Security Vetting Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Security Vetting

Luke Taylor Excerpts
Monday 20th April 2026

(1 day, 8 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Keir Starmer Portrait The Prime Minister
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is why I have asked for a review to be carried out in relation to material that could have caused any national security issues.

Luke Taylor Portrait Luke Taylor (Sutton and Cheam) (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

On 12 September, it was revealed in The Independent that Mandelson did not pass vetting by MI6, and therefore by UKSV. On 16 September, in this Chamber, my hon. Friend the Member for Tiverton and Minehead (Rachel Gilmour) made the same claim in the presence of the Minister of State, the hon. Member for Cardiff South and Penarth (Stephen Doughty). On hearing that information, did the Minister or the Prime Minister feel the need to ask whether that specific claim was true? The response given was that DV clearance was “granted by the FCDO”. As a KC, how did the Prime Minister not see the clear difference between the question that was asked, and the answer that was given? Does he agree that, in his own words, his explanation “beggars belief”?

Keir Starmer Portrait The Prime Minister
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

At various points questions were asked, and questions were put to the FCDO. The answer back was the same, because it took the view that it was not information it could share with anyone, including myself.