Information between 19th October 2025 - 29th October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 313 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 12 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 10 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 389 Noes - 102 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Seventh sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 381 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 10 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 390 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 307 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 11 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 8 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 8 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 10 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Seventh sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 10 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Eighth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 8 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 8 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 104 Noes - 317 |
|
23 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 9 Noes - 2 |
|
23 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Tenth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 9 Noes - 3 |
|
23 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Tenth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 4 Noes - 9 |
|
23 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Tenth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 9 |
|
23 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Ninth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 9 Noes - 4 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 5 Noes - 11 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 10 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 10 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 13 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 11 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 11 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Eleventh sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 11 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 11 Noes - 3 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Eleventh sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 11 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Eleventh sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 11 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 11 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - China Spying Case - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 318 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 174 Noes - 327 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Stamp Duty Land Tax - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 313 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 329 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 2 Noes - 9 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 9 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 10 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 3 Noes - 9 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill (Twelfth sitting) - View Vote Context Mike Reader voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 10 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 6 Noes - 10 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Immigration
Asked by: Mike Reader (Labour - Northampton South) Tuesday 28th October 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many households which include children born in the UK include (a) one and (b) two adults with indefinite leave to remain. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) The information requested is not centrally held. |
| MP Financial Interests |
|---|
|
20th October 2025
Mike Reader (Labour - Northampton South) 4. Visits outside the UK International visit to Bahrain between 02 May 2025 and 05 May 2025 Source |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 11th November 2025 2:30 p.m. Ministry of Justice Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Justice (including Topical Questions) Clive Jones: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Bob Blackman: What steps he is taking with Cabinet colleagues to reform human rights laws. Lincoln Jopp: What discussions he has had with Cabinet colleagues on the use of catapults as offensive weapons. Claire Young: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Peter Lamb: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Liz Saville Roberts: What his Department's policy is on the use of the Welsh language in prisons. Wera Hobhouse: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Ian Sollom: What steps she is taking to support the Probation Service. Edward Leigh: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Beccy Cooper: What steps his Department is taking through the criminal justice system to help tackle violence against women and girls. Bradley Thomas: What steps his Department is taking to help support the Probation Service to manage repeat offenders who cross jurisdictional boundaries to avoid supervision. John Cooper: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Ben Maguire: What steps he is taking to increase access to legal aid for people in rural areas. Harpreet Uppal: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Ian Lavery: What steps his Department is taking to help increase access to justice for people from all social backgrounds. Rachel Hopkins: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Bradley Thomas: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Andrew Cooper: What steps his Department is taking to use technology to improve the efficiency of the criminal justice system. Jacob