Mel Stride Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Mel Stride

Information between 29th June 2025 - 9th July 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Calendar
Monday 7th July 2025
Mel Stride (Conservative - Central Devon)

Urgent question - Main Chamber
Subject: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if she will make a statement on the Government’s performance against the fiscal rules
View calendar - Add to calendar


Division Votes
1 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context
Mel Stride voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 100 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 260
2 Jul 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context
Mel Stride voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 158
2 Jul 2025 - Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism - View Vote Context
Mel Stride voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 87 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 385 Noes - 26
2 Jul 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context
Mel Stride voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 168
2 Jul 2025 - Prisons - View Vote Context
Mel Stride voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 89 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 168
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mel Stride voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 92 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 346
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mel Stride voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 86 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 415 Noes - 98
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mel Stride voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 338


Speeches
Mel Stride speeches from: Government Performance against Fiscal Rules
Mel Stride contributed 4 speeches (387 words)
Monday 7th July 2025 - Commons Chamber
HM Treasury
Mel Stride speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Mel Stride contributed 2 speeches (142 words)
Tuesday 1st July 2025 - Commons Chamber
HM Treasury


Written Answers
Taxation: International Cooperation
Asked by: Mel Stride (Conservative - Central Devon)
Friday 4th July 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate she has made of the potential impact of the G7 agreement on global minimum tax on additional revenue to the public purse in each of the next five financial years.

Answered by James Murray - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)

The Chancellor, alongside her G7 counterparts, has reached an understanding on a proposed path forward for the global minimum tax, Pillar 2 of the G20/OECD Inclusive Framework project on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS).

The G7 published a statement last week that set out our commitment to the core objectives of Pillar 2: tackling multinational tax avoidance and promoting a stable global tax environment that supports fair competition.

Recent discussions have taken into account concerns raised by the US Treasury regarding the interaction of the Pillar 2 rules with the US minimum tax system, and have focused on developing a side-by-side approach that maintains a level playing field.

Importantly, this agreement includes the removal of the retaliatory tax provision (Section 899) in the US’s legislative proposals, which would have imposed a significant additional tax burden on British businesses.

The understanding reached by the G7, and the principles underpinning it, will now be developed in detail and need to be agreed within the wider OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework, which comprises over 140 countries and jurisdictions.

Any changes to UK policy resulting from the final, negotiated solution, will be fully costed by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR).
Work Capability Assessment
Asked by: Mel Stride (Conservative - Central Devon)
Friday 4th July 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the award rate for Work Capability Assessment was (a) in-person, (b) not in-person and (c) across all modes in each of the last 10 years; and whether her Department has made a comparative assessment of award rates for (i) in-person assessments and (ii) other modes of assessment.

Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The information requested on decisions is not collated centrally and could only be provided at disproportionate cost.

However, relevant available information on health professional recommendations has been provided in response to a previous Parliamentary Question:

https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-02-13/31637

The Health Assessment Channels Trial, conducted by the department between May 2022 and March 2023, compared the monetary impact of each Work Capability Assessment channel, focussing on initial claimants eligible for all channels (in-person, telephone or video). The trial found that the proportion of claimants awarded the health element after being allocated an in-person assessment did not differ considerably from the proportion awarded after being allocated a remote channel. We are working on publishing the full results of the trial in due course.

Personal Independence Payment: Medical Examinations
Asked by: Mel Stride (Conservative - Central Devon)
Friday 4th July 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether her Department has made a comparative assessment of award rates for (a) in-person and (b) other modes of PIP assessment.

Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The Health Assessment Channels Trial, conducted by the department between May 2022 and March 2023, compared the monetary impact of each PIP assessment channel, focussing on initial claimants eligible for all channels (in-person, telephone or video). The trial found that the award rates of PIP claimants allocated an in-person assessment did not differ considerably from the proportion of claimants awarded PIP after being allocated a remote channel. We are working on publishing the full results of the trial in due course.

As part of the Functional Assessment Service (FAS) process, a paper-based assessment is always considered first. Where a paper-based review is not possible the claimant will be invited to an assessment.

Before sending an invitation, the assessment supplier considers whether a specific assessment channel is needed due to the claimant’s health or circumstances. Otherwise, claimants are offered the next available appointment, which can be changed if the claimant informs us that a reasonable adjustment is appropriate in their circumstances.

