All 1 Natascha Engel contributions to the Awards for Valour (Protection) Bill 2016-17

Read Bill Ministerial Extracts

Fri 24th Feb 2017

Awards for Valour (Protection) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Awards for Valour (Protection) Bill

Natascha Engel Excerpts
Report stage: House of Commons
Friday 24th February 2017

(7 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Awards for Valour (Protection) Bill 2016-17 Read Hansard Text Amendment Paper: Consideration of Bill Amendments as at 24 February 2017 - (24 Feb 2017)
Philip Davies Portrait Philip Davies
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As it happens, I very much agree with the hon. Lady’s Bill, but it is seventh on the list, so she was a bit optimistic ever to have thought we would reach it. I cannot remember the last time we got to debate the seventh Bill on a Friday. She well knows that her Bill was never going to be reached for debate. I absolutely agree with her Bill, though, and she will get my wholehearted support if she persuades the Government to take up her proposal. Nevertheless, unfortunately the luck of the draw meant that we were never going to reach it today.

Natascha Engel Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Natascha Engel)
- Hansard - -

Order. We are starting to stray quite a lot now. We are now not only not talking about the amendment, but not talking about the Bill. I would be very grateful if the hon. Gentleman could restrict his comments to the amendments that he has tabled.

Philip Davies Portrait Philip Davies
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am trying to do that, Madam Deputy Speaker, but I keep getting distracted by Members wanting to raise all sorts of other matters. I will stick to my amendments, as I was trying to do in the first place.

Amendment 4 would remove the chance of anyone being sent to prison for such an act. Other countries have different positions, as was confirmed by the House of Commons Library before Second Reading. A range of offences is covered, and there is a distinction between wearing medals, wearing medals with an intent to deceive and wearing medals with a view to a financial gain. As my hon. Friend the Member for Christchurch (Mr Chope) said, fraud legislation already provides protection in this country when it comes to wearing an Army uniform, so we do have other legislation that covers this area, when other countries have no such legislation.

My amendments give a range of options: I have gone from no custodial sentence to custodial sentences of one day, seven days, 14 days, 21 days and 28 days, all of which are naturally better than three months. I prefer no custodial sentence at all, but I have tabled all those different amendments to give the House some kind of choice if it felt a different option was more appropriate.