Collier: If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Helen Morgan: What steps he is taking to tackle backlogs in the courts. Jonathan Brash: What assessment he has made of the potential implications for his policies of the number of prisoners serving Imprisonment for Public Protection sentences. Mary Kelly Foy: What recent assessment he has made of the potential merits of lowering the pension age of prison officers. Elsie Blundell: What steps his Department is taking through the criminal justice system to help support victims of technology-assisted child sexual abuse. Roz Savage: What steps she is taking through the criminal justice system to help support victims of environmental crimes. Fred Thomas: What steps his Department is taking to help improve rehabilitation outcomes for people with unspent convictions. Anna Dixon: What steps his Department is taking through the criminal justice system to help tackle violence against women and girls. Andy McDonald: What steps he is taking with Cabinet colleagues to help ensure that workers receive tribunal awards in cases where the respondent company has entered administration. Vikki Slade: What steps his Department is taking to provide adequate funding for the courts system. Julian Smith: Whether he plans to bring forward legislative proposals on litigation funding agreements. Gagan Mohindra: What steps he is taking to help support victims of crime through the criminal justice system. Olivia Blake: When he plans to increase legal aid fees. Mike Reader: What steps his Department is taking to provide adequate funding to the Probation Service for meeting its additional responsibilities in the Sentencing Bill. Sarah Owen: What steps his Department is taking to support victims of rape and sexual violence through the court system. Al Pinkerton: What assessment his Department has made of the adequacy of safeguards for preventing harm to children during court-ordered contact arrangements. Luke Murphy: What steps he is taking to help tackle court backlogs. View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Building Safety Regulator
28 speeches (11,347 words) Thursday 23rd October 2025 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Chris Curtis (Lab - Milton Keynes North) Friend the Member for Northampton South (Mike Reader) and I sought this debate because of the growing - Link to Speech 2: Neil Coyle (Lab - Bermondsey and Old Southwark) Friends the Members for Milton Keynes North (Chris Curtis) and for Northampton South (Mike Reader) and - Link to Speech 3: Joe Powell (Lab - Kensington and Bayswater) Friends the Members for Northampton South (Mike Reader) and for Milton Keynes North (Chris Curtis) on - Link to Speech 4: Chris Curtis (Lab - Milton Keynes North) Friend the Member for Northampton South (Mike Reader) and the hon. - Link to Speech |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 29th October 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: UK refineries and the role of oil and gas At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Elizabeth de Jong - CEO at Fuels Industry UK Benj Sykes - Head of Ørsted UK at Ørsted UK Paul Greenwood - UK Chair at ExxonMobil At 4:00pm: Oral evidence Stuart Payne - Chief Executive at North Sea Transition Authority Katy Heidenreich - Supply Chain & People Director at Offshore Energies UK Harriet Eisner - Regional Co-Ordinating Officer at Unite View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 12th November 2025 2:30 p.m. Energy Security and Net Zero Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Unlocking community energy at scale At 3:00pm: Oral evidence Councillor Emily O'Brien - Climate Change Cabinet member at Lewes District Council and UK100 Climate Leadership Academy Graduate Tanuja Pandit - CEO at Power Up North London Eleanor Radcliffe - Project Manager, Energy Commons Team at Carbon Co-op At 4:00pm: Oral evidence Robbie Calvert - Head of Policy and Public Affairs at Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) Dan Stone - Policy and Influencing Officer at Centre for Sustainable Energy Jenny Wigley, KC - Planning Barrister at Landmark Chambers View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
30 Oct 2025
Managing the future of UK oil and gas Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 7 Jan 2026) Following an initial evidence session in Parliament on the role of the UK’s refinery industry in the energy transition, the Committee is launching a new inquiry and call for evidence on the future of UK oil and gas. Data from the oil and gas industry shows that it directly supports around 26,000 jobs across the UK and indirectly supports 95,000 more – through offshore drilling, rigging, catering and scaffolding, and onshore fabrication yards, anchor manufacturing, vessel maintenance and more. There are an estimated, further 84,000 jobs for hospitality workers and taxi drivers that serve these industrial communities. The UK has of course experienced previous energy and industrial transitions with the closure of its coal mines in the 1980s, and more recently the closure of major steel manufacturing works. The harsh experience of deindustrialisation has raised concerns that large, skilled workforces may bear the brunt of moving away from fossil fuels. The successful redeployment of the workforce at the UK’s last coal power plant Ratcliffe may prove difficult to replicate for the sector-wide transition away from oil & gas. Yet a key element in delivering the energy transition will be to ensure that the benefits from existing fossil fuel extraction can be utilised in establishing the industry that will replace it. In the initial session in Parliament on October 29, witnesses from the industry highlighted the need to address the oil and gas industry’s fiscal environment. They reinforced the Scottish Affairs Committee’s conclusion that there needs to be a revision to the Energy Profits Levy where “a lack of clarity on the fiscal regime beyond 2030 has created uncertainty for industry in the North Sea. The Energy Profits Levy at its current rate of 38%, which brings the headline rate of tax to 78%, is seen by many in industry as no longer proportionate”. The Committee also heard a further call to ensure that refineries were included in the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, so they could compete on a level playing field with foreign based competitors in what is a global market. The Committee is now launching a full inquiry into the role of oil and gas in the energy transition, the management of the UK’s North Sea energy basin and how the transition away from gas in home heating might be achieved. It will aim to:
