(10 years, 1 month ago)
Written StatementsFurther to my statement to Parliament on 12 March 2014, Official Report, column 27WS, I wish to inform the House that today the Government Diamond Office has amended its charging structure, bringing it into line with the Government’s best practice on charging for services.
A public consultation on the review of the Government Diamond Office’s charging structure ran from 13 March to 27 March. The Government have given careful consideration to the responses received. We also considered the need to set our fees at a level which ensures that we have sufficient income to continue to provide this service, and the need to bring our charging structure in line with the Government’s best practice for charging for services.
The new single fee for the service of issuing a Kimberley process certificate will be £37 for the financial year 2014-15. This represents the full cost of providing this service. The previous charging structure was divided into bands based on the value of the rough diamond shipment.
The new fee comes into force today and will be reviewed annually. A copy of the results of the consultation and the updated statutory instrument will be placed in the House Library and on the gov.uk website.
(10 years, 1 month ago)
Commons Chamber9. What steps he is taking to support families attending murder trials of British nationals abroad.
We provide a high level of support to families whose loved ones are murdered or on trial abroad, alongside UK police and specialist non-governmental organisations which we part-fund. Support can include providing additional information about local lawyers, accompanying families to meetings and attending trials at key points. We are currently reviewing what additional support is possible and consulting widely on the matter.
Will the Minister look again at what financial assistance the Government can provide to parents of those murdered abroad, specifically including interest-free loans so that families of victims can attend trials on foreign soil and see for themselves that justice is done?
I am well aware that the hon. Gentleman has a particularly sensitive case in his constituency, but I can assure him that we look at the individual circumstances of every case and an assessment is made of vulnerability. We use NGOs such as Missing Abroad, which can help secure free or cheap flights. Also, we use NGOs to provide video conferencing facilities to enable loved ones to watch the proceedings that take place. I hope he has been contacted about the consultation. We are looking at what more we can do to help the families.
10. What recent progress has been made on negotiations on bilateral EU free trade agreements; and if he will make a statement.
What actions are the Foreign Office team taking to ensure consular access to Andargachew Tsege? He is an Ethiopian-born British citizen who was seized at Sanaa airport by Ethiopian officials on 23 June, sentenced to death in absentia by a court in Ethiopia and held at an undisclosed location in Ethiopia. Despite the efforts of my hon. Friend the Member for Islington South and Finsbury (Emily Thornberry) and me, he still has not had consular or legal access. Could the Foreign Office urgently contact the Ethiopian Government and ensure that access is obtained?
The hon. Gentleman is absolutely right to raise this concerning case. I reassure him that we are doing everything we can to ensure that the gentleman concerned gets consular access. I spoke to the Ethiopian Foreign Minister last Friday night, and my colleagues at the Department for International Development spoke to the Ethiopian Prime Minister. We continue to press the Ethiopian Government to get access. I have approved a letter to be sent to the hon. Gentleman and other hon. Members who are particularly interested in this case, to set out what continued action we intend to deliver.
T8. The Minister said earlier that Israel has the right to defend itself against missile attack, and I entirely agree, but he went on to say that the response must be proportionate. Is it not transparently obvious that the response is not proportionate, but grossly disproportionate and outwith international law? On that basis, will he not look again at the preferential trade arrangements that Israel enjoys at the moment?
(10 years, 1 month ago)
Written StatementsI am pleased to provide Parliament with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office’s annual account of Government support for the principles and institutions of international justice in 2013-14, and our plans for funding them in the year ahead. Today is international justice day, a particularly appropriate time to focus on this vital area of work.
The UK’s support for international justice is crucial to our foreign policy. International justice is essential for ensuring that perpetrators of atrocities are held to account for their actions, and that victims see justice done. It makes a valuable contribution to addressing the underlying causes of conflict, helping victims of atrocities and their communities come to terms with the past, and deterring those who might otherwise commit such violations in the future. The UK has continued to support the work of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the international tribunals to tackle impunity for crimes such as genocide, mass killing, using sexual violence as a weapon of war, and use of child soldiers. This work helps to strengthen the rules-based international system and makes a contribution towards building a safer more secure world.
