All 3 Debates between Michelle Donelan and Matt Hancock

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Michelle Donelan and Matt Hancock
Thursday 21st June 2018

(6 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Michelle Donelan Portrait Michelle Donelan (Chippenham) (Con)
- Hansard - -

11. What steps his Department is taking to reduce problem gambling.

Matt Hancock Portrait The Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (Matt Hancock)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We take problem gambling very seriously and have taken decisive action on fixed odds betting terminals. We are determined to tackle that social blight and have decided to cut the maximum stake to £2.

Matt Hancock Portrait Matt Hancock
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

In our response to the consultation, we set out significant further steps to strengthen the safeguards for online gambling. The Gambling Commission already has a whole series of requirements in that area. There is more to do, and we are getting on with it.

Michelle Donelan Portrait Michelle Donelan
- Hansard - -

As the Secretary of State knows, I am strongly supportive of the decision taken on FOBTs, but problem gambling is an issue in my constituency, especially among the vulnerable. What more can the Department do to push gambling companies to better support addicts?

Matt Hancock Portrait Matt Hancock
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am grateful for my hon. Friend’s support and for that of many Members across the House for the action we are taking on problem gambling. Clearly it is important to ensure that we tackle online issues as well. That is complicated by the nature of the technology, but the Gambling Commission is working hard to ensure that the right protections are in place.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Michelle Donelan and Matt Hancock
Thursday 10th May 2018

(6 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Michelle Donelan Portrait Michelle Donelan
- Hansard - -

Will the Minister join me in congratulating AFC Corsham, which battled the heat on Saturday to play a 12-hour football match in aid of the wonderful charity Scotty’s Little Soldiers?

Matt Hancock Portrait Matt Hancock
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Of course I will.

Blagging: Leveson Inquiry

Debate between Michelle Donelan and Matt Hancock
Wednesday 7th March 2018

(6 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Urgent Questions are proposed each morning by backbench MPs, and up to two may be selected each day by the Speaker. Chosen Urgent Questions are announced 30 minutes before Parliament sits each day.

Each Urgent Question requires a Government Minister to give a response on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Matt Hancock Portrait Matt Hancock
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

These are allegations of criminal behaviour that are printed in a newspaper—a newspaper that supported the approach we took on Thursday—so they are being printed in the media and discussed in this House. Allegations of criminal behaviour should of course be dealt with properly by the police in the normal way.

Michelle Donelan Portrait Michelle Donelan (Chippenham) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Does my right hon. Friend agree that Leveson 2 would not only be very costly and lengthy, but might undermine the freedom of our press, be disproportionate and, given that newspapers’ circulation has been declining while digital media consumption has been increasing, be too narrow?

Matt Hancock Portrait Matt Hancock
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is quite right: we have to make sure that we have in place vibrant high-quality journalism and a free press that can hold the powerful to account. Some people may not like that, but it is an incredibly important part of having high-quality political discourse and, ultimately, liberal democracy as we know it. That is what we are focused on.

My hon. Friend mentions the costs, which I had not even come on to. The potential cost of another Leveson inquiry is estimated to be about £5 million. I think that that is money better spent ensuring there is a sustainable future for high-quality journalism.