To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Special Educational Needs
Tuesday 28th July 2026

Asked by: Matt Vickers (Conservative - Stockton West)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of proposed SEND reforms on (a) adopted children and (b) children who have experienced early-life trauma.

Answered by Georgia Gould - Minister of State (Education)

The current system for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) is failing too many children and families. Improving the life chances of children and young people with SEND is the first priority for these reforms, including for adopted children and for those who have experienced early-life trauma. Every child deserves a high-quality, inclusive education, and families should not have to battle the system for this.

During the 12-week consultation period on the proposals: ‘SEND reform, putting children and young people first’, we hosted over 200 engagement events, meetings and roundtables, including ‘deep dives’ conversation and discussions on the interaction between children’s social care reforms and recommendations from the Law Commission’s report into disabled children’s social care. The government will provide a full response to this report in the autumn.

The SEND reform consultation has now closed, and we are carefully reviewing and taking into account all responses submitted to the consultation. We will publish a response to the consultation in due course and bring forward legislation at the earliest opportunity as set out in the King’s Speech.


Written Question
Students: Fees and Charges
Friday 17th July 2026

Asked by: Matt Vickers (Conservative - Stockton West)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, for what reason maximum tuition fee levels for the 2028-29 academic year have not been published; and what assessment she has made of the potential impact of publishing tuition fee levels a limited number of years in advance on families’ ability to plan financially for three-year degree courses.

Answered by Josh MacAlister - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

The higher education (HE) sector needs a secure financial footing to face the challenges of the next decade, and to ensure that all students can be confident they will receive the world-class HE experience they deserve.

The department plans to provide long-term certainty over future funding for the sector, so that it can focus on reform. That is why we have increased tuition fee caps for all HE providers in line with forecast inflation in 2026/27 and 2027/28, and we will legislate when parliamentary time allows to increase tuition fee caps automatically for future academic years.

The government uses the Office for Budget Responsibility’s RPIX inflation forecasts to determine tuition fee cap uplifts. These inflation forecasts can change over time. Using a later forecast for 2028/29 will ensure that the uplifts are fair to both students and providers.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 16 Jul 2026
Business of the House

"Over recent years, the people of Stockton have seen investment in the local health service, with a new diagnostic centre, a new mental health hub and new state-of-the-art robotics. But North Tees hospital is reaching the end of its life. The outstanding staff who work there deserve a first-class place …..."
Matt Vickers - View Speech

View all Matt Vickers (Con - Stockton West) contributions to the debate on: Business of the House

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 16 Jul 2026
Sir David Amess Summer Adjournment

"I start by joining the many other hon. Members who have paid tribute to Ann Widdecombe. She was a remarkable, inspiring and passionate woman, and I was honoured to welcome her to Stockton on numerous occasions. My thoughts go out to her friends and family.

One issue that is raised …..."

Matt Vickers - View Speech

View all Matt Vickers (Con - Stockton West) contributions to the debate on: Sir David Amess Summer Adjournment

Division Vote (Commons)
15 Jul 2026 - Trade Unions - View Vote Context
Matt Vickers (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 109
Division Vote (Commons)
15 Jul 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context
Matt Vickers (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 109
Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 15 Jul 2026
National Security

"It is right that these measures have been brought forward, and the Opposition will support them. The powers Parliament created through the National Security Act exist for precisely this purpose. They are there to respond to hostile state activity and those who threaten our national security. It is right that …..."
Matt Vickers - View Speech

View all Matt Vickers (Con - Stockton West) contributions to the debate on: National Security

Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 15 Jul 2026
National Security

"We put in place powers that assist in this. The first duty of any Government is to keep the public safe, regardless of which party is in office. We introduced the National Security Act 2023. The Minister and I have had many debates on this subject, pushing for action, and …..."
Matt Vickers - View Speech

View all Matt Vickers (Con - Stockton West) contributions to the debate on: National Security

Written Question
Pain
Wednesday 15th July 2026

Asked by: Matt Vickers (Conservative - Stockton West)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he plans to take to help improve the training given to (a) hospital and (b) general practice doctors in (i) understanding and (ii) supporting patients who are in chronic pains.

Answered by Sharon Hodgson

To support all healthcare professionals in the assessment and management of chronic pain, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has published guidance, which can be found at the following link:

https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng193

The guidance includes recommendations for healthcare professionals on how to carry out a person-centred assessment when an individual presents with chronic pain, how to develop a care and support plan for a patient with chronic pain, and how to manage flare-ups of chronic pain. The guidance also includes recommendations on both pharmacological and non-pharmacological management options for chronic pain.

Building on the NICE guidelines, the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) has produced an e-learning course on chronic pain in adults, which is available at the following link:

https://elearning.rcgp.org.uk/course/info.php?id=588

The e-learning course aims to increase understanding amongst general practitioners (GPs) about chronic pain and to educate GPs and other healthcare professionals about the physiology of pain. It gives practical advice about how the NICE guidelines can be applied to patient care. The training curriculum for postgraduate trainee doctors is set by the RCGP, and has to meet the standards set by the General Medical Council.

Doctors are responsible for ensuring their own clinical knowledge remains up-to-date and for identifying learning needs as part of their continuing professional development. This activity should include taking account of new research and developments in guidance, such as that produced by NICE, to ensure that they can continue to provide high quality care to all patients.


Division Vote (Commons)
14 Jul 2026 - Public Office (Accountability) Bill - View Vote Context
Matt Vickers (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 102 Noes - 409