For calendar year 2013 we provided assessed contributions of £7.5 million to the International Criminal Court, £4.9 million to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, £3.5 million to the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, and £l million to the Residual Mechanism which will take on the essential functions of the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda tribunals when they close. In addition, for the financial year 2013-14 we made voluntary contributions of £920,000 to the international component of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, £100,000 to the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone, and £l million to the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. The UK also contributed £1.3 million in total to the International Criminal Court trust fund for victims, earmarked for projects which support survivors of acts of sexual violence committed in conflict. This complemented wider UK work to shatter the culture of impunity for perpetrators of crimes of sexual violence in conflict through the preventing sexual violence initiative and the global summit to end sexual violence in conflict.
In November 2013 Charles Taylor, sentenced to 50 years’ imprisonment by the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL), was transferred to the UK at the request of the court. Mr Taylor is now serving his sentence in a UK prison.
As a state party to the International Criminal Court, a member of the United Nations Security Council which oversees the Rwanda and former Yugoslavia tribunals, and a member of the management bodies for the Sierra Leone and Cambodia courts and the Lebanon tribunal, we engaged actively throughout the year to ensure these institutions were run effectively and efficiently.
The coming year will see a great deal of activity on international justice. The International Criminal Court will continue its investigations in eight situation countries: to date 21 cases have been brought before the Court. The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda will close with its remaining functions transferring to the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals. The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia will deliver a verdict in the first phase of the trial of the most senior surviving members of the Khmer Rouge. And the Residual Special Court for Sierra Leone will continue to uphold the legacy of the Special Court for Sierra Leone.
The UK will continue to support these institutions and make contributions to them over the next 12 months. We will continue to encourage other states to contribute to these courts and tribunals in order to give them more financial security through a broader donor base. And we will continue to ensure they deliver value for money by scrutinising budgets and making sure they make the best use of available resources.
(10 years, 1 month ago)
Written StatementsI have today placed a copy of the annual statement on the Government wine cellar for the financial year 2013-14 in the Libraries of both Houses.
Following the outcome of the review of the Government hospitality wine cellar, this third annual statement continues our commitment that there would be annual statements to Parliament on the use of the wine cellar, covering consumption, stock purchases, costs, and value for money. The wine cellar is now self-funding through the sale of some high-value stock and payments made by other Government Departments to Government hospitality.
The report notes that:
Sales of stock amounted to £56,000 (in comparison to £63,300 in FY 2012-13);
Further funds from other Government Departments added £16,762 to the overall receipts (a slight decrease in comparison to 2012-13);
Purchases amounted to £50,054 (in comparison to £45,866 in 2011-12);
For the second time the highest consumption level by volume was of English wine, at 48% of the total (in comparison to 49% in 2012-13); and
Consumption dropped in 2013-14 by around 13.5%.
(10 years, 1 month ago)
Written StatementsThe value of unpaid congestion charge debt incurred by diplomatic missions and international organisations in London since its introduction in February 2003 until 31 December 2013 as advised by Transport for London was £75,364,182. The table below shows those diplomatic missions and international organisations with outstanding fines of £100,000 or more.