While suppliers recommend awards, the final decisions are made by case managers who may alter these recommendations.

We have also announced a wider review of the PIP assessment to make it fair and fit for purpose, which I am leading. We are bringing together a range of experts, stakeholders and people with lived experience to consider how best to do this. We will provide further details as plans progress. The review is expected to conclude in autumn 2026.

Social Security Benefits: Reform
Asked by: Mel Stride (Conservative - Central Devon)
Monday 7th July 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to her Oral Statement of 30 June 2025 on Welfare Reform, columns 23-25, whether (a) the cost of changes to her welfare reform proposals include the cost of the new severe conditions group, (b) how many people are expected to qualify for that group in each financial year up to and including 2029-30 and (c) what estimate she has made of the additional cost to the exchequer for the creation of that group relative to the spending forecasts produced at Spring Statement 2025.

Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

We published Impact Assessments alongside this Bill in the usual way. These set out who will be impacted, the financial implications of the changes and equality analysis.

To account for the proposed changes to the Bill, the Impact Assessment will be revised and republished. We will provide and update an Impact Assessment to support Commons Committee, as is the usual process when a Bill is amended at this stage.

Universal Credit
Asked by: Mel Stride (Conservative - Central Devon)
Monday 7th July 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to her Oral Statement of 30 June 2025 on Welfare Reform, columns 23-25, what the evidential basis was for her statement that less that 1% of people on universal credit move into work each month.

Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The statistics referred to in that statement related to those on Universal Credit in the Limited Capability for Work and Work-Related Activity Group.

Statistics on the Into Work Rates of Claimants on the Universal Credit Health Journey by month can be found in table T1.14 in Chapter 1 of the Pathway to Work Evidence Pack

chapter-1-case-for-change-evidence.ods

Income Tax
Asked by: Mel Stride (Conservative - Central Devon)
Monday 7th July 2025

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to her Oral Statement of 30 October 2024 on Financial Statement and Budget Report, Official Report, column 821, whether it remains her policy not to extend the freeze on income tax thresholds.

Answered by James Murray - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury)

The Government is committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible while ensuring fiscal responsibility. That is why, at our first Budget, we decided not to extend the freeze on personal tax thresholds.

Employment: Disability
Asked by: Mel Stride (Conservative - Central Devon)
Monday 7th July 2025

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether it remains her Department's policy to spend an additional £1 billion on employment support for people with health conditions and disabilities by 2029-30 relative to pre-Spring Statement plans, following the changes to the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payments Bill; how the further £300 million of funded announced on 30 June 2025 is to be allocated across financial years; and what the total planned spending on employment support for people with health conditions and disabilities was in each financial year to 2029-30 (a) before the Spring Statement and (b) as of 2 July 2025.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

We will spend an additional £1 billion on employment support for people with health conditions and disabilities by 2029-2030 relative to pre-Spring Statement plans, with no impact following changes made to the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payments Bill.

Further details were given by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions’ statement on Welfare Reform given on 30 June.



Early Day Motions Signed
Wednesday 4th June
Mel Stride signed this EDM on Monday 30th June 2025

Mauritius Treaty

107 signatures (Most recent: 1 Jul 2025)
Tabled by: Kemi Badenoch (Conservative - North West Essex)
That the Agreement, done at London and Port Louis on 22 May 2025, between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the Republic of Mauritius concerning the Chagos Archipelago including Diego Garcia, should not be ratified.



Mel Stride mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Government Performance against Fiscal Rules
101 speeches (7,313 words)
Monday 7th July 2025 - Commons Chamber
HM Treasury
Mentions:
1: Yuan Yang (Lab - Earley and Woodley) Member for Central Devon (Sir Mel Stride), has announced that he has reflected on the mistakes made by - Link to Speech

Welfare Reform
158 speeches (15,528 words)
Monday 30th June 2025 - Commons Chamber
Department for Work and Pensions
Mentions:
1: Liz Kendall (Lab - Leicester West) Member for Central Devon (Sir Mel Stride), claim that they had a plan to cut £12 billion from the welfare - Link to Speech



Select Committee Documents
Wednesday 2nd July 2025
Written Evidence - Autistica
AAC0105 - Autism Act 2009

Autism Act 2009 - Autism Act 2009 Committee

Found: Mental health culture has gone too far, says Mel Stride.