To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Commons)
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 306 Labour No votes vs 4 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 87 Noes - 404
Division Vote (Commons)
12 May 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 293 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 94 Noes - 315
Division Vote (Commons)
7 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 288 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 363
Division Vote (Commons)
7 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 287 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 160 Noes - 294
Division Vote (Commons)
7 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 283 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 287
Division Vote (Commons)
7 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 292 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 295
Written Question
Packaging: Recycling
Tuesday 6th May 2025

Asked by: Mark Sewards (Labour - Leeds South West and Morley)

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether the introduction of Extended Producer Responsibility packaging taxation will ensure that the cost of recycling is passed to manufacturers.

Answered by Mary Creagh - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

Packaging Extended Producer Responsibility (pEPR) implements the polluter-pays principle by obligating brands and packaging producers to pay the costs of managing household packaging waste.


Division Vote (Commons)
30 Apr 2025 - Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-sentence Reports) Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 210 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 3
Division Vote (Commons)
30 Apr 2025 - Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-sentence Reports) Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 211 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 226
Division Vote (Commons)
30 Apr 2025 - Sentencing Guidelines (Pre-sentence Reports) Bill - View Vote Context
Mark Sewards (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 208 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 222