Country | Number of Fines | Total Outstanding |
---|---|---|
Embassy of the United States of America | 70,637 | £8,172,245 |
Embassy of Japan | 48,520 | £5,623,040 |
Embassy of the Russian Federation | 44,145 | £5,123,450 |
High Commission of the Federal Republic of Nigeria | 39,604 | £4,552,745 |
Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany | 34,051 | £3,928,680 |
Office of the High Commissioner for India | 28,069 | £3,316,770 |
Embassy of the Republic of Poland | 23,170 | £2,725,275 |
Office of the High Commissioner for Ghana | 21,156 | £2,488,300 |
Embassy of the Republic of Sudan | 20,307 | £2,282,505 |
Embassy of the Republic of Kazakhstan | 15,757 | £1,868,295 |
Kenya High Commission | 16,210 | £1,844,695 |
Embassy of France | 13,995 | £1,622,925 |
Embassy of Spain | 13,691 | £1,607,095 |
Embassy of the People’s Republic of China | 11,828 | £1,413,145 |
High Commission for the United Republic of Tanzania | 12,230 | £1,377,930 |
Embassy of Romania | 11,522 | £1,341,630 |
Embassy of Greece | 10,960 | £1,282,487 |
Embassy of Ukraine | 10,968 | £1,275,605 |
Embassy of the Republic of Korea | 10,504 | £1,248,525 |
High Commission for the Islamic Republic of Pakistan | 10,383 | £1,239,420 |
South African High Commission | 9,686 | £1,099,420 |
Embassy of the Republic of Cuba | 8,857 | £1,048,180 |
People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria | 9,170 | £1,038,645 |
Sierra Leone High Commission | 8,960 | £1,005,090 |
High Commission for the Republic of Cyprus | 7,287 | £858,720 |
Embassy of Hungary | 7,326 | £855,195 |
Embassy of the Republic of Bulgaria | 6,171 | £707,015 |
Embassy of the Republic of Yemen | 5,998 | £695,560 |
High Commission for the Republic of Zambia | 6,007 | £689,095 |
Embassy of the Republic of Belarus | 5,227 | £605,670 |
Embassy of the Slovak Republic | 5,165 | £598,810 |
High Commission for the Republic of Cameroon | 4,828 | £549,855 |
High Commission of the Republic of Malawi | 4,239 | £489,195 |
Botswana High Commission | 3,998 | £468,605 |
Embassy of the Republic of Zimbabwe | 4,271 | £467,985 |
Embassy of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia | 4,144 | £466,965 |
High Commission for the Republic of Namibia | 4,016 | 450,285 |
Kingdom of Swaziland High Commission | 3,959 | £442,695 |
High Commission for the Republic of Mozambique | 3,773 | £430,385 |
Embassy of Austria | 3,484 | £408,430 |
Embassy of the Republic of Equatorial Guinea | 3,569 | £406,060 |
Mauritius High Commission | 3,449 | £393,895 |
Embassy of the Czech Republic | 3,335 | £383,710 |
Malta High Commission | 3,087 | £360,225 |
Embassy of the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire | 3,139 | £354,325 |
Embassy of Belgium | 2,960 | £346,220 |
High Commission of the Kingdom of Lesotho | 3,050 | £343,585 |
Uganda High Commission | 2,896 | £335,015 |
Embassy of the Republic of Lithuania | 2,806 | £333,825 |
Embassy of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan | 2,799 | £330,875 |
Royal Danish Embassy | 2,603 | £306,825 |
Embassy of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam | 2,656 | £304,655 |
Embassy of the Republic of Liberia | 2,516 | £294,400 |
Jamaican High Commission | 2,165 | £249,285 |
Embassy of the Republic of Guinea | 2,222 | £245,185 |
Embassy of the Arab Republic of Egypt | 2,073 | £212,630 |
Embassy of the Democratic Republic of the Congo | 1,756 | £208,910 |
Embassy of Portugal | 1,730 | £207,275 |
Embassy of Finland | 1,719 | £200,640 |
Embassy of the Republic of Latvia | 1,670 | £194,950 |
Embassy of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea | 1,755 | £194,565 |
Embassy of Luxembourg | 1,557 | £182,360 |
Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia | 1,633 | £174,470 |
Embassy of the Republic of Turkey | 1,528 | £169,065 |
High Commission for Antigua & Barbuda | 1,399 | £161,375 |
Embassy of the Republic of Slovenia | 1,238 | £147,560 |
Embassy of Tunisia | 1,192 | £139,955 |
High Commission of Sri Lanka | 1,079 | £129,505 |
Embassy of the Republic of Estonia | 984 | £117,500 |
Embassy of the Dominican Republic | 1,001 | £117,310 |
Embassy of the State of Eritrea | 936 | £107,465 |
(10 years, 1 month ago)
Written StatementsIn 2013, 5,662 unpaid parking fines incurred by diplomatic missions and international organisations in the United Kingdom were brought to our attention by councils. These totalled £541,599.
