Information between 2nd July 2025 - 11th August 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
2 Jul 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 327 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 338 Noes - 79 |
|
2 Jul 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 158 |
|
2 Jul 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 326 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 168 |
|
2 Jul 2025 - Competition - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 327 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 338 Noes - 79 |
|
2 Jul 2025 - Prisons - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 326 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 168 |
|
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 331 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 415 Noes - 98 |
|
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 346 |
|
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 340 |
|
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 338 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - against a party majority and against the House One of 47 Labour No votes vs 333 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 242 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 35 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 130 Noes - 443 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 377 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 416 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 356 Labour No votes vs 8 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 35 Noes - 469 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 377 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 401 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - against a party majority and against the House One of 37 Labour No votes vs 330 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 135 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 364 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 370 |
|
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 47 Labour Aye votes vs 331 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 149 Noes - 334 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Welfare Spending - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 344 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 440 |
|
15 Jul 2025 - Taxes - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 342 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Competition - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 54 |
|
16 Jul 2025 - Competition - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 334 Noes - 54 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Mohammad Yasin speeches from: Giving Every Child the Best Start in Life
Mohammad Yasin contributed 1 speech (77 words) Monday 7th July 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for International Development |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Cervical Cancer: Screening
Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford) Monday 28th July 2025 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his Department has considered providing self-sampling cervical screening kits to all women. Answered by Ashley Dalton - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Following the announcement to introduce human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling in the National Health Service cervical screening programme for the under-screened population, the NHS has begun planning an in-service evaluation (ISE) of HPV self-sampling in the wider population. The purpose of the ISE is to ensure that the self-sampling test is as accurate at detecting HPV as a clinician collected specimen, and to evaluate its impact on cervical screening uptake. The findings of the ISE will inform any future UK National Screening Committee recommendation to ministers to offer self-sampling across the whole population. |