Official Secrets Act Case: Witness Statements Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Official Secrets Act Case: Witness Statements

Luke Taylor Excerpts
Thursday 16th October 2025

(1 day, 16 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Urgent Questions are proposed each morning by backbench MPs, and up to two may be selected each day by the Speaker. Chosen Urgent Questions are announced 30 minutes before Parliament sits each day.

Each Urgent Question requires a Government Minister to give a response on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Chris Ward Portrait Chris Ward
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Commenting on whether or not it was dropped erroneously is not something that any Minister would do from this Dispatch Box.

Luke Taylor Portrait Luke Taylor (Sutton and Cheam) (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I would like to make a broader point about China’s activities in the United Kingdom related to this. The application for the super-embassy is currently on the Government’s desk. As the Minister says, and has been acknowledged, China is a threat and is actively working to undermine our national security. The Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government said that the Government

“would never compromise national security”.

How can the Government give any consideration to approving the Chinese super-embassy, which would give extraordinary capability to China to continue to expand its espionage activities and to target Hongkongers on British soil with its transnational repression?

Chris Ward Portrait Chris Ward
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

As the hon. Gentleman says, the decision on the Chinese embassy will be taken by the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government in due course. It is completely unrelated to this case and anything in it. That is an important point to reiterate.