait Nick de Bois
- Hansard - -

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Ian Murray Portrait Ian Murray
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am afraid that I do not have time. [Interruption.] It is the Government who schedule these debates, not me. The hon. Gentleman should have a chat with the Government Whips Office.

Could such shares also be used for tax avoidance purposes when executives receive the maximum allocation and take full advantage of the corporation tax regime?

Sixthly, will the contracts be voluntary? Could an employer make it a condition of employment that they are signed? Could an entire work force be moved on to them? Could a post be advertised as an “employee only” vacancy?

The list is endless. This is a ragtag of a Bill and a ragtag of a proposal. The Chancellor proclaimed in his conference speech that the proposal represented

“owners, workers and the taxman”

—where have we heard this phrase before?—

“all in it together”.

In reality, the measure is divisive, it risks creating a two-tier labour market, and it flies in the face of the “one nation” approach that Opposition Members wish to see. Making it easier to fire people will not help economic recovery.

There is nothing in the Bill to address the root causes of the Government’s economic failure or housing crisis. Instead the Bill could damage in a number of ways the planning system, housing delivery, communities and relationships in the workplace. It is also clear that, although the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills is resisting the Beecroft fire-at-will agenda, it is alive and being delivered by his Department minders, who were brought in at the reshuffle to sort the Secretary of State out.

Like the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill, this Bill is an ill thought through, incoherent, “make it up as you go along” mess of measures cobbled together by an increasingly desperate, out of touch Prime Minister and Chancellor. I look forward to Members joining us in the Lobby later.