|
|
5 Nov 2025
International climate policy Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 7 Jan 2026) Ahead of COP 30, where host country Brazil’s Presidency has set a strategic goal to transition from “negotiation to implementation”, the Committee is launching a call for evidence in a major new inquiry on UK climate policy and finance. Climate change is a global problem that requires a global response. The world is now experiencing the increasingly severe impacts of a rapidly heating climate with intense wildfires, severe droughts, and heavy rainfall leading to destructive floods more frequently and over a wider range. The 2015 Paris Agreement represented a significant moment of international coordination to reduce emissions and to adapt to climate change. But the UN recently announced that global action has failed to limit global heating to the 1.5 degrees agreed there. In 2022, the IPCC warned that “any further delay in concerted global action will miss a brief and rapidly closing window to secure a liveable future”. The UK became the first country in the world to make a legally-binding national commitment to cut greenhouse gas emissions in The Climate Change Act 2008. In 2019 the UK was the first major economy to enshrine its commitment to Net Zero by 2050 in law. At COP 29 in Baku last year, the agreed target for climate finance flowing to developing countries was increased from $100 billion to at least $300 billion a year by 2035, with an aspiration for that to hit $1.3 trillion per year over the same period, in recognition of the scale of the challenge. And in 2022, the latest data available, developed countries delivered around $116 billion – over that target - to developing countries for climate action. But the global political consensus on climate change, the financial sector’s commitment to action on climate and climate diplomacy have all been impacted by tensions and transformations in the global order. The UK Government has stated “there is no global stability without climate stability”, that the UK “must play its part by resetting at home and reconnecting abroad”, and has placed an emphasis on re-establishing the UK “as a climate leader on the global stage”. It committed to meet the previous Government’s pledge of providing £11.6 billion in international climate finance between 2021 and 2026 - but beyond March 2026 the approach is unclear. Through this inquiry, the Committee intends to investigate how the Government can best demonstrate international leadership on climate policy. |
|
17 Jul 2025
Planning for nuclear energy generation Energy Security and Net Zero Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The UK is embarking on an ambitious programme of investment in nuclear energy, seeking to reverse decades of declining capacity. The Government is counting on new nuclear to help deliver energy security and decarbonise electricity generation. Announcing funding for the Sizewell C nuclear power plant in June, the Energy Secretary said “we need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance.” But past promises of a golden age of nuclear energy have so far failed to materialise. A new reactor has not been connected to the grid for 30 years. Nuclear projects have historically faced unique barriers, including complex regulatory and planning processes. The Government now aims to deliver reforms to streamline planning approvals and give greater certainty to developers. Consultation and scrutiny of EN-7The National Policy Statement for Nuclear Energy Generation (EN-7) has been put forward to help guide planners as they seek to make decisions on siting new nuclear infrastructure. Under the Planning Act 2008, a National Policy Statement (NPS) like EN-7 must undergo public consultation and parliamentary scrutiny before it can be formally designated. EN-7 has undergone two rounds of consultation: the first focused on potential changes to the nuclear siting approach; the second introduced the full draft text. The Committee is now beginning the parliamentary scrutiny process, offering MPs the opportunity to hear from industry, experts, and the public to examine the implications of the framework set out in EN-7 in detail. What is EN-7?EN-7 is intended to become the principal guide for decisions on future nuclear power stations in England and Wales. Nuclear infrastructure proposals are currently limited to eight sites in England and Wales. EN-7 replaces this with a criteria-based approach. It is also intended to support development of a broader range of nuclear technologies like Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) and Advanced Modular Reactors (AMRs), as well as traditional gigawatt-scale plants. The aim is to create a future-proof planning framework that enables a pipeline of new nuclear projects to come forward. Call for EvidenceThe Energy Security and Net Zero Committee is now inviting written submissions to help assess whether EN-7 provides a coherent and effective framework for enabling the UK’s nuclear ambitions. |