Maya Ellis Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Maya Ellis

Information between 12th August 2026 - 11th September 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
4 Sep 2026 - House of Commons - View Vote Context
Maya Ellis voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 53 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 1 Noes - 79
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context
Maya Ellis voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 289 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 297
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context
Maya Ellis voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 293 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 302
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context
Maya Ellis voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 292 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 357
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context
Maya Ellis voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 79 Noes - 300
11 Sep 2026 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context
Maya Ellis voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 153 Labour No votes vs 190 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 286


Speeches
Maya Ellis speeches from: Youth Parliament: Government Support
Maya Ellis contributed 1 speech (92 words)
Wednesday 9th September 2026 - Westminster Hall
Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport
Maya Ellis speeches from: Infants, Parents and Carers Bill
Maya Ellis contributed 2 speeches (1,977 words)
2nd reading
Friday 4th September 2026 - Commons Chamber
Department of Health and Social Care


Written Answers
Learning Disability: Nurses
Asked by: Maya Ellis (Labour - Ribble Valley)
Wednesday 19th August 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to address the decline in the recruitment of learning disability nurses.

Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

We recognise the vital role that learning disability nurses play in supporting people with a learning disability and reducing health inequalities.

To support recruitment, the Department provides eligible healthcare students with a non-repayable grant of at least ÂŁ5,000 per academic year via the NHS Learning Support Fund. Students undertaking priority specialisms, including learning disability nursing, can receive an additional incentive payment.

NHS England has also established a learning disability nurse expert group which aims to work with stakeholders to consider how we ensure sustainability of education programmes and attract people onto learning disability nursing and grow the workforce.

More widely, the Government is investing ÂŁ65 million to deliver 2,000 additional nursing degree apprenticeships over the next three years. We will prioritise areas of greatest need and ensure that communities relying most on the National Health Service benefit from a stronger, more resilient workforce. The forthcoming 10 Year Workforce Plan will set out how we ensure the NHS has the right people in the right places, with the right skills to care for patients, when they need it.


Miscarriage: Medical Records
Asked by: Maya Ellis (Labour - Ribble Valley)
Tuesday 25th August 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how the Single Patient Record could improve the recording of miscarriage across NHS services; and what steps are being taken to reduce the risk of double counting the same miscarriage recorded by different services.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

It has historically been difficult to gather accurate and comprehensive data on miscarriages. While data is collected on those miscarriages that occur during hospital stays, the majority occur outside of healthcare settings, and it is the choice of the woman affected whether she discloses that information to healthcare professionals.

The Single Patient Record (SPR) aims to provide a more joined-up view of a patient’s health and care history, reducing the need for the same information to be recorded multiple times across different systems. Maternity is one of the priority care pathways for the roll out of the SPR, with early implementation starting in 2027.

The SPR will help to address the lack of miscarriage data by better enabling the National Health Service and supporting organisations to record miscarriages wherever they may be reported across different care settings. We will continue to consider this as implementation progresses.

It is not currently mandatory for trusts to record second trimester miscarriage through the Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS). The requirements for the next iteration of the MSDS include more detailed data collection around pregnancy outcomes, including on miscarriage.

Timescales for this next iteration will be confirmed in due course. We will also consider what changes may be required to the Digital Maternity Record Standard as part of wider maternity data architecture design work, which will also support the MSDS and the SPR.

Miscarriage: Medical Records
Asked by: Maya Ellis (Labour - Ribble Valley)
Tuesday 25th August 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how the Single Patient Record could improve the recording of miscarriage across NHS services and what steps he is taking to help reduce the risk of double counting the same miscarriage recorded by different services.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

It has historically been difficult to gather accurate and comprehensive data on miscarriages. While data is collected on those miscarriages that occur during hospital stays, the majority occur outside of healthcare settings, and it is the choice of the woman affected whether she discloses that information to healthcare professionals.

The Single Patient Record (SPR) aims to provide a more joined-up view of a patient’s health and care history, reducing the need for the same information to be recorded multiple times across different systems. Maternity is one of the priority care pathways for the roll out of the SPR, with early implementation starting in 2027.

The SPR will help to address the lack of miscarriage data by better enabling the National Health Service and supporting organisations to record miscarriages wherever they may be reported across different care settings. We will continue to consider this as implementation progresses.

It is not currently mandatory for trusts to record second trimester miscarriage through the Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS). The requirements for the next iteration of the MSDS include more detailed data collection around pregnancy outcomes, including on miscarriage.

Timescales for this next iteration will be confirmed in due course. We will also consider what changes may be required to the Digital Maternity Record Standard as part of wider maternity data architecture design work, which will also support the MSDS and the SPR.

