Information between 24th June 2026 - 14th July 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
24 Jun 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 267 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 93 |
|
24 Jun 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 264 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 94 |
|
24 Jun 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 160 |
|
24 Jun 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 261 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 94 |
|
1 Jul 2026 - Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 277 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 282 |
|
1 Jul 2026 - Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 277 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 80 Noes - 281 |
|
1 Jul 2026 - Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 303 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 177 Noes - 308 |
|
1 Jul 2026 - Employment Tribunals - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 307 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 107 |
|
1 Jul 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 107 |
|
24 Jun 2026 - Customs - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 160 |
|
6 Jul 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 394 Noes - 85 |
|
8 Jul 2026 - Town and Country Planning - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 280 Labour Aye votes vs 21 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 283 Noes - 182 |
|
8 Jul 2026 - Health and Safety - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 317 Noes - 103 |
|
8 Jul 2026 - Education - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 307 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 369 Noes - 102 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Bus Services
Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford) Thursday 25th June 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of the consultation requirements for passengers under the Bus Services Act 2025; and whether she plans to introduce further measures to help ensure bus users are consulted before significant changes are made to local bus services. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The Bus Services Act 2025 places passengers at the heart of local bus services by strengthening requirements on local authorities and operators to consider the needs of the communities they serve.
The Act introduces safeguards that ensure passengers are properly considered before significant changes are made. This includes the socially necessary local services measure which means that local transport authorities (LTAs) and bus operators are now required to identify those services which are considered as being socially necessary for their community. Should such a service then face potential withdrawal or substantial alteration, the parties must work together to explore all available options before any significant changes are made. The Government is clear that passenger views are vital in implementing this measure, and LTAs should take care to ensure there is a balanced representation of passenger voices.
The Department's guidance to local transport authorities on establishing Enhanced Partnerships makes clear that stakeholders, including passenger groups, should be consulted on the contents of any such scheme. Guidance on setting up a franchising scheme requires local transport authorities to consult on the proposals, including with passenger groups. These measures ensure that passenger views are taken into account as part of considerations on delivering better local bus services.
|
|
Sheltered Housing: Older People
Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford) Thursday 25th June 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if he will take steps to ensure the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill contains provisions to ensure housing-with-care is affordable to as many retirees as possible. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to Question UIN 108467 on 3 February 2026. |
|
Bereavement Support Payment
Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford) Wednesday 1st July 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment the Department has made of the real-terms value of Bereavement Support Payment since its introduction in April 2017, including the change in value adjusted for CPI inflation in each financial year. Answered by Andrew Western - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The rate of Bereavement Support Payment (BSP) is reviewed annually on a discretionary basis as part of the uprating process. As BSP is not a cost‑of‑living benefit, it is not automatically linked to inflation. While factors such as Consumer Prices Index (CPI) may be considered in the annual review, there is no requirement to link to CPI and no fixed methodology for determining changes to its value. |
|
Bereavement Support Payment
Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford) Wednesday 1st July 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what methodology is used in the annual uprating assessment of Bereavement Support Payment; and whether CPI inflation is explicitly incorporated into decisions on maintaining its real-terms value. Answered by Andrew Western - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The rate of Bereavement Support Payment (BSP) is reviewed annually on a discretionary basis as part of the uprating process. As BSP is not a cost‑of‑living benefit, it is not automatically linked to inflation. While factors such as Consumer Prices Index (CPI) may be considered in the annual review, there is no requirement to link to CPI and no fixed methodology for determining changes to its value. |
|
Bereavement Benefits: Income Support
Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford) Monday 6th July 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, for what reason there is no dedicated bereavement-related income support payment paid directly or specifically in respect of bereaved children. Answered by Andrew Western - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) Bereavement Support Payment aims to provide support during the acute period following a bereavement by way of an initial lump sum followed by up to 18 monthly instalments with a higher amount paid for those with dependent children. Longer-term financial support is delivered through the wider welfare system, including through Universal Credit, Child Benefit and other forms of local support where appropriate. School support, local family help services and wider health services all play a role in meeting the longer-term emotional needs of bereaved children. |
|
Growth Guarantee Scheme
Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford) Monday 6th July 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what steps his Department is taking to monitor how accredited lenders are applying the Growth Guarantee Scheme, including the use of personal guarantees, the interest rates being charged, and the criteria used to assess applications from viable small businesses; and whether he will require the British Business Bank to publish annual performance data for the Scheme, including application volumes, approval and decline rates, average APRs, and the proportion of facilities supported by personal guarantees. Answered by Blair McDougall - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade) (Jointly with the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) Accredited lenders must operate within Growth Guarantee Scheme (GGS) rules and the British Business Bank (BBB) monitors lenders to ensure compliance with those requirements. Decisions on individual lending applications, including the assessment of whether a business meets GGS eligibility criteria, the use of personal guarantees and the interest rates charged, are decisions for accredited lenders, undertaken in accordance with the Scheme's rules and each lender's own credit and risk assessment processes. The BBB publishes quarterly performance data for GGS, including information on the number and value of facilities, sectoral and regional distribution, the characteristics of supported businesses, and portfolio performance. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 13th July Mohammad Yasin signed this EDM on Tuesday 14th July 2026 Memorial plaque for Ann Widdecombe 41 signatures (Most recent: 16 Jul 2026)Tabled by: Peter Bedford (Conservative - Mid Leicestershire) That this House expresses its profound sadness at the death of Ann Widdecombe and condemns the violence that led to her death; extends its deepest condolences to her family, friends and all those who knew and admired her; recognises her distinguished record of public service, including her 23 years as … |
|
Tuesday 23rd June Mohammad Yasin signed this EDM on Tuesday 30th June 2026 20 signatures (Most recent: 8 Jul 2026) Tabled by: Clive Betts (Labour - Sheffield South East) That this House expresses grave concern at reports of violence against peaceful Southern protesters in Aden, Shabwa and Hadramaut who are demonstrating for their political rights and the principle of self-determination and their support for the Southern transitional council; condemns the killing, injury and arbitrary detention of protesters and activists; … |