Maya Ellis Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Maya Ellis

Information between 23rd August 2026 - 2nd October 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
4 Sep 2026 - House of Commons - View Vote Context
Maya Ellis voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 53 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 1 Noes - 79
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context
Maya Ellis voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 289 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 297
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context
Maya Ellis voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 293 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 302
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context
Maya Ellis voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 292 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 357
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context
Maya Ellis voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 79 Noes - 300
11 Sep 2026 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context
Maya Ellis voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 153 Labour No votes vs 190 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 286


Speeches
Maya Ellis speeches from: Youth Parliament: Government Support
Maya Ellis contributed 1 speech (92 words)
Wednesday 9th September 2026 - Westminster Hall
Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport
Maya Ellis speeches from: Infants, Parents and Carers Bill
Maya Ellis contributed 2 speeches (1,977 words)
2nd reading
Friday 4th September 2026 - Commons Chamber
Department of Health and Social Care


Written Answers
Miscarriage: Medical Records
Asked by: Maya Ellis (Labour - Ribble Valley)
Tuesday 25th August 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how the Single Patient Record could improve the recording of miscarriage across NHS services; and what steps are being taken to reduce the risk of double counting the same miscarriage recorded by different services.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

It has historically been difficult to gather accurate and comprehensive data on miscarriages. While data is collected on those miscarriages that occur during hospital stays, the majority occur outside of healthcare settings, and it is the choice of the woman affected whether she discloses that information to healthcare professionals.

The Single Patient Record (SPR) aims to provide a more joined-up view of a patient’s health and care history, reducing the need for the same information to be recorded multiple times across different systems. Maternity is one of the priority care pathways for the roll out of the SPR, with early implementation starting in 2027.

The SPR will help to address the lack of miscarriage data by better enabling the National Health Service and supporting organisations to record miscarriages wherever they may be reported across different care settings. We will continue to consider this as implementation progresses.

It is not currently mandatory for trusts to record second trimester miscarriage through the Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS). The requirements for the next iteration of the MSDS include more detailed data collection around pregnancy outcomes, including on miscarriage.

Timescales for this next iteration will be confirmed in due course. We will also consider what changes may be required to the Digital Maternity Record Standard as part of wider maternity data architecture design work, which will also support the MSDS and the SPR.

Miscarriage: Medical Records
Asked by: Maya Ellis (Labour - Ribble Valley)
Tuesday 25th August 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how the Single Patient Record could improve the recording of miscarriage across NHS services and what steps he is taking to help reduce the risk of double counting the same miscarriage recorded by different services.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

It has historically been difficult to gather accurate and comprehensive data on miscarriages. While data is collected on those miscarriages that occur during hospital stays, the majority occur outside of healthcare settings, and it is the choice of the woman affected whether she discloses that information to healthcare professionals.

The Single Patient Record (SPR) aims to provide a more joined-up view of a patient’s health and care history, reducing the need for the same information to be recorded multiple times across different systems. Maternity is one of the priority care pathways for the roll out of the SPR, with early implementation starting in 2027.

The SPR will help to address the lack of miscarriage data by better enabling the National Health Service and supporting organisations to record miscarriages wherever they may be reported across different care settings. We will continue to consider this as implementation progresses.

It is not currently mandatory for trusts to record second trimester miscarriage through the Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS). The requirements for the next iteration of the MSDS include more detailed data collection around pregnancy outcomes, including on miscarriage.

Timescales for this next iteration will be confirmed in due course. We will also consider what changes may be required to the Digital Maternity Record Standard as part of wider maternity data architecture design work, which will also support the MSDS and the SPR.

Miscarriage: Medical Records
Asked by: Maya Ellis (Labour - Ribble Valley)
Tuesday 25th August 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether an update to the Digital Maternity Record Standard is planned to limit birth outcome to coded values and ensure that a value is included for second trimester miscarriage.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

It has historically been difficult to gather accurate and comprehensive data on miscarriages. While data is collected on those miscarriages that occur during hospital stays, the majority occur outside of healthcare settings, and it is the choice of the woman affected whether she discloses that information to healthcare professionals.

The Single Patient Record (SPR) aims to provide a more joined-up view of a patient’s health and care history, reducing the need for the same information to be recorded multiple times across different systems. Maternity is one of the priority care pathways for the roll out of the SPR, with early implementation starting in 2027.

The SPR will help to address the lack of miscarriage data by better enabling the National Health Service and supporting organisations to record miscarriages wherever they may be reported across different care settings. We will continue to consider this as implementation progresses.

It is not currently mandatory for trusts to record second trimester miscarriage through the Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS). The requirements for the next iteration of the MSDS include more detailed data collection around pregnancy outcomes, including on miscarriage.

Timescales for this next iteration will be confirmed in due course. We will also consider what changes may be required to the Digital Maternity Record Standard as part of wider maternity data architecture design work, which will also support the MSDS and the SPR.

Miscarriage: Medical Records
Asked by: Maya Ellis (Labour - Ribble Valley)
Tuesday 25th August 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what plans he has to improve the recording of miscarriage experienced by women engaged with NHS services.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

It has historically been difficult to gather accurate and comprehensive data on miscarriages. While data is collected on those miscarriages that occur during hospital stays, the majority occur outside of healthcare settings, and it is the choice of the woman affected whether she discloses that information to healthcare professionals.

The Single Patient Record (SPR) aims to provide a more joined-up view of a patient’s health and care history, reducing the need for the same information to be recorded multiple times across different systems. Maternity is one of the priority care pathways for the roll out of the SPR, with early implementation starting in 2027.

The SPR will help to address the lack of miscarriage data by better enabling the National Health Service and supporting organisations to record miscarriages wherever they may be reported across different care settings. We will continue to consider this as implementation progresses.

It is not currently mandatory for trusts to record second trimester miscarriage through the Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS). The requirements for the next iteration of the MSDS include more detailed data collection around pregnancy outcomes, including on miscarriage.

Timescales for this next iteration will be confirmed in due course. We will also consider what changes may be required to the Digital Maternity Record Standard as part of wider maternity data architecture design work, which will also support the MSDS and the SPR.

Miscarriage: Medical Records
Asked by: Maya Ellis (Labour - Ribble Valley)
Tuesday 25th August 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what plans NHS England has to improve the collection of second trimester miscarriage data through the Maternity Services Dataset.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

It has historically been difficult to gather accurate and comprehensive data on miscarriages. While data is collected on those miscarriages that occur during hospital stays, the majority occur outside of healthcare settings, and it is the choice of the woman affected whether she discloses that information to healthcare professionals.

The Single Patient Record (SPR) aims to provide a more joined-up view of a patient’s health and care history, reducing the need for the same information to be recorded multiple times across different systems. Maternity is one of the priority care pathways for the roll out of the SPR, with early implementation starting in 2027.

The SPR will help to address the lack of miscarriage data by better enabling the National Health Service and supporting organisations to record miscarriages wherever they may be reported across different care settings. We will continue to consider this as implementation progresses.

It is not currently mandatory for trusts to record second trimester miscarriage through the Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS). The requirements for the next iteration of the MSDS include more detailed data collection around pregnancy outcomes, including on miscarriage.

Timescales for this next iteration will be confirmed in due course. We will also consider what changes may be required to the Digital Maternity Record Standard as part of wider maternity data architecture design work, which will also support the MSDS and the SPR.

Parents and Babies: Health Services
Asked by: Maya Ellis (Labour - Ribble Valley)
Friday 18th September 2026

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, in what way national guidance, training frameworks and service specifications for maternity, health visiting and perinatal mental health services support the use of evidence based observational approaches to parent–infant relationships, such as the Newborn Behavioural Observations and the Neonatal Behavioural Assessment Scale.

Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

National guidance and service specifications recognise the importance of early parent-infant relationships and helping parents understand and respond to their baby’s needs. The refreshed Healthy Child Programme guidance and Best Start Family Hubs and Healthy Babies guidance promote evidence-based support for parent-infant relationships, including practitioner observation of interactions between babies and their parents and carers. The Healthy Child Programme guidance and the Best Start Family Hubs and Healthy Babies guidance are available at the following two links:

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a2965046d178a6fb7e32098/Best_start_family_hubs_and_healthy_babies_-_guidance_for_local_authorities.pdf

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a2965046d178a6fb7e32098/Best_start_family_hubs_and_healthy_babies_-_guidance_for_local_authorities.pdf

Through Healthy Babies, we are investing in national workforce development initiatives to increase practitioner skills and confidence in supporting parent-infant relationships in 75 local authorities with high levels of deprivation. These local authorities are expected to train their workforce in evidence-based approaches, such as Video Interaction Guidance.

NHS England also routinely identifies and disseminates best practice and learning across National Health Services and clinical networks to support local delivery of parent-infant relationship support.

Decisions on the use of specific observational approaches, including tools such as Newborn Behavioural Observations and the Neonatal Behavioural Assessment Scale, are made locally by services and appropriately trained practitioners.




Maya Ellis mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Infants, Parents and Carers Bill
135 speeches (40,335 words)
2nd reading
Friday 4th September 2026 - Commons Chamber
Department of Health and Social Care
Mentions:
1: Kieran Mullan (Con - Bexhill and Battle) Member for Ribble Valley (Maya Ellis), I am an officer of the all-party parliamentary group on babies - Link to Speech
2: Diana Johnson (Lab - Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham) Friend the Member for Ribble Valley (Maya Ellis) that raising children is a public good and we all have - Link to Speech

Longridge Community Hospital
0 speeches (None words)
Tuesday 1st September 2026 - Petitions

Mentions:
1: None —[Presented by Maya Ellis, Official Report, 7 July 2026; Vol. 789, c. 281.] - Link to Speech



Select Committee Documents
Tuesday 15th September 2026
Special Report - 2nd Special Report - Science diplomacy: Sovereignty, strategy, and the global race: Government Response

Science and Technology Committee (Commons)

Found: West) (Chair) Tom Collins (Labour; Worcester) Emily Darlington (Labour; Milton Keynes Central) Maya Ellis

Tuesday 15th September 2026
Oral Evidence - Tony Blair Institute, and Startup Coalition

Science and Technology Committee (Commons)

Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Dame Chi Onwurah (Chair); Tom Collins; Emily Darlington; Maya Ellis

Tuesday 15th September 2026
Oral Evidence - Campaign for Science and Engineering, and Royal Society

Science and Technology Committee (Commons)

Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Dame Chi Onwurah (Chair); Tom Collins; Emily Darlington; Maya Ellis

Tuesday 15th September 2026
Oral Evidence - Re:State, and Institute for Government

Science and Technology Committee (Commons)

Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Dame Chi Onwurah (Chair); Tom Collins; Emily Darlington; Maya Ellis

Friday 4th September 2026
Formal Minutes - Formal Minutes 2026 - 27 (to 15 July 26)

Committee of Selection

Found: Thompson to be discharged from the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee and Tom Collins and Maya Ellis