Information between 5th December 2025 - 15th December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 395 Noes - 98 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 96 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 305 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 162 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 162 |
|
8 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 308 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 96 |
|
9 Dec 2025 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 332 |
|
9 Dec 2025 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 173 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Seasonal Work - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 325 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Seasonal Work - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 312 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 320 Noes - 98 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Conduct of the Chancellor of the Exchequer - View Vote Context Mohammad Yasin voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 90 Noes - 297 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Mohammad Yasin speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Mohammad Yasin contributed 2 speeches (99 words) Wednesday 10th December 2025 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Mohammad Yasin speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Mohammad Yasin contributed 1 speech (78 words) Monday 8th December 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
|
Mohammad Yasin speeches from: Child Poverty Strategy
Mohammad Yasin contributed 1 speech (79 words) Monday 8th December 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for International Development |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
5G: Infrastructure
Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford) Thursday 11th December 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps the Government is taking to help ensure that telecommunications operators engaging in permitted development applications for 5G infrastructure adequately consult and engage with local communities, particularly in residential areas; and what guidance is provided to local planning authorities on assessing siting and appearance under permitted development rules. Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Electronic communications code operators using permitted development rights are required to follow the Code of Practice for Wireless Network Development in England.
The code has an important role in making sure that appropriate engagement takes place with local communities and other interested parties. Guidance on permitted development rights is available on gov.uk here. |
|
Motability
Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford) Friday 12th December 2025 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of recent changes to the Motability scheme, including the removal of certain vehicle brands, the introduction of VAT on advance payments and Insurance Premium Tax on scheme insurance, and operational changes to breakdown cover and mileage allowances, on disabled people’s access to suitable vehicles; and if he will publish the estimated cost savings arising from each change, the criteria used to determine which vehicle categories were removed, and which Ministers approved these decisions. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) We are protecting the taxpayer through changes to the Motability scheme, ensuring it supports disabled people whilst delivering efficient use of taxpayers’ money. This includes the removal of some luxury vehicles from the leasing scheme while maintaining a range of vehicles to support disabled people. Tax changes will not impact vehicles substantially adapted for wheelchair users, or existing leases, and Motability will continue to provide vehicles at no additional cost to the value of eligible disability benefits.
Decisions on tax were made in the usual way by HM Treasury ministers, in close consultation with DWP Ministers and based on extensive advice with due consideration of equalities impacts. Estimated cost savings were published in the budget documentation: Motability Scheme: reforming tax reliefs - GOV.UK |
|
Speed Limits: Cameras
Asked by: Mohammad Yasin (Labour - Bedford) Friday 12th December 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what funding is available to support (a) local authorities and (b) police forces with initial installation costs for fixed speed-enforcement cameras. Answered by Lilian Greenwood - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury Part of the money received from drivers attending courses under the National Driver Offending Retraining Scheme (NDORS) goes to the local Road Safety Partnership, where one exists, which includes the local authority, the police and other partners. This is ringfenced to be used for road safety purposes, including the installation and maintenance of safety cameras. Local authorities and the police are also able to use other unringfenced grants to fund additional road safety activity in their area. In areas with no road safety partnership, the funding from NDORS courses goes to the police.
|
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
8 Dec 2025, 6:36 p.m. - House of Commons " Mohammad Yasin thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. The child poverty strategy includes welcome measures strategy includes welcome measures for families in Bedford and Kempston from removing the two child limit to expanding free " Mohammad Yasin MP (Bedford, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
8 Dec 2025, 3:22 p.m. - House of Commons " Mohammad Yasin speaker, my constituent in his mid-fifties constituent in his mid-fifties wrote to me about the flagrant and extensive age discrimination he faces looking for work, citing a " Mohammad Yasin MP (Bedford, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |