Data Protection Bill [ Lords ] (Fifth sitting) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office
Tuesday 20th March 2018

(6 years, 1 month ago)

Public Bill Committees
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Liam Byrne Portrait Liam Byrne
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The reason we would do that is that there has been an exponential increase in drone strikes by President Trump’s Administration and, as a result, a significant increase in civilian deaths in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Syria and Iraq, Yemen and east Africa. It would be pretty odd for us not to ensure that a piece of legislation had appropriate safeguards, given what we now know about the ambition of one of our most important allies to create flexibility in rules of engagement.

Matt Warman Portrait Matt Warman (Boston and Skegness) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I agree with the right hon. Gentleman on that point, but is not the more important point that our legislation cannot be contingent on that of any other country, however important an ally it is? Our legislation has to stand on its own two feet, and we should seek to ensure that it does. To change something, as he attempts to, purely on the basis of changes over the past couple of years would set a dangerous precedent rather than guard against a potential pitfall.