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office has held face-to-face meetings with a number of missions about outstanding parking fine debt. In addition, in April this year we wrote to diplomatic missions and international organisations concerned giving them the opportunity to either pay their outstanding fines or appeal against them if they considered that the fines had been issued incorrectly.
Subsequent payments—including amounts waived by councils—totalled £197,423. There remains a total of £344,176 in unpaid fines for 2013.
The table below details those diplomatic missions and international organisations that have outstanding fines totalling £1,000 or more, as of 27 June 2014.
Diplomatic Mission/International Organisation | Amount of Outstanding Fines (excluding congestion charge) £ |
---|---|
High Commission for the Federal Republic of Nigeria | 74,557 |
Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia | 30,690 |
High Commission for the Republic of Zambia | 22,700 |
Embassy of the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire | 14,115 |
Embassy of the Republic of Uzbekistan | 13,375 |
Embassy of the Republic of Liberia | 11,180 |
Malaysian High Commission | 10,370 |
Embassy of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea | 10,320 |
Embassy of the State of Qatar | 10,115 |
Embassy of the Republic of Iraq | 9,150 |
Embassy of the Sultanate of Oman | 7,095 |
Embassy of the Republic of the Sudan | 7,050 |
Embassy of France | 6,130 |
Embassy of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan | 5,485 |
Embassy of the Republic of Kazakhstan | 5,370 |
Embassy of the Republic of Equatorial Guinea | 4,800 |
Sierra Leone High Commission | 4,525 |
High Commission for the Islamic Republic of Pakistan | 4,415 |
Office of the High Commissioner for Ghana | 4,085 |
Embassy of Greece | 3,510 |
Embassy of Tunisia | 3,405 |
Kenya High Commission | 3,392 |
Embassy of the Arab Republic of Egypt | 3,327 |
Embassy of Georgia | 3,140 |
Embassy of Romania | 2,975 |
Embassy of the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria | 2,835 |
Embassy of the Republic of Angola | 2,820 |
1 Embassy of the Kingdom of Morocco | 2,745 |
1 Embassy of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan | 2,620 |
Embassy of the Republic of Azerbaijan | 2,520 |
Embassy of the Republic of Bulgaria | 2,370 |
Embassy of the Republic of Yemen | 2,190 |
High Commission for the Republic of Mozambique | 2,155 |
Embassy of the Republic of Lithuania | 2,095 |
Office of the High Commissioner for India | 2,085 |
Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany | 2,037 |
Embassy of the Republic of Indonesia | 2,030 |
Embassy of the Republic of South Sudan | 1,665 |
South African High Commission | 1,627 |
High Commission of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh | 1,547 |
Embassy of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia | 1,470 |
Embassy of the State of Libya | 1,450 |
Embassy of the People’s Republic of China | 1,380 |
Embassy of Ukraine | 1,365 |
Embassy of Brazil | 1,250 |
Embassy of the Russian Federation | 1,185 |
Embassy of the Democratic Republic of Congo | 1,115 |
Embassy of the United States of America | 1,075 |
Embassy of Italy | 1,062 |
(10 years, 1 month ago)
Written StatementsThe majority of diplomatic missions in the United Kingdom pay the national non-domestic rates (NNDR) due from them. Diplomatic missions are obliged to pay only 6% of the total NNDR value of their offices. This represents payment for specific services such as street cleaning and street lighting.
Representations by the Protocol Directorate of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office to missions in 2014 led to the settlement of outstanding debts by Kuwait, Maldives, Nepal, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia and Sri Lanka—among others.
As at 30 June 2014, the total amount of outstanding NNDR payments owed by foreign diplomatic missions as advised by the Valuation Office Agency is £726,076, an increase of 7% over the 2012 figure, as reported in my 2013 WMS (£674,110). However, £72,137 of this outstanding debt is owed by Iran—which is in the process of reopening its embassy in the UK—and Syria, which is not currently represented in the UK. We have therefore been unable to pursue these debts. Three missions are responsible for just over half of the remainder. We shall continue to urge those with NNDR debt to pay their dues.
