Information between 12th May 2025 - 22nd May 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Michelle Welsh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 95 |
|
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Michelle Welsh voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 402 |
|
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Michelle Welsh voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 311 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 90 Noes - 318 |
|
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Michelle Welsh voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 94 Noes - 315 |
|
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Michelle Welsh voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 404 |
|
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Michelle Welsh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 291 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 168 |
|
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Michelle Welsh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 294 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 366 Noes - 98 |
|
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Michelle Welsh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 68 |
|
14 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Michelle Welsh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 98 |
|
16 May 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Michelle Welsh voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 200 Labour No votes vs 129 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 243 Noes - 279 |
|
16 May 2025 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context Michelle Welsh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 206 Labour Aye votes vs 127 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 239 |
|
21 May 2025 - Immigration - View Vote Context Michelle Welsh voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 242 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 267 |
|
21 May 2025 - Business and the Economy - View Vote Context Michelle Welsh voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 246 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 253 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Taxation
Asked by: Michelle Welsh (Labour - Sherwood Forest) Monday 12th May 2025 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether her Department has considered the potential merits of using income from tax obtained by the sale of (a) tobacco, (b) alcohol and (c) gambling on prevention education. Answered by James Murray - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) The allocations of all revenues received by the Government are decided in the round alongside broader fiscal and economic objectives. Widespread hypothecation of tax revenues can undermine the Government’s ability to flexibly manage the public finances.
|
| MP Financial Interests |
|---|
|
12th May 2025
Michelle Welsh (Labour - Sherwood Forest) 3. Gifts, benefits and hospitality from UK sources The Football Association - £550.00 Source |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Thursday 24th April Michelle Welsh signed this EDM on Wednesday 14th May 2025 30 signatures (Most recent: 2 Jun 2025) Tabled by: Jess Asato (Labour - Lowestoft) That this House celebrates Foster Care Fortnight from May 12 to May 25 in its aim to raise awareness about fostering and highlight the transformative role of foster carers; recognises the importance of foster care for providing children who are unable to live with their families with a safe, stable … |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 20th May 2025 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Mission Government At 10:00am: Oral evidence Anna Garrod - Director of Policy and Impact at Demos Nathan Yeowell - Executive Director at Future Governance Forum Joe Hill - Policy Director at Reform think tank View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 20th May 2025 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Mission Government At 10:00am: Oral evidence Anna Garrod - Director of Policy and Impact at Demos Nathan Yeowell - Executive Director at Future Governance Forum Joe Hill - Policy Director at Re:State View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 10th June 2025 9:30 a.m. Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The work of the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments At 10:00am: Oral evidence The Rt Hon. the Lord Pickles - Former Chair of the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
3 Jun 2025
Propriety, ethics and the wider standards landscape in the UK Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 26 Aug 2025) The Government has a manifesto commitment to “restore confidence in government and ensure ministers are held to the highest standards". Trust in government and the political system more widely is essential to the proper functioning and prosperity of a democratic state. Concerns with ethical standards are not new, however controversy surrounding the propriety of conduct of those in public life was a particularly prominent part of political life during the last parliament. This has raised questions as to whether the current system of ethical standards regulation is sufficient or even fit for purpose. Read the call for evidence for more detail about the inquiry. |