Information between 7th September 2025 - 17th October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
 Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes | 
|---|
| 15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 303 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 178 | 
| 15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 164 | 
| 15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 172 | 
| 15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 160 | 
| 15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 158 | 
| 15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 160 | 
| 15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 160 | 
| 15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 | 
| 15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 | 
| 15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 161 | 
| 15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 163 | 
| 15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 302 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 170 | 
| 10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 300 | 
| 10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 287 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 158 Noes - 297 | 
| 10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 92 Noes - 364 | 
| 10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 288 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 153 Noes - 300 | 
| 10 Sep 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 362 Noes - 87 | 
| 9 Sep 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 307 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 179 | 
| 9 Sep 2025 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 116 Noes - 333 | 
| 8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 160 | 
| 8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 325 Noes - 171 | 
| 8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 404 Noes - 98 | 
| 8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 401 Noes - 96 | 
| 8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 314 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 158 | 
| 8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 319 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 402 Noes - 97 | 
| 8 Sep 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 317 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 398 Noes - 93 | 
| 14 Oct 2025 - Mental Health Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 339 | 
| 14 Oct 2025 - Mental Health Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 164 Noes - 333 | 
| 15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 309 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 160 Noes - 324 | 
| 15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 151 Noes - 319 | 
| 15 Oct 2025 - Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill - View Vote Context Louise Haigh voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 306 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 316 | 
| Speeches | 
|---|
| Louise Haigh speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions Louise Haigh contributed 1 speech (95 words) Monday 15th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Home Office | 
| Louise Haigh speeches from:  Employment Rights Bill Louise Haigh contributed 2 speeches (212 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Monday 15th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade | 
| Written Answers | 
|---|
| Children: Protection Asked by: Louise Haigh (Labour - Sheffield Heeley) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to help ensure that police forces implement changes in practice following Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel findings. Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office) Keeping children safe is a priority for this Government and we are committed to implementing improvements in practice, including through introducing multi-agency child protection teams in the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill. The new National Centre for Violence Against Women and Girls and Public Protection launched in April 2025 will improve the police response to child protection and we will also deliver a cross-government strategy as part of our mission to halve violence against women and girls within a decade. | 
| Resettlement: Afghanistan Asked by: Louise Haigh (Labour - Sheffield Heeley) Friday 17th October 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to ensure that immigration rules do not prevent the relocation to the UK of high-profile creative artists in Afghanistan with links to the UK at risk under the Taliban. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) The UK has a proud history of providing protection for those fleeing war and persecution through our safe and legal routes. Since 2021, we have resettled over 34,500 individuals through the UK’s Afghan schemes. Given the scale of global displacement, it is unfortunately not possible to offer a pathway to the UK for every person who needs it. The UK’s Afghan schemes were never intended to operate indefinitely, and, on 1 July 2025, the Government announced the closure of the schemes. Afghans wishing to settle in the UK may apply through existing safe and legal routes for work, study and settlement. | 
| Resettlement: Afghanistan Asked by: Louise Haigh (Labour - Sheffield Heeley) Friday 17th October 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential implications for her policies of the campaign for the (a) protection and (b) resettlement of high-profile creative artists in Afghanistan with links to the UK. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) The UK has a proud history of providing protection for those fleeing war and persecution through our safe and legal routes. Since 2021, we have resettled over 34,500 individuals through the UK’s Afghan schemes. Given the scale of global displacement, it is unfortunately not possible to offer a pathway to the UK for every person who needs it. The UK’s Afghan schemes were never intended to operate indefinitely, and, on 1 July 2025, the Government announced the closure of the schemes. Afghans wishing to settle in the UK may apply through existing safe and legal routes for work, study and settlement. | 
| Resettlement: Afghanistan Asked by: Louise Haigh (Labour - Sheffield Heeley) Friday 17th October 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether she plans to establish a relocation scheme for high-profile creative artists in Afghanistan with links to the UK facing (a) imprisonment, (b) torture and (c) death. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) The UK has a proud history of providing protection for those fleeing war and persecution through our safe and legal routes. Since 2021, we have resettled over 34,500 individuals through the UK’s Afghan schemes. Given the scale of global displacement, it is unfortunately not possible to offer a pathway to the UK for every person who needs it. The UK’s Afghan schemes were never intended to operate indefinitely, and, on 1 July 2025, the Government announced the closure of the schemes. Afghans wishing to settle in the UK may apply through existing safe and legal routes for work, study and settlement. | 
| Early Day Motions Signed | 
|---|
| Tuesday 16th September Louise Haigh signed this EDM as a sponsor on Tuesday 16th September 2025 11 signatures (Most recent: 13 Oct 2025) Tabled by: Clive Betts (Labour - Sheffield South East) That this House welcomes the ground breaking Football Governance Act 2025 which will establish an independent football regulator, with powers to hold to account rogue, dishonest and incompetent owners of football clubs and potentially remove their ownership of their clubs; further welcomes the speedy and decisive way in which the … | 
| Parliamentary Debates | 
|---|
| Employment Rights Bill 178 speeches (28,836 words) Consideration of Lords amendments Monday 15th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Peter Kyle (Lab - Hove and Portslade) Friend the Member for Sheffield Heeley (Louise Haigh), who has championed this cause for many years. - Link to Speech 2: Sarah Owen (Lab - Luton North) Friend the Member for Sheffield Heeley (Louise Haigh) and all the campaigners for their work on misogyny - Link to Speech 3: None Friend the Member for Sheffield Heeley (Louise Haigh) on, and thank them for, their important work on - Link to Speech 4: Peter Kyle (Lab - Hove and Portslade) Friend the Member for Sheffield Heeley (Louise Haigh) raised an important point on non-disclosure arrangements - Link to Speech | 
| Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [Lords] 136 speeches (40,189 words) Report stage Wednesday 10th September 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Transport Mentions: 1: Heidi Alexander (Lab - Swindon South) Friend the Member for Sheffield Heeley (Louise Haigh), in making the case for the Bill and her advocacy - Link to Speech | 
| Select Committee Documents | 
|---|
| Wednesday 17th September 2025 Written Evidence - United Cabbies Group TPV0121 - Licensing of taxis and private hire vehicles Licensing of taxis and private hire vehicles - Transport Committee Found: He previously secured a commitment from former transport secretary Louise Haigh in February 2024 to | 
| Tuesday 9th September 2025 Written Evidence - The Constitution Society PEW0011 - Propriety, ethics and the wider standards landscape in the UK Propriety, ethics and the wider standards landscape in the UK - Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee Found: more recent cases, including those of Nadhim Zahawi MP, Dominic Raab MP, Tulip Siddiq MP and Louise Haigh |