Missions listed below owed over £10,000 in respect of NNDR | |
---|---|
Embassy of the People’s Republic of China | £146,564 |
Embassy of the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire | £96,258 |
High Commission for the People’s Republic of Bangladesh | £92,499 |
Sierra Leone High Commission | £57,477 |
Embassy of the Republic of Lithuania | £38,703 |
Embassy of the Republic of the Sudan | £26,137 |
Embassy of the Republic of Korea | £22,749 |
Embassy of the Republic of Liberia | £24,749 |
Embassy of Ukraine | £20,911 |
Embassy of the Republic of Albania | £15,554 |
Embassy of the Republic of Zimbabwe | £14,053 |
Embassy of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia | £10,988 |
(10 years, 1 month ago)
Written StatementsIn 2013, 14 serious and significant offences allegedly committed by people entitled to diplomatic immunity in the United Kingdom were drawn to the attention of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office by Diplomatic Protection Group of the Metropolitan Police. Eight of these were driving-related. We define serious offences as those which could, in certain circumstances, carry a penalty of 12 months, imprisonment or more. Also included are drink-driving and driving without insurance.
Some 21,500 people are entitled to diplomatic immunity in the United Kingdom and the majority of diplomats abide by UK law. The number of alleged serious crimes committed by members of the diplomatic community in the UK is proportionately low.
Under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961, those entitled to immunity are expected to obey the law. The FCO does not tolerate foreign diplomats breaking the law.
We take all allegations of illegal activity seriously. When instances of alleged criminal conduct are brought to our attention by the police, we ask the relevant foreign Government to waive diplomatic immunity where appropriate. For the most serious offences, and when a relevant waiver has not been granted, we seek the immediate withdrawal of the diplomat.
Alleged serious and significant offences reported to the FCO in 2013 are listed below.
Driving a vehicle reported as lost or stolen and without insurance | |
Sierra Leone | 1 |
Driving while under the influence of alcohol and without insurance | |
El Salvador | 1 |
Driving under the influence of alcohol | |
Saudi Arabia | 2 |
Belarus | 1 |
Macedonia | 1 |
Kuwait | 1 |
Zambia | 1 |
Sexual Assault | |
Zambia | 1 |
Domestic Rape | |
Pakistan | 1 |
Child Abduction | |
Pakistan | 1 |
Actual Bodily Harm | |
Cameroon | 1 |
Zambia | 1 |
Public Order Offence | |
Kuwait | 1 |
(10 years, 1 month ago)
Written StatementsI would like to inform the House of three important developments that will benefit the British overseas territories and British overseas territories citizens. This Government set out, in our 2012 White Paper, a vision for the overseas territories to be vibrant and flourishing communities. We established a joint ministerial council, bringing together UK Ministers and territory leaders and representatives, to drive forward implementation of our strategy.
I am delighted that from 9 June 2014 the European Union has agreed visa-free travel to the Schengen area for British nationals who are not citizens of the United Kingdom (this includes British overseas territory citizens, British subjects, British overseas citizens, and British protected persons). This decision will enable nearly 300,000 British nationals from the territories to travel freely on British overseas territories citizen passports in 30 countries in Europe. British overseas territories citizens can already visit the UK without visas. Most British overseas territories citizens are also British citizens. The EU’s decision reflects the successful conclusion of three years of negotiations involving the UK Government, territory Governments and the European Commission.
I am also pleased to inform you that United Kingdom Trade and Investment (UKTI) has made arrangements to provide their overseas market introduction service (OMIS) to companies located in the overseas territories from June 2014. This service is chargeable and assists companies to access the right international contacts or partners, find the best way to do business in a market and help to penetrate new markets. UKTI experts can also advise on local conditions including competitors, regulations and accessing and influencing decision makers.
