All 2 Debates between Lucy Rigby and Harriet Cross

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lucy Rigby and Harriet Cross
Tuesday 23rd June 2026

(1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lucy Rigby Portrait The Chief Secretary to the Treasury (Lucy Rigby)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The Pride in Place programme provides £5.8 billion of support to 284 neighbourhoods right across the country, including five places in my hon. Friend’s constituency, which she does so much to advocate for. We will set out more details of further funding in the Budget.

Harriet Cross Portrait Harriet Cross (Gordon and Buchan) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

In my constituency, we have lost the Scotbeef abattoir and the famous Donald Russell butchers in recent months, both of which were crucial to the agricultural supply chain. Both blamed high energy costs and the increased costs of doing business, such as the huge rises in national insurance under this Government and big business rate rises under the SNP. What steps is the Treasury taking to support, not suffocate, the agricultural supply chain and other crucial elements of the farming sector?

Attorney General’s Office: Conflicts of Interest

Debate between Lucy Rigby and Harriet Cross
Thursday 23rd January 2025

(1 year, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lucy Rigby Portrait The Solicitor General
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I have already addressed that point.

Harriet Cross Portrait Harriet Cross (Gordon and Buchan) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does the Minister accept that the Law Officers’ convention does not extend to questions of recusal or conflicts of interest, and that the House and the British people have the right to have questions on those matters answered transparently?

Lucy Rigby Portrait The Solicitor General
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I have been abundantly clear on this: where the Attorney General has conflicts, he will recuse himself. The Law Officers’ convention does not permit me to say in relation to which matters he has recused himself, because in doing so I would reveal the matters that the Law Officers have been asked to advise on, or indeed have advised on.