Continuous At-Sea Deterrent Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Defence

Continuous At-Sea Deterrent

Marion Fellows Excerpts
Wednesday 10th April 2019

(5 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Simon Clarke Portrait Mr Clarke
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The principle of the debate is whether we should have the nuclear deterrent. The Scottish nationalists, for a mixture of bizarre self-loathing of this country and political opportunism—[Interruption.] No. I am proud to come from a country that will defend ourselves and our allies. If that is good enough for the United Kingdom, it is certainly good enough for Scotland. The only negative tone in this entire debate has been injected, by common accord, by SNP Members. They are the only ones who want to divide the House—

Marion Fellows Portrait Marion Fellows (Motherwell and Wishaw) (SNP)
- Hansard - -

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Simon Clarke Portrait Mr Clarke
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No, I will not give way. I have had enough negative carping from a bunch of people who, frankly, bring great discredit upon their own country by their constant negativity and the way in which they are the sole dissenting voice in a country that otherwise widely recognises our responsibilities to ourselves and others to stand up for what we believe in. If they will not do it, I certainly will.

In this resolve, we must never falter, because in the end there are those relying on us not to falter in our duties. We must not falter in our duty of gratitude and respect nor in our duty to uphold the military covenant to those who discharge this duty on our behalf. We are very fortunate to have them, and we are very fortunate to have the deterrent. Long may it continue.