To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Crown Prosecution Service: Standards
Friday 12th September 2025

Asked by: Neil Shastri-Hurst (Conservative - Solihull West and Shirley)

Question to the Attorney General:

To ask the Solicitor General, what the average time taken is from referral to charging decision by the Crown Prosecution Service.

Answered by Ellie Reeves - Solicitor General (Attorney General's Office)

Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) management information shows that in the most recent 12 months ending March 2025 it took a mean average of 46 calendar days from the first time the CPS received a case, either a request for early advice or a referral for a charging decision, to the decision to charge and prosecute.

For the above metric the median average is two calendar days.

The above timeliness data includes cases where the police have submitted a file for early advice as well as those for charging decision. This data includes cases where the police were required to submit further evidence prior to a decision to charge. This generally includes more than one submission and further investigation.

The timeliness of a charging decision is determined by three key factors: whether the case has been sent to the CPS for early advice during the investigative process; how quickly the police can complete the necessary enquiries; and how quickly the CPS can then review the evidence provided by the police and finalise the charging decision.


Written Question
Financial Services: Education
Friday 12th September 2025

Asked by: Neil Shastri-Hurst (Conservative - Solihull West and Shirley)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that (a) apprentices and (b) young entrepreneurs have access to financial education.

Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

Financial education is integrated into the curriculum at key stages 3 and 4 (ages 11-16) through citizenship education and elements of the mathematics curriculum. Together this covers such areas as personal budgeting, saving for the future, managing credit and debt and calculating interest.

Financial education is not compulsory post-16, however, providers are free to teach it and our 16-19 study programme guidance sets an expectation that students take part in other non-qualification activity to develop life skills, including managing personal finances.

There are a range of financial education-related qualifications for 16 to 19-year-olds to study, in including qualifications and courses at levels 1 and 2, with both the mathematics GCSE and L2 Functional Skills Qualifications supporting financial education. At Level 3 there is the T Level in Finance and Core Maths, which also covers financial literacy.

The current curriculum and assessment review will consider coverage of areas including applied knowledge and skills young people will need in life and work such as financial education.

Upskilling in English and mathematics is a key feature of all apprenticeships and young apprentices aged 16-18 at the start of their apprenticeship are required to achieve English and mathematics qualifications.


Written Question
Prosecutions
Thursday 11th September 2025

Asked by: Neil Shastri-Hurst (Conservative - Solihull West and Shirley)

Question to the Attorney General:

To ask the Solicitor General, how many prosecutions the Crown Prosecution Service has discontinued in the last three years; and for what reasons.

Answered by Ellie Reeves - Solicitor General (Attorney General's Office)

Management information held by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) shows the number of defendants whose prosecution was dropped by the CPS and the primary reason allocated to the outcome at finalisation.

The table below shows the number and proportion of prosecutions dropped and the reason applied for the latest available three years ending March 2025.

2022-2023

2023-2024

2024-2025

Total Prosecutions

402,052

419,401

449,573

Prosecutions Dropped

45,674

46,794

49,553

Prosecutions Dropped % of Total Prosecutions

11.4%

11.2%

11.0%

Victim or witness reasons

13,334

13,023

14,160

Victim or witness reasons % of Total Prosecutions

3.3%

3.1%

3.1%

Victim reasons

10,426

10,479

11,351

Victim reasons % of Total Prosecutions

2.6%

2.5%

2.5%

Witness reasons

2,908

2,544

2,809

Witness reasons % of Total Prosecutions

0.7%

0.6%

0.6%

Disclosure - undermining unused material

1,637

2,185

2,067

Disclosure - undermining unused material % of Total Prosecutions

0.4%

0.5%

0.5%

Evidential

18,572

19,251

19,622

Evidential % of Total Prosecutions

4.6%

4.6%

4.4%

Public interest

11,510

11,720

12,886

Public interest % of Total Prosecutions

2.9%

2.8%

2.9%

Other

621

615

818

Other % of Total Prosecutions

0.2%

0.1%

0.2%

Data Source: CPS Case Management Information System


Written Question
Crown Prosecution Service: Recruitment
Thursday 11th September 2025

Asked by: Neil Shastri-Hurst (Conservative - Solihull West and Shirley)

Question to the Attorney General:

To ask the Solicitor General, how many additional prosecutors the Crown Prosecution Service has recruited in each of the last three years.

