All 2 Debates between Mike Gapes and Paul Blomfield

Wed 20th Dec 2017
European Union (Withdrawal) Bill
Commons Chamber

Committee: 8th sitting: House of Commons
Wed 8th Feb 2017
European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill
Commons Chamber

3rd reading: House of Commons & Committee: 3rd sitting: House of Commons & Report stage: House of Commons

European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

Debate between Mike Gapes and Paul Blomfield
Paul Blomfield Portrait Paul Blomfield
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The worry is that either they are not conducting them or they are conducting them and not sharing them in the way that was required.

Mike Gapes Portrait Mike Gapes
- Hansard - -

Could not there be another, far more simple, explanation—that the Secretary of State is heading a Department that should be renamed “the Department for Winging It”?

Paul Blomfield Portrait Paul Blomfield
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is probably the sort of phrase that the Secretary of State might use on some occasions.

On 2 February 2017, the Secretary of State told the House:

“We continue to analyse the impact of our exit across the breadth of the UK economy, covering more than 50 sectors—I think it was 58 at the last count—to shape our negotiating position.”—[Official Report, 2 February 2017; Vol. 620, c. 1218.]

Was he right? Or was the hon. Member for Harwich and North Essex (Mr Jenkin) right when he said recently that the Secretary of State

“has never actually referred to impact assessments… These were a fiction of the media and the Labour party”?

If the Government are playing with semantics, claiming that assessments of impact and impact assessments are not the same thing, they should be aware that they are at serious risk of misleading the House. Even more worryingly, have they, as we have heard suggested, actually not undertaken this work at all? Are they hiding these assessments in semantics—hiding them from the House and from the Select Committee—or do they not even have any work to hide?

European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill

Debate between Mike Gapes and Paul Blomfield
3rd reading: House of Commons & Committee: 3rd sitting: House of Commons & Report stage: House of Commons
Wednesday 8th February 2017

(7 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017 View all European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Committee of the whole House Amendments as at 8 February 2017 - (8 Feb 2017)
Paul Blomfield Portrait Paul Blomfield
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We have said time and again that we believe in the reasonable management of migration through the application of fair rules, and I will talk about that specific issue if hon. and right hon. Members will give me the opportunity.

Mike Gapes Portrait Mike Gapes (Ilford South) (Lab/Co-op)
- Hansard - -

Will my hon. Friend give way?

Paul Blomfield Portrait Paul Blomfield
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have probably been a little unbalanced, so I should give way to somebody on my side of the House.

Mike Gapes Portrait Mike Gapes
- Hansard - -

I am grateful. Will my hon. Friend confirm that the easiest way to cut migration would be to crash the economy?

Paul Blomfield Portrait Paul Blomfield
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend should wait and hear what I am about to say on migration.