Finally, I am pleased to announce that the third round of the Overseas Territories Environment and Climate Fund, known as Darwin Plus, was launched on 22 May. This initiative currently supports 29 projects in the territories to a value of approximately £4 million. In all of this, the UK Government remain committed to the development of strong and sustainable local economies, with flourishing communities, and setting world standards in our stewardship of the extraordinary natural environments in the overseas territories.
(10 years, 1 month ago)
Commons ChamberI congratulate the hon. Member for East Lothian (Fiona O'Donnell) on securing this important debate and on the passionate, informed and articulate way in which she introduced it. She was right to highlight some of the complexities of these important issues, and I will come to some of the very specific points that she asked about later.
It needs to be said that the subject has been at the forefront of the Government’s agenda, coming as it does after the recent global summit to end sexual violence in conflict. The hon. Lady was right to congratulate the Foreign Secretary and all the officials who were involved in organising the summit, which was the largest ever held on the issue. It set in motion a series of unprecedented practical steps and commitments, such as the first ever international protocol on how to document and investigate sexual violence in conflict, and a statement of action, uniting Governments, UN agencies, civil society, experts and survivors in a shared determination to tackle sexual violence.
When it comes to children’s lives, all efforts must be made. That is why I am personally committed to tackling this issue, not least as the father of three children. I am concentrating my efforts on raising awareness and helping to prevent the recruitment and use of children in armed conflict, focusing on demobilising child soldiers and preventing sexual violence against children, working with multilateral agencies and encouraging those with successful track records to assist those who still have challenges.
During visits to Somalia, South Sudan and the DRC, I have witnessed at first hand the devastation that conflict causes not just to children, but to whole communities. I have also seen the excellent work of NGOs such as War Child, which make a real difference to children’s lives on the ground. I take the opportunity to join other Members of all parties in acknowledging and thanking all the NGOs involved in the issue for their tireless commitment and energy.
As several hon. Members highlighted, on the fringes of the ESVC summit, I held and spoke at a meeting on children and armed conflict in front of a knowledgeable and large audience. There were powerful testimonies from a survivor of the war in Sierra Leone and a child soldier from Uganda, both of whom spoke bravely and articulately about their experiences. Closer to home, a very brave lady, who was affected by the conflict in Bosnia, spoke. That collectively underlined the grave dangers that children face during conflict and the need for us to take urgent action to prevent this from affecting a greater number of children around the world.
In addition to that fringe meeting in the ESVC summit, I also brought together Ministers from the DRC and Somalia along with countries that have experience of successfully tackling the issue. My hon. Friend the Member for Stafford (Jeremy Lefroy) rightly mentioned Sierra Leone, whose Minister underlined the importance of disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration programmes to ensure that children have crucial access to education and training. As other hon. Members have highlighted, that is vital in ensuring that children become less vulnerable to recruitment and sexual violence. As the hon. Member for Bristol East (Kerry McCarthy) rightly said, those who have made progress more recently, for example, Chad, have a significant role to play in assisting others.
At this stage let me tackle head-on the point made by my hon. Friend the Member for Stafford about the role of the United Nations. It has been 15 years since the Security Council recognised children in armed conflict as an issue of international peace and security, with the adoption of resolution 1261. As my hon. Friend the Member for East Worthing and Shoreham (Tim Loughton) rightly pointed out, the United Kingdom continues to play a leading role at the United Nations and internationally on that issue. I was therefore pleased that under the UK’s presidency of the Security Council in July last year, the UN adopted a strong presidential statement to protect the robust mandate of the UN special representative for children affected by armed conflict, as well as introducing steps for tackling persistent perpetrators. That was followed by UN Security Council resolution 2143 in March this year, which outlines practical steps for combating violations against children, while drawing attention to attacks on schools.
I commend the efforts of the United Nations in tackling that issue, and in particular the excellent UN special representative of the Secretary-General for the initiative Children, not Soldiers, which is designed to end the recruitment and use of children by Government armed forces in conflict by 2016. As a result of the SRSG’s excellent work in that area, more than 20 countries have agreed action plans with the UN, and to halt the recruitment and use of children—including, most recently, the Government of Yemen. Those action plans play a crucial role in putting pressure on the perpetrators of those abhorrent violations against children.