Answered by Ellie Reeves - Solicitor General (Attorney General's Office)

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has recruited the following additional prosecutors in each of the last three years:

CPS Prosecutor Full Time Equivalent (FTE) at year end

FTE Change on previous year / additional prosecutors recruited

FY 22/23

3022.5

+ 82.4

FY 23/24

3075.1

+ 52.6

FY 24/25

3052.7

- 22.4

Total FTE Growth / additional Prosecutors

+112.6

The CPS forecasts significant growth in the number of additional prosecutors for the financial year 2025/26 following its positive Spending Review Phase 2 settlement – in which CPS received an uplift of £96 million.


Written Question
Crown Prosecution Service
Thursday 11th September 2025

Asked by: Neil Shastri-Hurst (Conservative - Solihull West and Shirley)

Question to the Attorney General:

To ask the Solicitor General, what recent assessment she has made of the adequacy of resources available to the Crown Prosecution Service to meet current case volumes.

Answered by Ellie Reeves - Solicitor General (Attorney General's Office)

In June, the Chancellor announced a landmark increase of £96m (RDELex) in additional funding for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) over the spending review period.

Through the spending review process, the AGO worked with the CPS and HM Treasury to review and agree CPS resources through assessing current and anticipated future case volumes, including consideration of the number of sitting days and the growing complexity of cases. This included a zero-based review of the CPS’ budget for this financial year, which tested the value for money of their spending and ensured that they are driving efficiencies and delivering for the public.

The additional funding over the next three years will mean the CPS can recruit more Crown Advocates and frontline staff to prosecute cases and better support victims. Investment in digital technology, new digital casework tools, and exploration of artificial intelligence tools will enable a more productive CPS to respond to the growing volume of cases.


Written Question
Shipbuilding
Tuesday 9th September 2025

Asked by: Neil Shastri-Hurst (Conservative - Solihull West and Shirley)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps he plans to take to increase shipbuilding capacity.

Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence)

This Government has an ambitious shipbuilding pipeline with major naval programmes in progress at a number of UK shipyards, recent export success of the Type 26 frigate to Norway and forthcoming civil shipbuilding programmes.

The National Shipbuilding Office (NSO) is leading the work for Government to engage with industry to explore further opportunities and requirements. As part of their remit, the NSO assesses current and future capacity to consider both demand and supply.


Written Question
Family Proceedings
Monday 8th September 2025

Asked by: Neil Shastri-Hurst (Conservative - Solihull West and Shirley)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many open family cases there were in each Designated Family Judge area as of 23 July 2025, broken down by (a) public law and (b) private law; and what proportion of those cases involved litigants in person.

Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice)

The information requested is provided in the data tables below up until 31 March 2025, aligning with the time period published in the Ministry of Justice’s official statistics. All data is taken from HMCTS administrative systems.

Caseload data by Designated Family Judge area:

Count of the Public Law Open Caseload as at the 31 March 2025 broken down to reflect whether parties to proceedings have legal representation

Designated Family Judge Area

Both Applicant and Respondent

Applicant only

Respondent only

Neither Applicant nor Respondent

Total

Birmingham

190

11

0

1

202

Blackburn/Lancaster

304

21

0

0

325

Bournemouth and Dorset

76

2

0

0

78

Brighton

205

10

0

0

215

Bristol (A, NS and G)

232

6

0

1

239

Business Centres

0

0

0

0

0

Carlisle

98

8

0

1

107

Central London

529

20

1

2

552

Cleveland and South Durham

259

24

0

3

286

Coventry

100

7

0

0

107

Derby

158

4

0

0

162

Devon

246

20

0

1

267

East London

535

18

0

1

554

Essex and Suffolk

319

13

0

1

332

Humberside

220

12

0

0

232

Leicester

124

3

0

0

127

Lincoln

96

5

0

0

101

Liverpool

493

52

1

6

552

Luton

119

7

0

0

126

Manchester

721

37

0

3

761

Medway and Canterbury

342

5

0

2

349

Milton Keynes

140

4

0

0

144

North Wales

99

9

0

0

108

North Yorkshire

94

5

0

2

101

Northampton

98

3

0

0

101

Northumbria and North Durham

397

26

0

8

431

Norwich

100

3

0

0

103

Nottingham

131

7

0

0

138

Peterborough and Cambridge

139

3

0

0

142

Portsmouth (Hampshire and IOW)

194

21

0

2

217

Reading

239

7

1

1

248

Royal Courts of Justice

44

0

0

0

44

South East Wales

216

25

0

3

244

South Yorkshire

273

13

0

0

286

Stoke on Trent

162

19

0

2

183

Surrey

89

4

0

1

94

Swansea

100

13

0

0

113

Swindon

63

1

0

1

65

Taunton

99

5

0

0

104

Truro

66

4

0

0

70

Watford

85

4

0

2

91

West London

385

14

0

1

400

West Yorkshire

342

29

0

3

374

Wolverhampton

283

16

0

0

299

Worcester

76

6

0

3

85

England and Wales

9,280

526

3

51

9,860

Count of the Private Law Open Caseload as at the 31 March 2025 broken down to reflect whether parties to proceedings have legal representation

