Security Vetting Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Security Vetting

Neil Duncan-Jordan Excerpts
Monday 20th April 2026

(1 day, 8 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Keir Starmer Portrait The Prime Minister
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

No, that is not the case. The judgment call to appoint him was my judgment call. That was an error and I have apologised for it, particularly to the victims of Epstein. The developed vetting process was carried out in the way I have indicated to the House. I should have been told at the time of the recommendation. Had I been told, I would not have made the appointment.

Neil Duncan-Jordan Portrait Neil Duncan-Jordan (Poole) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

Today’s statement may well be about process and procedure, but surely the real issue for the Prime Minister is why, when Peter Mandelson’s reputation was already known, he was ever considered for such an important role.

Keir Starmer Portrait The Prime Minister
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have accepted that that was my decision and I have apologised for it.