In Africa, as I mentioned, we have seen progress in Chad with a completion of its action plan, and a recommitment from South Sudan this month to the action plan it signed in 2012. We must be clear, however, that this issue does not only affect African countries. As we saw in the Secretary-General’s annual report on children and armed conflict, which was released on Tuesday, grave violations have been committed against children in 23 countries, including Iraq, Syria and Burma, and all those countries have been rightly mentioned in this debate.
In Syria and the wider region, 5.5 million children are in need of education, and more than half are out of school. There is danger of a “lost generation” of Syrian children experiencing trauma, displacement and missing out on education, which is the cornerstone for brighter futures. Their lives have been disrupted and potentially wasted. That is why the UK is supporting UNICEF and others in Syria and the region through the No Lost Generation initiative, which aims to increase support for education, psychosocial support, and protection for Syrian children. In addition to education, support partners are running child-friendly spaces that provide a safe place for Syrian children to play and study. This is therefore a global issue that requires a global solution. I highlight to the House the importance that the Prime Minister and Government attach to the girl summit that will be held in July in the United Kingdom, which will hopefully mobilise domestic and international efforts to end female genital mutilation, and early and forced marriage.
To return briefly to the Minister’s comments about Lebanon and Jordan, does he recognise a possible future problem in that our aid is supporting refugees whereas the Jordanian and Lebanese populations are struggling as rent prices are forced up? We must guard against that possible tension in the future.
The hon. Lady is right to make that point and there are huge challenges, primarily because of the scale of what is happening in Syria and the displacement of people, both inside Syria and across geopolitical boundaries. In a moment I will detail some of the support that the Department for International Development is providing to people still within Syria, and those who are outside.
Let me use this opportunity to respond to some of the important points that the hon. Lady raised. Hopefully, she will be aware that the UK is an active member of the UN working group on children and armed conflict, and right at the forefront of the international response to issues of child soldiers and child protection. The UK pushes at multilateral level for the inclusion of child protection in peacekeeping responses through UN mandates, both as they are renewed and initial resolutions. Child protection advisers are currently deployed through the UN missions in Mali, the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, South Sudan, Somalia, Haiti, Côte d’Ivoire, Darfur, Iraq and Afghanistan.
The hon. Lady was right to ask forcefully about child protection training for front-line staff, and the UK is providing £232,000 for the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations to develop pre-deployment child protection training modules for military and police peacekeepers who encounter children affected by armed conflict. She mentioned the draft Lucens guidelines, and the Department welcomes that those underline existing rules for international humanitarian law to promote better understanding and implementation of the Geneva conventions and their protocols. The draft guidelines form part of our wider protection of civilians approach. A decision on UK Government support for those guidelines needs cross-Whitehall agreement, and we are engaging with our colleagues across Departments.
My hon. Friend the Member for Gainsborough (Sir Edward Leigh) made an excellent speech that articulately and strongly highlighted the terrible events and crimes that affect children. I know he has been to the DRC, and he will therefore be aware of the funding that the Foreign and Commonwealth Office provides to a project in that country led by War Child. I recently visited Goma and saw for myself the excellent work being done by the UN on disarmament, demobilisation and the reintegration of children back into communities. It must also be acknowledged that authorities in the DRC have made good progress in removing children from the ranks of the Congolese army, and they are significantly committed to implementing their action plan, which they discussed in the ESVC summit and the fringe meetings that took place.
My hon. Friend also, quite rightly, mentioned the importance of education, and as part of the package to support the Nigerian Government after the terrible events that have occurred in northern Nigeria, DFID, along with the United States Agency for International Development, is hoping to put in place policies and funding that will draw back into education more than 1 million children in northern Nigeria. DFID is the largest bilateral education donor. Some 11% of its funding goes on education aid, half of which is committed to being spent in fragile and conflicted-affected states. The UK funds partners to provide education supply kits in refugee camps in Syria, and is committed to providing packs of textbooks to benefit 300,000 Syrian children and to funding programmes in Syria to provide basic education. I inform my hon. Friend the Member for Oxford West and Abingdon (Nicola Blackwood) that an open working group at the UN will conclude a report on post-2015 goals for discussion at the General Assembly. Education will clearly form an integral part of that, and those discussions are ongoing.