Designated Family Judge Area

Both Applicant and Respondent

Applicant only

Respondent only

Neither Applicant nor Respondent

Total

Birmingham

106

139

113

232

590

Blackburn/Lancaster

148

208

132

388

876

Bournemouth and Dorset

42

52

49

114

257

Brighton

128

244

179

734

1285

Bristol (A, NS and G)

223

205

158

458

1044

Business Centres

0

1

0

7

8

Carlisle

46

58

39

106

249

Central London

328

446

338

985

2097

Cleveland and South Durham

113

92

90

154

449

Coventry

81

90

82

164

417

Derby

107

88

98

194

487

Devon

171

185

170

310

836

East London

346

484

416

881

2127

Essex and Suffolk

305

394

320

894

1913

Humberside

72

115

89

232

508

Leicester

111

134

114

273

632

Lincoln

69

69

51

112

301

Liverpool

271

300

276

608

1455

Luton

83

123

114

318

638

Manchester

407

548

421

1094

2470

Medway and Canterbury

197

292

260

788

1537

Milton Keynes

48

72

73

169

362

North Wales

58

46

42

55

201

North Yorkshire

79

79

64

106

328

Northampton

42

53

58

206

359

Northumbria and North Durham

229

209

159

293

890

Norwich

90

104

99

225

518

Nottingham

135

189

140

269

733

Peterborough and Cambridge

119

145

100

357

721

Portsmouth (Hampshire and IOW)

177

269

208

781

1435

Reading

169

262

206

473

1110

Royal Courts of Justice

90

428

32

281

831

South East Wales

83

104

71

179

437

South Yorkshire

115

140

112

203

570

Stoke on Trent

89

101

81

204

475

Surrey

144

160

125

395

824

Swansea

139

126

65

94

424

Swindon

41

60

44

196

341

Taunton

73

64

67

144

348

Truro

85

66

58

170

379

Watford

117

162

151

386

816

West London

415

494

405

953

2267

West Yorkshire

225

280

173

409

1087

Wolverhampton

226

243

167

405

1041

Worcester

78

79

70

130

357

England and Wales

6,420

8,202

6,279

16,129

37,030

Notes:

  1. The HMCTS data provided above is in line with latest MoJ statistics.

  1. Self-representation is determined by the field 'legal representation' in Familyman being left blank. Therefore, this is only a proxy measure and parties without a recorded representative are not necessarily self-representing litigants in person.

  1. A party is considered 'applicant-represented' if at least one applicant has a recorded representative, and likewise for respondents.

  1. The majority of Public law applicants are public bodies with access to their own legal resources - however, this legal representation is often not recorded. To address this we introduced a methodology which assumes that all public body applicants have legal representation.


Written Question
Financial Services: Education
Monday 8th September 2025

Asked by: Neil Shastri-Hurst (Conservative - Solihull West and Shirley)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of the adequacy of the curriculum in preparing young people for dealing with (a) debt, (b) savings, (c) the cost of living and (d) other financial issues.

Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education)

I refer the hon. Member for Solihull West and Shirley to the answer of 9 April 2025 to Question 43513.


Written Question
Financial Services: Primary Education
Monday 8th September 2025

Asked by: Neil Shastri-Hurst (Conservative - Solihull West and Shirley)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether her Department plans to expand financial education provision to primary schools.

Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education)

I refer the hon. Member for Solihull West and Shirley to the answer of 9 April 2025 to Question 43513.


Written Question
Police: Health
Monday 8th September 2025

Asked by: Neil Shastri-Hurst (Conservative - Solihull West and Shirley)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential impact of reducing the physical fitness standards required of serving police officers on (a) public safety and (b) operational effectiveness.

Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office)

Chief Constables are able to locally determine the standards and assessment at recruitment for physical fitness of police officers. At the same time, chief officers have a statutory duty of care to their officers, and the public, and they must, therefore, satisfy themselves that officers can be deployed safely in a role and fulfil the duties of a police officer.

The College of Policing holds guidance to support forces on the implementation of fitness testing and standards for officers. Work is underway, led by the National Police Chiefs’ Council and College, to commence a review of the current demands of operational policing to inform future decisions on fitness standards at recruitment.