Miscarriage: Medical Records
Asked by: Maya Ellis (Labour - Ribble Valley)
Tuesday 25th August 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether an update to the Digital Maternity Record Standard is planned to limit birth outcome to coded values and ensure that a value is included for second trimester miscarriage.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

It has historically been difficult to gather accurate and comprehensive data on miscarriages. While data is collected on those miscarriages that occur during hospital stays, the majority occur outside of healthcare settings, and it is the choice of the woman affected whether she discloses that information to healthcare professionals.

The Single Patient Record (SPR) aims to provide a more joined-up view of a patient’s health and care history, reducing the need for the same information to be recorded multiple times across different systems. Maternity is one of the priority care pathways for the roll out of the SPR, with early implementation starting in 2027.

The SPR will help to address the lack of miscarriage data by better enabling the National Health Service and supporting organisations to record miscarriages wherever they may be reported across different care settings. We will continue to consider this as implementation progresses.

It is not currently mandatory for trusts to record second trimester miscarriage through the Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS). The requirements for the next iteration of the MSDS include more detailed data collection around pregnancy outcomes, including on miscarriage.

Timescales for this next iteration will be confirmed in due course. We will also consider what changes may be required to the Digital Maternity Record Standard as part of wider maternity data architecture design work, which will also support the MSDS and the SPR.

Miscarriage: Medical Records
Asked by: Maya Ellis (Labour - Ribble Valley)
Tuesday 25th August 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what plans he has to improve the recording of miscarriage experienced by women engaged with NHS services.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

It has historically been difficult to gather accurate and comprehensive data on miscarriages. While data is collected on those miscarriages that occur during hospital stays, the majority occur outside of healthcare settings, and it is the choice of the woman affected whether she discloses that information to healthcare professionals.

The Single Patient Record (SPR) aims to provide a more joined-up view of a patient’s health and care history, reducing the need for the same information to be recorded multiple times across different systems. Maternity is one of the priority care pathways for the roll out of the SPR, with early implementation starting in 2027.

The SPR will help to address the lack of miscarriage data by better enabling the National Health Service and supporting organisations to record miscarriages wherever they may be reported across different care settings. We will continue to consider this as implementation progresses.

It is not currently mandatory for trusts to record second trimester miscarriage through the Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS). The requirements for the next iteration of the MSDS include more detailed data collection around pregnancy outcomes, including on miscarriage.

Timescales for this next iteration will be confirmed in due course. We will also consider what changes may be required to the Digital Maternity Record Standard as part of wider maternity data architecture design work, which will also support the MSDS and the SPR.

Miscarriage: Medical Records
Asked by: Maya Ellis (Labour - Ribble Valley)
Tuesday 25th August 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what plans NHS England has to improve the collection of second trimester miscarriage data through the Maternity Services Dataset.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

It has historically been difficult to gather accurate and comprehensive data on miscarriages. While data is collected on those miscarriages that occur during hospital stays, the majority occur outside of healthcare settings, and it is the choice of the woman affected whether she discloses that information to healthcare professionals.

The Single Patient Record (SPR) aims to provide a more joined-up view of a patient’s health and care history, reducing the need for the same information to be recorded multiple times across different systems. Maternity is one of the priority care pathways for the roll out of the SPR, with early implementation starting in 2027.

The SPR will help to address the lack of miscarriage data by better enabling the National Health Service and supporting organisations to record miscarriages wherever they may be reported across different care settings. We will continue to consider this as implementation progresses.

It is not currently mandatory for trusts to record second trimester miscarriage through the Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS). The requirements for the next iteration of the MSDS include more detailed data collection around pregnancy outcomes, including on miscarriage.

Timescales for this next iteration will be confirmed in due course. We will also consider what changes may be required to the Digital Maternity Record Standard as part of wider maternity data architecture design work, which will also support the MSDS and the SPR.




Maya Ellis mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Infants, Parents and Carers Bill
135 speeches (40,335 words)
2nd reading
Friday 4th September 2026 - Commons Chamber
Department of Health and Social Care
Mentions:
1: Kieran Mullan (Con - Bexhill and Battle) Member for Ribble Valley (Maya Ellis), I am an officer of the all-party parliamentary group on babies - Link to Speech
2: Diana Johnson (Lab - Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham) Friend the Member for Ribble Valley (Maya Ellis) that raising children is a public good and we all have - Link to Speech

Longridge Community Hospital
0 speeches (None words)
Tuesday 1st September 2026 - Petitions

Mentions:
1: None —[Presented by Maya Ellis, Official Report, 7 July 2026; Vol. 789, c. 281.] - Link to Speech



Select Committee Documents
Friday 4th September 2026
Formal Minutes - Formal Minutes 2026 - 27 (to 15 July 26)

Committee of Selection

Found: Thompson to be discharged from the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee and Tom Collins and Maya Ellis