The hon. Member for Easington (Grahame M. Morris) made a powerful contribution discussing primarily the challenges that are raging in the middle east, particularly as they relate to the Israel-Palestine conflict. I reiterate that we utterly condemn the appalling murders of both Israeli and Palestinian children, and we stand ready to help bring those responsible to justice. We are concerned about the recent increase in violence in Gaza and the risks to children. Rockets coming from Gaza into Israel must stop. We call on Israel, Egypt and the Palestinian Authority to work together to allow for the legal use of the Gaza strip for innocent people. I also inform the hon. Gentleman that DFID has a number of initiatives to protect children specifically in the region, including psychosocial support and clearing schools of unexploded devices.
My hon. Friend the Member for Stafford has knowledge of, passion for and interest in Africa. He was right to highlight the appalling actions there, including women being raped and then prosecuted, and ending up in prison, as I have seen for myself, and the extraordinary challenge of child soldiers. He was right to suggest that progress can and is being made in reconciliation and rehabilitation. Like the hon. Member for Bristol East (Kerry McCarthy), I saw for myself the displaced peoples camps up in Gulu in northern Uganda—it sounds as though we were there at a similar time—and the extraordinary work being done by NGOs such as Oxfam and Christian Aid, not just on assimilating people back into communities, but on forgiveness in such difficult and challenging areas.
My hon. Friend may also be interested to know of the significant progress that has been made by Chad, Sierra Leone and Liberia on stopping recruitment in the first place by putting in place policies on, for example, birth registration. The safer schools initiative is important. Hopefully, he is aware that the UK has invested in that initiative in northern Nigeria, which is being ably led by our ex-Prime Minister.
My hon. Friend the Member for East Worthing and Shoreham (Tim Loughton) was right to crystallise some of the horrific events we have seen recently. Hopefully, he is aware of the support that the UK Government are providing to the Nigerian Government specifically to deal with the challenges in northern Nigeria. He was right to highlight the fact that the UK is leading in that area, whether on ending impunity, building capacity, training, assistance for rehabilitation or allocating funding.
My hon. Friend was correct, as he concluded his remarks, to highlight the importance of forced marriage and female genital mutilation. In July, the Prime Minister will host the UK’s first girl summit, but I should take this opportunity to be unequivocal on the UK position on FGM and forced marriages. In the UK, both are criminal offences, and they are child abuse when minors are involved. We are fully committed to tackling those issues, for example through the work of the joint Foreign and Commonwealth Office and Home Office forced marriage unit, and through providing funding for NGOs.
The hon. Member for Bristol East, who spoke for the Opposition, was right to mention the challenges and the horrific events that have taken place in the Central African Republic. We have contributed £23 million to the CAR, providing emergency health care and support for hundreds of thousands of people. The CAR interim president has rightly referred the situation in the country to the International Criminal Court, which has the scope to investigate the allegations, but the situation is dire, particularly outside the capital, and we are doing everything we can to ensure that UN Security Council resolution 2149, which was adopted earlier this year, is deployed by 15 September.
I recognise the hon. Lady’s points on Burma, but I want to ensure that the House understands that the Burmese Government are committed to ending the practice that she mentioned, building on the progress since signing the action plan with the UN in June 2012. Some child soldiers have been released in Burma, but we are working closely with the Burmese authorities to ensure that releases continue.
All parties to armed conflict, state and non-state alike, must abide by international law. The protection of civilians during armed conflict is a priority for the United Kingdom and forms an integral part of our building stability overseas strategy. We therefore remain committed to making progress. I believe that such abuse of children, wherever it is in the world, but particularly in conflict areas, should not and must not be tolerated. The words “children” and “soldiers” should not and do not belong in the same sentence.